Literature DB >> 7544933

Open pelvic lymph node dissection for prostate cancer: a reassessment.

S C Campbell1, E A Klein, H S Levin, M R Piedmonte.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To provide a risk-to-benefit analysis of open staging pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) for prostate cancer.
METHODS: The medical records of all patients presenting with prostate cancer from July 1989 to April 1994 were reviewed. A total of 245 patients with clinically localized disease were selected to undergo radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) preceded by open PLND. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to evaluate the predictive value of the preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) concentration, clinical stage, and Gleason score with regard to final nodal status. The cost and morbidity associated with PLND in the setting of RRP was also defined.
RESULTS: Overall, only 16 patients (6.5%) had lymph node metastases. Lymph node involvement correlated significantly with elevated serum PSA values (P = 0.0001), high Gleason score (P = 0.0022), and advanced clinical stage (P = 0.0001). Lymph node metastases were particularly uncommon in patients with nonpalpable tumors (1 of 67 [1.5%]), PSA values less than 10 (2 of 154 [1.3%]), and Gleason score less than 6 (1 of 26 [3.8%]). Overall, 179 patients (73.1%) presented with at least one or more of these favorable characteristics, and only 4 (2.2%) had lymph node involvement. Complications related to the lymphadenectomy occurred in 10 patients (4.1%). The cost per metastasis diagnosed in patients with low-risk characteristics was approximatley $43,600.
CONCLUSIONS: An open staging PLND may no longer be justified on a routine basis in patients undergoing radical retropubic prostatectomy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7544933     DOI: 10.1016/S0090-4295(99)80219-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  18 in total

1.  Cost-analysis of staging methods for lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: MRI with a lymph node-specific contrast agent compared to pelvic lymph node dissection or CT.

Authors:  Anke M Hövels; Roel A M Heesakkers; Eddy M Adang; Gerrit J Jager; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2004-07-13       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 2.  [Lymphoceles after radical retropubic prostatectomy. A treatment algorithm].

Authors:  P Anheuser; A Treiyer; E Stark; B Haben; J A Steffens
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2010-07       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  In vivo imaging of inflammation- and tumor-induced lymph node lymphangiogenesis by immuno-positron emission tomography.

Authors:  Viviane Mumprecht; Michael Honer; Benjamin Vigl; Steven T Proulx; Eveline Trachsel; Manuela Kaspar; Nadja E Banziger-Tobler; Roger Schibli; Dario Neri; Michael Detmar
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2010-10-26       Impact factor: 12.701

Review 4.  Lymphotropic nanoparticle enhanced MRI for the staging of genitourinary tumors.

Authors:  Samdeep K Mouli; Lee C Zhao; Reed A Omary; C Shad Thaxton
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2010-01-19       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Sentinel node evaluation in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Ramkishen Narayanan; Timothy G Wilson
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 5.150

6.  The importance of pelvic lymph node dissection in men with clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Mohamad E Allaf; Alan W Partin; H Ballentine Carter
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2006

7.  Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 8.  The economic costs of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christopher S Saigal; Mark S Litwin
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 4.981

9.  Limited pelvic lymphadenectomy using the sentinel lymph node procedure in patients with localised prostate carcinoma: a pilot study.

Authors:  Isabelle Brenot-Rossi; Cyril Bastide; Stephane Garcia; Stephane Dumas; Benjamin Esterni; Jacques Pasquier; Dominique Rossi
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2005-03-04       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  [Imaging diagnostics of advanced prostate cancer].

Authors:  A Kretschmer; M Seitz; A Graser; C G Stief; D Tilki
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2013-04       Impact factor: 0.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.