Literature DB >> 15249979

Cost-analysis of staging methods for lymph nodes in patients with prostate cancer: MRI with a lymph node-specific contrast agent compared to pelvic lymph node dissection or CT.

Anke M Hövels1, Roel A M Heesakkers, Eddy M Adang, Gerrit J Jager, Jelle O Barentsz.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to compare the costs of three strategies in patients with prostate cancer in a specific setting: firstly, a strategy including MR lymphography (MRL) in which pelvic lymph node dissection (PLND) is foregone in case of a negative result. The second strategy involves computed tomography (CT) followed by a biopsy or PLND. The third strategy consists of PLND without imaging beforehand. A decision analytic model was constructed. This model represented the diagnostic process for patients with prostate cancer and intermediate or high risk for nodal metastases, comparing the costs of the three strategies. Cost analysis was done from the health care perspective. The model indicated that the expected costs for the MRL strategy were 2,527 euro. The expected costs for the strategy using CT were 3,837 euro and for PLND 3,994 euro. These results show that potential savings performing MRL instead of CT were 1,310 euro and 1,467 euro for PLND. Sensitivity analyses show that variation in costs of PLND was most influential on the costs of all strategies. However, the overall savings pattern did not alter. Average costs of MRL staging in our institution are less than for CT and PLND in staging lymph nodes of patients with prostate cancer and who are intermediate or high risk for nodal metastases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2004        PMID: 15249979     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-004-2374-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  23 in total

1.  When is pelvic lymph node dissection necessary before radical prostatectomy? A decision analysis.

Authors:  M V Meng; P R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  Preoperative lymph node evaluation in prostatic cancer patients who are surgical candidates: the role of lymphangiography and computerized tomography scanning with directed fine needle aspiration.

Authors:  R C Flanigan; J L Mohler; C T King; J R Atwell; M A Umer; F K Loh; J W McRoberts
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1985-07       Impact factor: 7.450

3.  Transabdominal fine needle aspiration of retroperitoneal lymph nodes in staging of genitourinary tract cancer (correlation with lymphography and lymph node dissection findings).

Authors:  Z Wajsman; M Gamarra; J J Park; S Beckley; J E Pontes
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1982-12       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Staging of prostate cancer: results of Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group project comparison of three MR imaging techniques.

Authors:  C M Tempany; X Zhou; E A Zerhouni; M D Rifkin; L E Quint; C W Piccoli; J H Ellis; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 11.105

5.  T2-weighted MR imaging of prostate cancer: multishot echo-planar imaging vs fast spin-echo imaging.

Authors:  Tsutomu Tamada; Teruki Sone; Kiyohisa Nagai; Yoshimasa Jo; Masayuki Gyoten; Shigeki Imai; Yasumasa Kajihara; Masao Fukunaga
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2003-10-18       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Percutaneous pelvic lymph node aspiration in carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  R J Correa; C R Kidd; L Burnett; G E Brannen; R P Gibbons; K B Cummings
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 7.450

7.  Accuracy of combined computerized tomography and fine needle aspiration cytology in lymph node staging of localized prostatic carcinoma.

Authors:  H Van Poppel; F Ameye; R Oyen; W Van de Voorde; L Baert
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  The use and accuracy of cross-sectional imaging and fine needle aspiration cytology for detection of pelvic lymph node metastases before radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  J S Wolf; M Cher; M Dall'era; J C Presti; H Hricak; P R Carroll
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1995-03       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Computed tomography in the evaluation, staging, and therapy of carcinoma of the bladder and prostate.

Authors:  C L Morgan; R F Calkins; E J Cavalcanti
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1981-09       Impact factor: 11.105

10.  The accuracy of CT in the staging of carcinoma of the prostate.

Authors:  J F Platt; R L Bree; R E Schwab
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1987-08       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Individualized image-based lymph node irradiation for prostate cancer.

Authors:  Hanneke J M Meijer; Oscar A Debats; Emile N J Th van Lin; Marco van Vulpen; J Alfred Witjes; Wim J G Oyen; Jelle O Barentsz; Johannes H A M Kaanders
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2013-05-28       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  In vivo photoacoustic tomography of chemicals: high-resolution functional and molecular optical imaging at new depths.

Authors:  Chulhong Kim; Christopher Favazza; Lihong V Wang
Journal:  Chem Rev       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 60.622

3.  Complications of pelvic lymphadenectomy: do the risks outweigh the benefits?

Authors:  Stacy Loeb; Alan W Partin; Edward M Schaeffer
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2010

Review 4.  [Value of imaging for lymph node metastases from renal cell, bladder, prostate, penile, and testicular cancers].

Authors:  J Stattaus; A Bockisch; M Forsting; S P Müller
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2005-06       Impact factor: 0.639

5.  Cost effectiveness of coronary angiography and calcium scoring using CT and stress MRI for diagnosis of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Marc Dewey; Bernd Hamm
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2006-10-10       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 6.  Prostate cancer: diagnosis and staging.

Authors:  Nigel Borley; Mark R Feneley
Journal:  Asian J Androl       Date:  2008-12-01       Impact factor: 3.285

7.  Ultra-small superparamagnetic iron oxides for metastatic lymph node detection: back on the block.

Authors:  Ansje S Fortuin; Roger Brüggemann; Janine van der Linden; Ilia Panfilov; Bas Israël; Tom W J Scheenen; Jelle O Barentsz
Journal:  Wiley Interdiscip Rev Nanomed Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-04-06

Review 8.  Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System Version 2: Beyond Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Sung Yoon Park; Nam Hoon Cho; Dae Chul Jung; Young Taik Oh
Journal:  Korean J Radiol       Date:  2018-02-22       Impact factor: 3.500

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.