Literature DB >> 7535221

Auditory event-related potentials dissociate early and late memory processes.

L L Chao1, L Nielsen-Bohlman, R T Knight.   

Abstract

Event-related potentials (ERPs) to environmental sounds were recorded from 15 young control subjects in an auditory recognition memory task. Subjects listened to a continuous string of binaurally presented sounds, 20% of which were presented once and 80% were repeated. Of the repeated sounds, some repeated immediately after the initial presentation (2 sec; short delay repetition) while others repeated after 2-6 intervening sounds (4-12 sec; long delay repetition). Subjects were instructed to indicate whether they had heard the sounds before by pressing a "yes" or "no" button. The initial stimulus presentation and long delay repetition stimuli generated both an N4 component and a prolonged latency P3 component while the short delay repetition stimuli elicited no N4 component and an earlier latency P3 component. Subjects' responses were faster and more accurate for short delay repetition. All stimuli generated a sustained frontal negative component (SFN). These data indicate that auditory recognition memory for environmental sounds may involve two processes. The P3 generated by both short and long delay repetition stimuli may index activation of a neocortical template matching system. The N4 generated by initial stimulus presentations and long delay repetition is proposed to measure additional activation of limbic memory systems at long retention intervals.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7535221     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)00256-e

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  12 in total

1.  Local contextual processing of abstract and meaningful real-life images in professional athletes.

Authors:  Noa Fogelson; Miguel Fernandez-Del-Olmo; Rafael Martín Acero
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2012-03-20       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Role of frontal and parietal cortices in the control of bottom-up and top-down attention in humans.

Authors:  Ling Li; Caterina Gratton; Dezhong Yao; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Brain Res       Date:  2010-05-12       Impact factor: 3.252

3.  Prefrontal cortex is critical for contextual processing: evidence from brain lesions.

Authors:  Noa Fogelson; Mona Shah; Donatella Scabini; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2009-08-27       Impact factor: 13.501

4.  Cholinergic stimulation alters performance and task-specific regional cerebral blood flow during working memory.

Authors:  M L Furey; P Pietrini; J V Haxby; G E Alexander; H C Lee; J VanMeter; C L Grady; U Shetty; S I Rapoport; M B Schapiro; U Freo
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1997-06-10       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Dissociating linguistic and non-linguistic gesture processing: electrophysiological evidence from American Sign Language.

Authors:  Michael Grosvald; Eva Gutierrez; Sarah Hafer; David Corina
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2012-02-17       Impact factor: 2.381

6.  Early and late cortical responses to directly gazing faces are task dependent.

Authors:  Nicolas Burra; David Framorando; Alan J Pegna
Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 3.282

7.  Surprise? Early visual novelty processing is not modulated by attention.

Authors:  Elise C Tarbi; Xue Sun; Phillip J Holcomb; Kirk R Daffner
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2010-09-29       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Multimodal effects of local context on target detection: evidence from P3b.

Authors:  Noa Fogelson; Xue Wang; Jeffrey B Lewis; Mark M Kishiyama; Mingzhou Ding; Robert T Knight
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 3.225

9.  Electrophysiological evidence for aging effects on local contextual processing.

Authors:  Noa Fogelson; Mona Shah; Frederique Bonnet-Brilhault; Robert T Knight
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 4.027

10.  New insights into name category-related effects: is the Age of Acquisition a possible factor?

Authors:  Roberta Adorni; Alice Mado Proverbio
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 3.759

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.