Literature DB >> 29736681

Early and late cortical responses to directly gazing faces are task dependent.

Nicolas Burra1, David Framorando2, Alan J Pegna3.   

Abstract

Gender categorisation of human faces is facilitated when gaze is directed toward the observer (i.e., a direct gaze), compared with situations where gaze is averted or the eyes are closed (Macrae, Hood, Milne, Rowe, & Mason, Psychological Science, 13(5), 460-464, 2002). However, the temporal dynamics underlying this phenomenon remain to some extent unknown. Here, we used electroencephalography (EEG) to assess the neural correlates of this effect, focusing on the event-related potential (ERP) components known to be sensitive to gaze perception (i.e., P1, N170, and P3b). We first replicated the seminal findings of Macrae et al. (2002, Experiment 1) regarding facilitated gender discrimination, and subsequently measured the underlying neural responses. Our data revealed an early preferential processing of direct gaze as compared with averted gaze and closed eyes at the P1, which reverberated at the P3b (Experiment 2). Critically, using the same material, we failed to reproduce these effects when gender categorisation was not required (Experiment 3). Taken together, our data confirm that direct gaze enhances the early P1, as well as later cortical responses to face processing, although the effect appears to be task dependent.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Direct gaze; N170; P1; P3b; Task dependence

Mesh:

Year:  2018        PMID: 29736681     DOI: 10.3758/s13415-018-0605-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci        ISSN: 1530-7026            Impact factor:   3.282


  79 in total

1.  Modulation of event-related potentials by prototypical and atypical faces.

Authors:  H Halit; M de Haan; M H Johnson
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2000-06-26       Impact factor: 1.837

2.  An ERP study on the time course of emotional face processing.

Authors:  Martin Eimer; Amanda Holmes
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2002-03-25       Impact factor: 1.837

3.  Eyes first! Eye processing develops before face processing in children.

Authors:  M J Taylor; G E Edmonds; G McCarthy; T Allison
Journal:  Neuroreport       Date:  2001-06-13       Impact factor: 1.837

4.  Event-related P3a and P3b in response to unpredictable emotional stimuli.

Authors:  Sylvain Delplanque; Laetitia Silvert; Pascal Hot; Henrique Sequeira
Journal:  Biol Psychol       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.251

5.  Early face processing specificity: it's in the eyes!

Authors:  Roxane J Itier; Claude Alain; Katherine Sedore; Anthony R McIntosh
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  When eye creates the contact! ERP evidence for early dissociation between direct and averted gaze motion processing.

Authors:  Laurence Conty; Karim N'Diaye; Charles Tijus; Nathalie George
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2007-06-12       Impact factor: 3.139

7.  Double dissociation of configural and featural face processing on P1 and P2 components as a function of spatial attention.

Authors:  Hailing Wang; Shichun Guo; Shimin Fu
Journal:  Psychophysiology       Date:  2016-05-11       Impact factor: 4.016

8.  Event-related potentials reveal temporal staging of dynamic facial expression and gaze shift effects on attentional orienting.

Authors:  Harlan M Fichtenholtz; Joseph B Hopfinger; Reiko Graham; Jacqueline M Detwiler; Kevin S LaBar
Journal:  Soc Neurosci       Date:  2009-03-09       Impact factor: 2.083

9.  Neural correlates of generic versus gender-specific face adaptation.

Authors:  Nadine Kloth; Stefan R Schweinberger; Gyula Kovács
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 3.225

10.  Attention Capture by Direct Gaze is Robust to Context and Task Demands.

Authors:  Adam Palanica; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  J Nonverbal Behav       Date:  2012-06-01
View more
  4 in total

1.  Explicit vs. implicit spatial processing in arrow vs. eye-gaze spatial congruency effects.

Authors:  Cristina Narganes-Pineda; Ana B Chica; Juan Lupiáñez; Andrea Marotta
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2022-02-22

2.  Emotion, Gender and Gaze Discrimination Tasks do not Differentially Impact the Neural Processing of Angry or Happy Facial Expressions-a Mass Univariate ERP Analysis.

Authors:  Anna Hudson; Amie J Durston; Sarah D McCrackin; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.020

3.  Perceived Gaze Direction Differentially Affects Discrimination of Facial Emotion, Attention, and Gender - An ERP Study.

Authors:  Sarah D McCrackin; Roxane J Itier
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 4.677

4.  Contextually-Based Social Attention Diverges across Covert and Overt Measures.

Authors:  Effie J Pereira; Elina Birmingham; Jelena Ristic
Journal:  Vision (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-10
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.