Literature DB >> 7523727

National patterns of prostate cancer treatment by radical prostatectomy: results of a survey by the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer.

G P Murphy1, C Mettlin, H Menck, D P Winchester, A M Davidson.   

Abstract

To evaluate the patterns of use of radical prostatectomy for the treatment of prostate cancer in the United States, the American College of Surgeons Commission on Cancer in association with the American Cancer Society and American Urological Association surveyed 484 institutions concerning 2,122 patients treated in 1990. The results revealed that 93% of the patients were younger than 75 years when treated. Pretreatment prostate specific antigen level was greater than 4.0 ng./ml. in 85.4% of the patients. Surgical-pathological evaluation showed that 57.5% of the patients treated had American Joint Committee on Cancer pathological stages O, I and II corresponding to American Urological Association stages A1 to B2. Positive pathological findings, for example microscopic tumor extension or invasion, were associated with elevated prostate specific antigen levels at followup. The mortality rate associated with the operation was 0.7%. Impotence following treatment was observed in 56.6% of the patients who were potent preoperatively and complete incontinence was reported in 3.6% of the patients who were previously continent. The data may provide benchmarks by which further trends in prostate cancer treatment may be compared.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7523727     DOI: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)32392-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Urol        ISSN: 0022-5347            Impact factor:   7.450


  15 in total

1.  Selecting candidates for radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  H Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2000

Review 2.  Fiberoptic imaging for urologic surgery.

Authors:  Jeremy B Tuttle; William D Steers
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2009-01       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  Screening for prostate cancer: estimating the magnitude of overdetection.

Authors:  M McGregor; J A Hanley; J F Boivin; R G McLean
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-12-01       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Prevention. How much harm? How much benefit? 3. Physical, psychological and social harm.

Authors:  K G Marshall
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1996-07-15       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Racial Differences in Prostate Cancer Treatment: The Role of Socioeconomic Status.

Authors:  Megan Watson; David Grande; Archana Radhakrishnan; Nandita Mitra; Katelyn R Ward; Craig Evan Pollack
Journal:  Ethn Dis       Date:  2017-07-20       Impact factor: 1.847

6.  The risk of urinary retention following robot-assisted radical prostatectomy and its impact on early continence outcomes.

Authors:  Mansour Alnazari; Marc Zanaty; Khaled Ajib; Assaad El-Hakim; Kevin C Zorn
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 7.  The Gordon Wilson Lecture. Natural history and treatment of early stage prostate cancer.

Authors:  P T Scardino
Journal:  Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc       Date:  2000

Review 8.  Stage T1c prostate cancer: defining the appropriate staging evaluation and the role for pelvic lymphadenectomy.

Authors:  M C Beduschi; R Beduschi; J E Oesterling
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 4.226

9.  The prognostic value of p53 and DNA ploidy following radical prostatectomy.

Authors:  C Deliveliotis; A Skolarikos; A Karayannis; V Tzelepis; N Trakas; E Alargof; V Protogerou
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 4.226

10.  Multiphoton microscopy of prostate and periprostatic neural tissue: a promising imaging technique for improving nerve-sparing prostatectomy.

Authors:  Rajiv Yadav; Sushmita Mukherjee; Michael Hermen; Gerald Tan; Frederick R Maxfield; Watt W Webb; Ashutosh K Tewari
Journal:  J Endourol       Date:  2009-05       Impact factor: 2.942

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.