Literature DB >> 7513318

A user's guide for avoiding errors in absorbance image cytometry: a review with original experimental observations.

P Chieco1, A Jonker, C Melchiorri, G Vanni, C J Van Noorden.   

Abstract

The sources of errors which may occur when cytophotometric analysis is performed with video microscopy using a charged-coupled device (CCD) camera and image analysis are reviewed. The importance of these errors in practice has been tested, and ways of minimizing or avoiding them are described. Many of these sources of error are known from scanning and integrating cytophotometry; they include the use of white instead of monochromatic light, the distribution error, glare, diffraction, shading distortion, and inadequate depth of field. Sources of errors specifically linked with video microscopy or image analysis are highlighted as well; these errors include blooming, limited dynamic range of grey levels, non-linear responses of the camera, contrast transfer, photon noise, dark current, read-out noise, fixed scene noise and spatial calibration. Glare, contrast transfer, fixed scene noise, depth of field and spatial calibration seem to be the most serious sources of errors when measurements are not carried out correctly. We include a table summarizing all the errors discussed in this review and procedures for avoiding them. It can be concluded that if accurate calibration steps are performed and proper guidelines followed, image cytometry can be applied safely for quantifying amounts of chromophore per cell or per unit volume of tissue in sections, even when relatively simple and inexpensive instrumentation is being used.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7513318

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Histochem J        ISSN: 0018-2214


  30 in total

1.  Accuracy of optical density measurement of cells. 1: Low resolution.

Authors:  A W Smeulders; T K Kate
Journal:  Appl Opt       Date:  1987-08-15       Impact factor: 1.980

Review 2.  Quantitative perimeter and area measurements of digital images.

Authors:  J Barba; K S Chan; J Gil
Journal:  Microsc Res Tech       Date:  1992-06-01       Impact factor: 2.769

3.  Aspects of scanning microdensitometry. III. The monochromator system.

Authors:  D J Goldstein
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1975-09       Impact factor: 1.758

4.  Characterization of low-light-level cameras for digitized video microscopy.

Authors:  T T Tsay; R Inman; B Wray; B Herman; K Jacobson
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1990-11       Impact factor: 1.758

5.  Sampling density and quantitative microscopy.

Authors:  I T Young
Journal:  Anal Quant Cytol Histol       Date:  1988-08       Impact factor: 0.302

6.  High resolution shading correction.

Authors:  M L Schultz; L E Lipkin; M J Wade; P F Lemkin; G M Carman
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.479

7.  A charge coupled device-based image cytophotometry system for quantitative histochemistry and cytochemistry.

Authors:  R M Donovan; E Goldstein
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Microdensitometry with image analyser video scanners.

Authors:  L R Jarvis
Journal:  J Microsc       Date:  1981-03       Impact factor: 1.758

9.  A multifaced DNA ploidy analysis to determine ovarian carcinoma aggressiveness.

Authors:  P Chieco; C Melchiorri; G Lisignoli; A Marabini; C Orlandi
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1991-04-01       Impact factor: 6.860

Review 10.  Errors in microdensitometry.

Authors:  D J Goldstein
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1981-03
View more
  17 in total

1.  Effects of ischaemia and reperfusion on NADH coenzyme Q reductase activity in rat liver.

Authors:  W M Frederiks; K S Bosch; H Vreeling-Sindelárová
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1999-09

2.  Comparison of different detection methods in quantitative microdensitometry.

Authors:  L Ermert; A C Hocke; H R Duncker; W Seeger; M Ermert
Journal:  Am J Pathol       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.307

Review 3.  Imaging enzymes at work: metabolic mapping by enzyme histochemistry.

Authors:  Cornelis J F Van Noorden
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 2.479

4.  Microfluorometric kinetic analysis of cathepsin B activity in single human thyroid follicular epithelial cells using image analysis and continuous monitoring.

Authors:  L Kayser; H Perrild; J Thomsen; P E Høyer
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1996-04

5.  Glucose-6-phosphate dehydrogenase activity in spinach as measured by image analysis: a new approach for plant enzyme histochemistry.

Authors:  M Crèvecoeur; M B Cissé; X Albe; H Greppin
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1996-01

Review 6.  Basic strategies for valid cytometry using image analysis.

Authors:  A Jonker; W J Geerts; P Chieco; A F Moorman; W H Lamers; C J Van Noorden
Journal:  Histochem J       Date:  1997-05

7.  An innovative method for obtaining consistent images and quantification of histochemically stained specimens.

Authors:  Michael A Linden; Gerald J Sedgewick; Marna Ericson
Journal:  J Histochem Cytochem       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 2.479

8.  Neutral endopeptidase (EC 3.4.24.11) downregulates the onset of intestinal inflammation in the nematode infected mouse.

Authors:  G Barbara; R De Giorgio; V Stanghellini; R Corinaldesi; C Cremon; N Gerard; C Gerard; E F Grady; N W Bunnett; P A Blennerhassett; S M Collins
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 23.059

9.  The prognostic IDH1( R132 ) mutation is associated with reduced NADP+-dependent IDH activity in glioblastoma.

Authors:  Fonnet E Bleeker; Nadia A Atai; Simona Lamba; Ard Jonker; Denise Rijkeboer; Klazien S Bosch; Wikky Tigchelaar; Dirk Troost; W Peter Vandertop; Alberto Bardelli; Cornelis J F Van Noorden
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2010-02-04       Impact factor: 17.088

10.  Entamoeba histolytica and E. dispar trophozoites in the liver of hamsters: in vivo binding of antibodies and complement.

Authors:  Cássia Ax Costa; Alvaro C Nunes; Anderson J Ferreira; Maria A Gomes; Marcelo V Caliari
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2010-03-26       Impact factor: 3.876

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.