Literature DB >> 7511518

The polarity of the induced electric field influences magnetic coil inhibition of human visual cortex: implications for the site of excitation.

V E Amassian1, P J Maccabee, R Q Cracco, J B Cracco, M Somasundaram, J C Rothwell, L Eberle, K Henry, A P Rudell.   

Abstract

Human perception of 3 briefly flashed letters in a horizontal array that subtends a visual angle of 3 degrees or less is reduced by a magnetic coil (MC) pulse given, e.g., 90 msec later. Either a round or a double square MC is effective when the lower windings or central junction region, respectively, are tangential to the skull overlying calcarine cortex and symmetrical across the midline. The modeled, induced electric field has peak amplitude at the midline, but the peak spatial derivatives lie many centimeters laterally. Thus, the foveal representation near the midline is closer to the peak electric field than to its peak spatial derivatives, i.e., excitation of calcarine cortex differs from excitation of a straight nerve. With an MC pulse that induces an electric field which is substantially monophasic in amplitude, the lateral-most letter (usually the right-hand letter) in the trigram is preferentially suppressed when the electric field in the contralateral occipital lobe is directed towards the midline. Inferences from using peripheral nerve models imply that medially located bends in geniculo-calcarine or corticofugal fibers are the relevant sites of excitation in visual suppression; end excitation of fiber arborizations or apical dendrites is considered less likely. This conclusion is supported by the fact that the induced electric field polarity in paracentral lobule for optimally eliciting foot movements is opposite to that for visual suppression, the major bends occurring at different portions of the fiber trajectories in the two systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7511518     DOI: 10.1016/0168-5597(94)90087-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0013-4694


  14 in total

1.  Evaluation of an image-guided, robotically positioned transcranial magnetic stimulation system.

Authors:  Jack L Lancaster; Shalini Narayana; Dennis Wenzel; James Luckemeyer; John Roby; Peter Fox
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Where does transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) stimulate? Modelling of induced field maps for some common cortical and cerebellar targets.

Authors:  Janine D Bijsterbosch; Anthony T Barker; Kwang-Hyuk Lee; P W R Woodruff
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2012-06-08       Impact factor: 2.602

3.  Masking visual stimuli by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer
Journal:  Psychol Res       Date:  2006-04-27

4.  Interhemispheric transfer of phosphenes generated by occipital versus parietal transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Carlo A Marzi; Francesca Mancini; Silvia Savazzi
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2008-07-29       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Evoked potentials in large-scale cortical networks elicited by TMS of the visual cortex.

Authors:  Javier O Garcia; Emily D Grossman; Ramesh Srinivasan
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2011-06-29       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  Retinal and visual cortex distance from transcranial magnetic stimulation of the vertex affects phosphene perception.

Authors:  Kelly Webster; Tony Ro
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2017-07-04       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  Manipulation of phosphene thresholds by transcranial direct current stimulation in man.

Authors:  Andrea Antal; Tamás Z Kincses; Michael A Nitsche; Walter Paulus
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2003-04-16       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation in the visual system. II. Characterization of induced phosphenes and scotomas.

Authors:  Thomas Kammer; Klaas Puls; Michael Erb; Wolfgang Grodd
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Spike suppression in a local cortical circuit induced by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Yoichi Miyawaki; Takashi Shinozaki; Masato Okada
Journal:  J Comput Neurosci       Date:  2012-05-16       Impact factor: 1.621

10.  Targeting of white matter tracts with transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Aapo Nummenmaa; Jennifer A McNab; Peter Savadjiev; Yoshio Okada; Matti S Hämäläinen; Ruopeng Wang; Lawrence L Wald; Alvaro Pascual-Leone; Van J Wedeen; Tommi Raij
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 8.955

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.