Literature DB >> 7506853

Prospective evaluation of prostate-specific antigen density and systematic biopsies for early detection of prostatic carcinoma.

M Bazinet1, A W Meshref, C Trudel, S Aronson, F Péloquin, M Nachabe, L R Bégin, M M Elhilali.   

Abstract

Significant controversies persist in regard to the need for systematic biopsies in patients with serum prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels above 4 ng/mL (Hybritech assay), especially if they show no signs of prostatic cancer on digital rectal examination (DRE) or transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS). We evaluated 565 consecutive patients referred to us for prostatism, suspicious lesions on DRE, or an elevated serum PSA level. These patients do not represent a purely screened population. A detection rate of 38.4 percent was achieved by performing directed biopsies of suspicious lesions on DRE and/or TRUS, and systematic biopsies of all patients with serum PSA levels above 4 ng/mL. Among 142 patients with serum PSA between 4.1 and 10 ng/mL, but without suspicion for cancer on DRE and TRUS (DRE- TRUS-), a large number of patients (6.2) were subjected to systematic biopsies to detect one cancer. A receiver-operating characteristics curve for PSA density (PSAD) applied to this population confirmed that the best cut-off point for biopsies was a PSAD of 0.15, below which only two of twenty-three cancers would have been missed, sparing biopsies in 77 of 142 patients. A similar approach was applied to DRE- TRUS- patients with serum PSA levels above 10 ng/mL. The number of cancers in those with serum PSA between 10.1 and 14 ng/mL was too low to establish a PSAD cut-off point. In patients with serum PSA above 14 ng/mL, the best PSAD cut-off point for biopsies was 0.3, below which two of thirteen cancers would have been missed, sparing biopsies in 19 of 39 patients. We conclude that PSAD can safely reduce the number of patients subjected to systematic biopsies without significantly compromising cancer detection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1994        PMID: 7506853     DOI: 10.1016/s0090-4295(94)80260-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Urology        ISSN: 0090-4295            Impact factor:   2.649


  20 in total

Review 1.  The role of prostate specific antigen in screening and management of clinically localized prostate cancer.

Authors:  Khurshid Guru; Ashutosh Tewari; Ashok K Hemal; John Wei; Javid Javidan; James Peabody; Mani Menon
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 2.  Prostate kallikrein markers in diagnosis, risk stratification and prognosis.

Authors:  David Ulmert; M Frank O'Brien; Anders S Bjartell; Hans Lilja
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 3.  Prostate cancer: 5. Diagnostic tools for early detection.

Authors:  P I Karakiewicz; A G Aprikian
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 4.  Screening and Detection of Prostate Cancer-Review of Literature and Current Perspective.

Authors:  Ananthakrishnan Sivaraman; Kulthe Ramesh Seetharam Bhat
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2017-01-23

5.  Association of serum EPCA-2 level with prostate cancer in Chinese Han population.

Authors:  Lei Wang; Ling Ma; Xinli Wang; Bing Li; Shan Guo; Qingdong Qiao
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Pathol       Date:  2015-08-01

6.  Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, free-to-total PSA ratio and a new formula (prostate malignancy index) for detecting prostate cancer and preventing negative biopsies in patients with normal rectal examinations and intermediate PSA levels.

Authors:  C Dinçel; T Caşkurlu; A I Taşçi; M Cek; G Sevin; A Fazlioğlu
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.370

7.  Between-subject variations of transition zone epithelial volume and serum PSA levels in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.

Authors:  Martella Oreste; Paradiso Galatioto Giuseppe; Pace Gianna; Angelucci Adriano; Necozione Stefano; Bologna Mauro; Vicentini Carlo
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2009-08-19       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  Interactions between benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) and prostate cancer in large prostates: a retrospective data review.

Authors:  Shadi Al-Khalil; David Boothe; Trey Durdin; Sowmya Sunkara; Phillip Watkins; Shengping Yang; Allan Haynes; Werner de Riese
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2015-11-21       Impact factor: 2.370

9.  Role of PSA density in diagnosis of prostate cancer in obese men.

Authors:  Peter Ka-Fung Chiu; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Samson Yun-Sang Chan; Peggy Sau-Kwan Chu; Chi-Wai Man; See-Ming Hou; Chi-Fai Ng
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 10.  Screening for prostate cancer.

Authors:  M L Cher; P R Carroll
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1995-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.