Literature DB >> 10668945

Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen (PSA), PSA density, free-to-total PSA ratio and a new formula (prostate malignancy index) for detecting prostate cancer and preventing negative biopsies in patients with normal rectal examinations and intermediate PSA levels.

C Dinçel1, T Caşkurlu, A I Taşçi, M Cek, G Sevin, A Fazlioğlu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To improve the specificity and sensitivity of prostatic cancer detection, we prospectively evaluated total prostate specific antigen (PSA) level, PSA density, free-to-total PSA ratio and a new formula called prostate malignancy index (PMI) as a discriminator of prostate cancer in patients with intermediate PSA levels and normal digital rectal examinations.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Between November 1995 and October 1997, 95 patients who had serum PSA levels of 4.0 to 10.0 ng/ml with normal digital rectal examinations were prospectively evaluated. All patients underwent one or two times transrectal ultrasound guided prostate biopsies. Based on age specific reference range of PSA, PSA density and % free PSA ratio, PMI was calculated for each patient. The free and total serum PSA concentrations were determined by an Immulite assay system. (Diagnostic Product Corp., Los Angeles, California).
RESULTS: Overall 20 of 95 (21%) patients had prostate cancer. There were no significant differences in patient mean age and mean total PSA between those with benign and those with malignant biopsies (p>0.05). However, there were significant differences in mean PSAD, mean free-to-total PSA ratio and mean PMI (p<0.01, p<0.05, p<0.01, respectively). Benign condition specificities for PM index, percent free PSA, PSA density and total PSA at a 90% sensitivity for prostate cancer were 48%, 10.6%, 8% and 4%, respectively. Of 95 patients, 27 (28.4%) had a PMI of equal or more than 3.1, including 12 of 75 (16%) with negative biopsy and 15 of 20 (75%) with positive biopsy. Furthermore a cutoff MI 0.86 P correctly identified 24% of benign cases without missing any prostate cancer cases. The comparison of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve areas showed that PMI was better than total PSA (p<0.01). Although, the area under the ROC curve of % free PSA and PSAD were higher than the area of total PSA, these differences were not statistically significant (p>0.05).
CONCLUSIONS: We concluded that the prostate malignancy index could be utilized to differentiate benign conditions from prostate cancer in patients with intermediate PSA levels and normal digital rectal examination. Also significant numbers of negative biopsies can be prevented in these patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1999        PMID: 10668945     DOI: 10.1023/a:1007167328877

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  21 in total

Review 1.  Prospective evaluation of prostate specific antigen density and systematic biopsy for detecting prostate cancer in Japanese patients with normal rectal examinations and intermediate prostate specific antigen levels.

Authors:  Y Arai; H Maeda; S Ishitoya; K Okubo; T Okada; Y Aoki
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1997-09       Impact factor: 7.450

2.  PSA velocity for the diagnosis of early prostate cancer. A new concept.

Authors:  H B Carter; J D Pearson
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.241

3.  A method of comparing the areas under receiver operating characteristic curves derived from the same cases.

Authors:  J A Hanley; B J McNeil
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1983-09       Impact factor: 11.105

4.  A complex between prostate-specific antigen and alpha 1-antichymotrypsin is the major form of prostate-specific antigen in serum of patients with prostatic cancer: assay of the complex improves clinical sensitivity for cancer.

Authors:  U H Stenman; J Leinonen; H Alfthan; S Rannikko; K Tuhkanen; O Alfthan
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1991-01-01       Impact factor: 12.701

5.  Influence of patient age on the serum PSA concentration. An important clinical observation.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; W H Cooner; S J Jacobsen; H A Guess; M M Lieber
Journal:  Urol Clin North Am       Date:  1993-11       Impact factor: 2.241

6.  The value of screening tests in the detection of prostate cancer. Part II: Retrospective analysis of free/total prostate-specific analysis ratio, age-specific reference ranges, and PSA density.

Authors:  C H Bangma; R Kranse; B G Blijenberg; F H Schröder
Journal:  Urology       Date:  1995-12       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Prostate specific antigen density: a means of distinguishing benign prostatic hypertrophy and prostate cancer.

Authors:  M C Benson; I S Whang; A Pantuck; K Ring; S A Kaplan; C A Olsson; W H Cooner
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 7.450

8.  Comparison of digital rectal examination and serum prostate specific antigen in the early detection of prostate cancer: results of a multicenter clinical trial of 6,630 men.

Authors:  William J Catalona; Jerome P Richie; Frederick R Ahmann; M'Liss A Hudson; Peter T Scardino; Robert C Flanigan; Jean B DeKernion; Timothy L Ratliff; Louis R Kavoussi; Bruce L Dalkin; W Bedford Waters; Michael T MacFarlane; Paula C Southwick
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 7.450

9.  Serum prostate-specific antigen in a community-based population of healthy Japanese men: lower values than for similarly aged white men.

Authors:  J E Oesterling; Y Kumamoto; T Tsukamoto; C J Girman; H A Guess; N Masumori; S J Jacobsen; M M Lieber
Journal:  Br J Urol       Date:  1995-03

10.  Evaluation of percentage of free serum prostate-specific antigen to improve specificity of prostate cancer screening.

Authors:  W J Catalona; D S Smith; R L Wolfert; T J Wang; H G Rittenhouse; T L Ratliff; R B Nadler
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1995-10-18       Impact factor: 56.272

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.