Literature DB >> 7501876

Characterizing perception of ecological risk.

T McDaniels1, L J Axelrod, P Slovic.   

Abstract

Relatively little attention has been paid to the role of human perception and judgment in ecological risk management. This paper attempts to characterize perceived ecological risk, using the psychometric paradigm developed in the domain of human health risk perception. The research began by eliciting a set of scale characteristics and risk items (e.g., technologies, actions, events, beliefs) from focus group participants. Participants in the main study were 68 university students who completed a survey instrument that elicited ratings for each of 65 items on 30 characteristic scales and one scale regarding general risk to natural environments. The results are presented in terms of mean responses over individuals for each scale and item combination. Factor analyses show that five factors characterize the judgment data. These have been termed: impact on species, human benefits, impact on humans, avoidability, and knowledge of impacts. The factor results correspond with initial expectations and provide a plausible characterization of judgments regarding ecological risk. Some comparisons of mean responses for selected individual items are also presented.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7501876     DOI: 10.1111/j.1539-6924.1995.tb00754.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Risk Anal        ISSN: 0272-4332            Impact factor:   4.000


  15 in total

1.  Public perception of blue-algae bloom risk in Hongze Lake of China.

Authors:  Lei Huang; Kai Sun; Jie Ban; Jun Bi
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2010-04-10       Impact factor: 3.266

2.  Perceiving land-degrading activities from the lay perspective in northern China.

Authors:  Harry F Lee; David D Zhang
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 3.266

3.  Factors influencing acquisition of ecological and exposure information about hazards and risks from contaminated sites.

Authors:  Joanna Burger; Michael Greenberg; Michael Gochfeld; Sheila Shukla; Karen Lowrie; Roger Keren
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-07-11       Impact factor: 2.513

4.  Product quality risk perceptions and decisions: contaminated pet food and lead-painted toys.

Authors:  Tianjun Feng; L Robin Keller; Liangyan Wang; Yitong Wang
Journal:  Risk Anal       Date:  2010-10       Impact factor: 4.000

5.  Total cost of risk for privatized electric power generation under pipeline vandalism.

Authors:  S C Nwanya; C A Mgbemene; C C Ezeoke; O C Iloeje
Journal:  Heliyon       Date:  2018-07-24

6.  How do the Chinese perceive ecological risk in freshwater lakes?

Authors:  Lei Huang; Yuting Han; Ying Zhou; Heinz Gutscher; Jun Bi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  A study of the perception of health risks among college students in China.

Authors:  Chenggang Zhang; Jingbo Fan
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2013-05-27       Impact factor: 3.390

8.  Effects of news frames on perceived risk, emotions, and learning.

Authors:  Christine Otieno; Hans Spada; Alexander Renkl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-04       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Expert views on regulatory preparedness for managing the risks of nanotechnologies.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-11-11       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Scientists versus regulators: precaution, novelty & regulatory oversight as predictors of perceived risks of engineered nanomaterials.

Authors:  Christian E H Beaudrie; Terre Satterfield; Milind Kandlikar; Barbara H Harthorn
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-09-15       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.