PURPOSE: To clarify pathological predictor for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four patients who underwent surgery for single T1 colorectal cancer were reviewed. The pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation, invasion depth (> or =2 000 microm), lymphatic channel involvement, venous invasion, and tumor budding were selected as candidate predictors. Tumor budding was estimated according to the definition proposed by Ueno et al. (Gastroenterology 2004; 127:385-394). The lymph node status was set for the endpoint. Logistic regression model was applied to analyze the predictors. RESULTS: Lymph node involvement was observed in 9.8%. The positive rates were 13.4% for the pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation, 51.8% for invasion depth (> or =2 000 microm), 6.1% for lymphatic channel involvement, 8.5% for venous invasion, and 14.6% for tumor budding. The pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation (P < 0.001) and tumor budding (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in multivariate analysis. When either two significant factors was adopted for the prediction of the lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94%, 82%, 36%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation and tumor budding are useful predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.
PURPOSE: To clarify pathological predictor for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer. METHODS: One hundred and sixty-four patients who underwent surgery for single T1 colorectal cancer were reviewed. The pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation, invasion depth (> or =2 000 microm), lymphatic channel involvement, venous invasion, and tumor budding were selected as candidate predictors. Tumor budding was estimated according to the definition proposed by Ueno et al. (Gastroenterology 2004; 127:385-394). The lymph node status was set for the endpoint. Logistic regression model was applied to analyze the predictors. RESULTS: Lymph node involvement was observed in 9.8%. The positive rates were 13.4% for the pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation, 51.8% for invasion depth (> or =2 000 microm), 6.1% for lymphatic channel involvement, 8.5% for venous invasion, and 14.6% for tumor budding. The pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation (P < 0.001) and tumor budding (P = 0.002) were significantly associated with lymph node metastasis in multivariate analysis. When either two significant factors was adopted for the prediction of the lymph node metastasis, the sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value were 94%, 82%, 36%, and 99%, respectively. CONCLUSION: The pathological differentiations of non-well differentiation and tumor budding are useful predictors for lymph node metastasis in T1 colorectal cancer.
Authors: S Tanaka; K Haruma; C R Teixeira; S Tatsuta; N Ohtsu; Y Hiraga; M Yoshihara; K Sumii; G Kajiyama; F Shimamoto Journal: J Gastroenterol Date: 1995-12 Impact factor: 7.527
Authors: R J Schlemper; R H Riddell; Y Kato; F Borchard; H S Cooper; S M Dawsey; M F Dixon; C M Fenoglio-Preiser; J F Fléjou; K Geboes; T Hattori; T Hirota; M Itabashi; M Iwafuchi; A Iwashita; Y I Kim; T Kirchner; M Klimpfinger; M Koike; G Y Lauwers; K J Lewin; G Oberhuber; F Offner; A B Price; C A Rubio; M Shimizu; T Shimoda; P Sipponen; E Solcia; M Stolte; H Watanabe; H Yamabe Journal: Gut Date: 2000-08 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: P Netzer; C Forster; R Biral; C Ruchti; J Neuweiler; E Stauffer; R Schönegg; C Maurer; J Hüsler; F Halter; A Schmassmann Journal: Gut Date: 1998-11 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: H S Cooper; L M Deppisch; W K Gourley; E I Kahn; R Lev; P N Manley; R R Pascal; A H Qizilbash; R R Rickert; J F Silverman Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 1995-06 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: F Bianco; A Arezzo; F Agresta; C Coco; R Faletti; Z Krivocapic; G Rotondano; G A Santoro; N Vettoretto; S De Franciscis; A Belli; G M Romano Journal: Tech Coloproctol Date: 2015-09-24 Impact factor: 3.781
Authors: Lars Boenicke; Martin Fein; Marco Sailer; Christoph Isbert; Christoph-Tomas Germer; Andreas Thalheimer Journal: Int J Colorectal Dis Date: 2009-11-06 Impact factor: 2.571