Literature DB >> 7495597

Breast cancer screening behaviors and intentions among asymptomatic women 50 years of age and older.

L C Friedman1, A Woodruff, M Lane, A D Weinberg, H P Cooper, J A Webb.   

Abstract

We examined predictors of (1) compliance with yearly mammography and clinical breast examination (CBE) and (2) intention to obtain mammography and CBE within the following year. Subjects were 312 asymptomatic female hospital employees, 50 years or older, who had participated in a free worksite breast cancer screening program. Mammograms and CBEs had been obtained by 79% and 76% of the subjects, respectively, during the preceding 12 months. The majority of the subjects indicated that they were very/extremely likely to obtain a mammogram and CBE in the next 12 months (88% and 87%, respectively). Multivariate analyses showed that perceived barriers to and physician recommendation of mammography were the strongest predictors of both breast cancer screening behaviors and intentions. Recency of participation in the educational component of the screening program was related to both compliance with mammography in the past 12 months and intention to obtain CBE in the next year. Having a first-degree female relative with a history of breast cancer was related to compliance with CBE in the past 12 months. Perceived efficacy of mammography was related to intention to obtain both mammography and CBE in the next year, and number of reasons for mammography was related to intention to obtain mammography in the next year. Our results suggest that physicians play a key role in motivating women to comply with breast cancer screening and that reducing barriers to obtaining mammography may increase use further.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7495597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Prev Med        ISSN: 0749-3797            Impact factor:   5.043


  17 in total

1.  Predictors of mammography use among Canadian women aged 50-69: findings from the 1996/97 National Population Health Survey.

Authors:  C J Maxwell; C M Bancej; J Snider
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2001-02-06       Impact factor: 8.262

2.  Lower adherence to screening mammography guidelines among ethnic minority women in America: a meta-analytic review.

Authors:  Rebecca J Purc-Stephenson; Kevin M Gorey
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Mammography using in a community-based sample of older women.

Authors:  J T Fullerton; D Kritz-Silverstein; G Robins Sadler; E Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Ann Behav Med       Date:  1996-03

4.  Breast cancer risk and provider recommendation for mammography among recently unscreened women in the United States.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Risa B Burns; Roger B Davis; Russell S Phillips; Ellen P McCarthy
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2006-04       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Redesigning primary care processes to improve the offering of mammography. The use of clinic protocols by nonphysicians.

Authors:  B D McCarthy; M U Yood; M B Bolton; E A Boohaker; C H MacWilliam; M J Young
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-06       Impact factor: 5.128

6.  Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing Factors Associated with Mammography Referrals in U.S. Primary Care Practices.

Authors:  Susan A Sabatino; Trevor Thompson; Steven S Coughlin; Susan M Schappert
Journal:  Open Health Serv Policy J       Date:  2009-01-01

7.  How do obstetric providers discuss referrals for prenatal genetic counseling?

Authors:  Barbara A Bernhardt; Carrie Mastromarino Haunstetter; Debra Roter; Gail Geller
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.537

8.  Mammography rates for 20 community-based family practices in Ontario: a full practice audit.

Authors:  J Graham Swanson; Janusz Kaczorowski
Journal:  Can J Public Health       Date:  2007 Sep-Oct

9.  Sexual orientation and intentions to obtain breast cancer screening.

Authors:  Stacey L Hart; Deborah J Bowen
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2009-02       Impact factor: 2.681

10.  Comparison of the screening practices of unaffected noncarriers under 40 and between 40 and 49 in BRCA1/2 families.

Authors:  Christelle Duprez; Véronique Christophe; Isabelle Milhabet; Aurélie Krzeminski; Claude Adenis; Pascaline Berthet; Jean-Philippe Peyrat; Philippe Vennin
Journal:  J Genet Couns       Date:  2013-01-25       Impact factor: 2.537

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.