Literature DB >> 20369031

Predisposing, Enabling, and Reinforcing Factors Associated with Mammography Referrals in U.S. Primary Care Practices.

Susan A Sabatino1, Trevor Thompson, Steven S Coughlin, Susan M Schappert.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: We examined how predisposing, enabling and reinforcing factors influence mammography referrals by primary care physicians (PCPs).
METHODS: Using the 2001-2003 National Ambulatory Medical Care and National Hospital Ambulatory Medical Care Surveys, we identified visits to office (n=8,756) and outpatient (n=17,067) PCPs by women≥40 without breast symptoms or breast cancer. We examined mammography referrals by predisposing (age, race, ethnicity, education, chronic problem), enabling (income, payer, visits within 12 months, time with physician), and reinforcing factors (physician age, gender, specialty/clinic, PCP status, region, MSA, solo/group practice). Gender, specialty, physician age, time with physician and solo/group were only in NAMCS. Clinic type was only in NHAMCS. We fitted logistic regression models adjusted for all factors and year.
RESULTS: Office-based referrals were more likely during visits: for preventive or chronic care; with private payer vs self/uninsured; by women with no visit within 12 months vs≥3; lasting≥15 minutes; to female PCPs; to PCPs aged ≥45; to gynecologists. Outpatient referrals were more likely during visits: by Hispanics; for preventive or chronic care; by women with no visit within 12 months; to one's own PCP; to gynecologic clinics; in the Northeast or Midwest.
CONCLUSIONS: Reinforcing factors, in addition to predisposing and enabling factors, are associated with mammography referral. Interventions to increase referrals should consider provider factors and aspects of the healthcare environment, and recognize differences between settings. Efforts to facilitate referrals during chronic care visits or outpatient visits to non-PCP providers may provide opportunities to increase screening. Efforts are needed to ensure that uninsured women are receiving appropriate referrals.

Entities:  

Year:  2009        PMID: 20369031      PMCID: PMC2848507          DOI: 10.2174/1874924000902020057

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Open Health Serv Policy J


  36 in total

1.  Variations in approaches to breast cancer screening among primary care physicians.

Authors:  Andrew B Symons; Martin C Mahoney; Jessica Englert; Amy L Mirand
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Conflicting national recommendations and the use of screening mammography: does the physician's recommendation matter?

Authors:  S H Taplin; N Urban; V M Taylor; J Savarino
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  1997 Mar-Apr

3.  Primary care and receipt of preventive services.

Authors:  A B Bindman; K Grumbach; D Osmond; K Vranizan; A L Stewart
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 5.128

4.  Adherence of low-income women to cancer screening recommendations.

Authors:  Ann S O'Malley; Christopher B Forrest; Jeanne Mandelblatt
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2002-02       Impact factor: 5.128

5.  Progress in cancer screening practices in the United States: results from the 2000 National Health Interview Survey.

Authors:  Judith Swan; Nancy Breen; Ralph J Coates; Barbara K Rimer; Nancy C Lee
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 6.860

6.  Clinical decision-making and mammography referral.

Authors:  K E Grady; J P Lemkau; J M McVay; S Carlson; N Lee; M Minchella; C Caddell
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1996 May-Jun       Impact factor: 4.018

7.  Competing demands in the office visit: what influences mammography recommendations?

Authors:  P A Nutting; M Baier; J J Werner; G Cutter; C Conry; L Stewart
Journal:  J Am Board Fam Pract       Date:  2001 Sep-Oct

8.  Screening mammography referral rates for women ages 50 to 69 years by recently-licensed family physicians: physician and practice environment correlates.

Authors:  J Haggerty; R Tamblyn; M Abrahamowicz; M D Beaulieu; N Kishchuk
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 4.018

9.  Are patients more likely to see physicians of the same sex? Recent national trends in primary care medicine.

Authors:  Margaret C Fang; Ellen P McCarthy; Daniel E Singer
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2004-10-15       Impact factor: 4.965

10.  Breast cancer screening behaviors and intentions among asymptomatic women 50 years of age and older.

Authors:  L C Friedman; A Woodruff; M Lane; A D Weinberg; H P Cooper; J A Webb
Journal:  Am J Prev Med       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 5.043

View more
  3 in total

1.  The "Welcome to Medicare" visit: a missed opportunity for cancer screening among women?

Authors:  Ramzi G Salloum; Gail A Jensen; Andrea K Biddle
Journal:  J Womens Health (Larchmt)       Date:  2012-11-12       Impact factor: 2.681

2.  A new marker of primary care utilization - annual accumulated duration of time of visits.

Authors:  Talya A Nathan; Arnon D Cohen; Shlomo Vinker
Journal:  Isr J Health Policy Res       Date:  2017-08-10

3.  Patient and physician characteristics affect adherence to screening mammography: A population-based cohort study.

Authors:  Daniela Katz; Angela J Tengekyon; Natan R Kahan; Ronit Calderon-Margalit
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-03-27       Impact factor: 3.240

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.