Literature DB >> 26923620

A low-cost system for coil tracking during transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Edward P Washabaugh1,2, Chandramouli Krishnan1,3,2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Accurate coil placement over a target area is critical during transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS), as small deviations can alter testing outcomes. Accordingly, frameless stereotaxic systems (FSS) are recommended for reliable coil placement during TMS applications. However, FSS is not practical due to the cost associated with procuring such systems. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to develop a low-cost TMS coil tracking approach using simple webcams and an image processing algorithm in LabVIEW Vision Assistant.
METHODS: A system was created using two webcams, retroreflective markers, and computer stereovision, for tracking the TMS coil over a target area. Accuracy of the system was validated in both the global and local reference frames, while repeatability was measured within- and between-days for placement of the TMS coil over the target area relative to the head. The feasibility of our system was also verified by collecting motor evoked potentials (MEPs) of first dorsal interosseous muscle from human subjects.
RESULTS: The results of this study indicated that the system was highly accurate and repeatable, and could track the coil position with <5 mm error and orientation <1.1° error from the target. We also observed larger and more consistent MEPs when stimulating the brain using feedback from the coil tracking system than when the examiner attempted to stimulate without any feedback.
CONCLUSION: The findings suggest that webcam-based coil tracking is a feasible low-cost solution to track coil positions during TMS procedures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neuronavigation; motion tracking; motor mapping; real time; stereotaxy

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26923620      PMCID: PMC5737019          DOI: 10.3233/RNN-150609

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci        ISSN: 0922-6028            Impact factor:   2.406


  29 in total

1.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation and the challenge of coil placement: a comparison of conventional and stereotaxic neuronavigational strategies.

Authors:  Roland Sparing; Dorothee Buelte; Ingo G Meister; Tomás Paus; Gereon R Fink
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 5.038

Review 2.  Transcranial magnetic stimulation: a primer.

Authors:  Mark Hallett
Journal:  Neuron       Date:  2007-07-19       Impact factor: 17.173

3.  Modulation of muscle responses evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation during the acquisition of new fine motor skills.

Authors:  A Pascual-Leone; D Nguyet; L G Cohen; J P Brasil-Neto; A Cammarota; M Hallett
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 2.714

4.  Variability of motor potentials evoked by transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  L Kiers; D Cros; K H Chiappa; J Fang
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1993-12

Review 5.  The uses and interpretations of the motor-evoked potential for understanding behaviour.

Authors:  Sven Bestmann; John W Krakauer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Cortical inhibition and excitation by bilateral transcranial alternating current stimulation.

Authors:  Andrea Cancelli; Carlo Cottone; Giancarlo Zito; Marina Di Giorgio; Patrizio Pasqualetti; Franca Tecchio
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 2.406

7.  A low cost real-time motion tracking approach using webcam technology.

Authors:  Chandramouli Krishnan; Edward P Washabaugh; Yogesh Seetharaman
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2014-12-10       Impact factor: 2.712

Review 8.  Physiology of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human brain.

Authors:  Janna Marie Hoogendam; Geert M J Ramakers; Vincenzo Di Lazzaro
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2009-11-24       Impact factor: 8.955

9.  Inhibitory repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation of the contralesional premotor and primary motor cortices facilitate poststroke motor recovery.

Authors:  Chien-Chih Wang; Chih-Pin Wang; Po-Yi Tsai; Chin-Yi Hsieh; Rai-Chi Chan; Shih-Ching Yeh
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2014       Impact factor: 2.406

10.  Trial-to-trial variability of corticospinal volleys in human subjects.

Authors:  D Burke; R Hicks; J Stephen; I Woodforth; M Crawford
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1995-10
View more
  3 in total

1.  A novel low-cost approach for navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation.

Authors:  Jakob Rodseth; Edward P Washabaugh; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  Restor Neurol Neurosci       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 2.406

2.  Evaluation of motor cortical excitability using evoked torque responses: A new tool with high reliability.

Authors:  Aastha K Dharia; Adam Gardi; Amanda K Vogel; Aviroop Dutt-Mazumder; Chandramouli Krishnan
Journal:  J Neurosci Methods       Date:  2020-11-12       Impact factor: 2.390

Review 3.  Stimulation Parameters Used During Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation for Motor Recovery and Corticospinal Excitability Modulation in SCI: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Nabila Brihmat; Didier Allexandre; Soha Saleh; Jian Zhong; Guang H Yue; Gail F Forrest
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2022-04-07       Impact factor: 3.473

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.