Literature DB >> 7488595

EyeSys corneal topography measurement applied to calibrated ellipsoidal convex surfaces.

W A Douthwaite1.   

Abstract

AIMS/
BACKGROUND: This study was carried out to assess the accuracy of the EyeSys videokeratoscope by using convex ellipsoidal surfaces of known form.
METHODS: PMMA convex ellipsoidal buttons were calibrated using Form Talysurf analysis which allowed subsequent calculation of the vertex radius and p value of the surface. The EyeSys videokeratoscope was used to examine the same ellipsoids. The tabular data provided by the instrument software were used to plot a graph of r2 versus y2 where r is the measured radius at y, the distance from the corneal point being measured to the surface vertex. The intercept on the ordinate of this graph gives the vertex radius and the slope the p value. The results arising from the Talysurf and the EyeSys techniques were compared.
RESULTS: The EyeSys videokeratoscope gave readings for both vertex radius and p value that were higher than those of the Talysurf analysis. The vertex radius was around 0.1 mm greater. The p value results were similar by the two methods for p values around unity but the EyeSys results were higher and the discrepancy increased as the p value approached that of a paraboloid.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the videokeratoscope may be useful in comparative studies of the cornea, there must be some doubt about the absolute values displayed. The disagreement is sufficiently large to suggest that the instrument may not be accurate enough for contact lens fitting purposes.

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7488595      PMCID: PMC505262          DOI: 10.1136/bjo.79.9.797

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0007-1161            Impact factor:   4.638


  8 in total

1.  Practical aspects of a corneal topography system.

Authors:  B E McCarey; C A Zurawski; D S O'Shea
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1992-10

2.  Accuracy and precision of the corneal analysis system and the topographic modeling system.

Authors:  S E Wilson; S M Verity; D L Conger
Journal:  Cornea       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 2.651

3.  What radius does the conventional keratometer measure?

Authors:  A G Bennett; R B Rabbetts
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1991-07       Impact factor: 3.117

4.  Improved method for calculation of corneal topography for any photokeratoscope geometry.

Authors:  P P van Saarloos; I J Constable
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.973

5.  A new reconstruction algorithm for improvement of corneal topographical analysis.

Authors:  J Y Wang; D A Rice; S D Klyce
Journal:  Refract Corneal Surg       Date:  1989 Nov-Dec

6.  Corneal topography: a clinical model.

Authors:  M Guillon; D P Lydon; C Wilson
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  1986       Impact factor: 3.117

7.  Evaluating the reproducibility of topography systems on spherical surfaces.

Authors:  L J Maguire; S E Wilson; J J Camp; S Verity
Journal:  Arch Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-02

8.  A comparison of the TMS-1 and the corneal analysis system for the evaluation of abnormal corneas.

Authors:  J J Antalis; R G Lembach; L G Carney
Journal:  CLAO J       Date:  1993-01
  8 in total
  3 in total

1.  Corneal topography by keratometry.

Authors:  W A Douthwaite; W T Evardson
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  Extent and effect of surface tilt on the data display of the EyeSys videokeratoscope.

Authors:  W A Douthwaite; S Pardhan; H Burek
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Validity of autorefractor based screening method for irregular astigmatism compared to the corneal topography- a cross sectional study.

Authors:  Alicia Galindo-Ferreiro; Julita De Miguel-Gutierrez; Manuel González-Sagrado; Alberto Galvez-Ruiz; Rajiv Khandekar; Silvana Schellini; Julio Galindo-Alonso
Journal:  Int J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-09-18       Impact factor: 1.779

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.