Literature DB >> 7487418

Transfusion medicine monitoring practices. A study of the College of American Pathologists/Centers for Disease Control and Prevention Outcomes Working Group.

D J Boone1, S D Steindel, R Herron, P J Howanitz, P Bachner, F Meier, R B Schifman, R B Zarbo.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To survey transfusion medicine practices in 1990, to determine the distribution of defects in the transfusion process, to examine the relationship between defects and complications, and to recommend improvements in the transfusion process.
DESIGN: A mail survey that divided the transfusion process into 24 risk-prone steps and gathered defect rates on each step, along with incidence data for eight known complications of transfusions and other demographic information. SETTINGS: Hospitals, independent laboratories, and blood centers that provide transfusion medicine services. OTHER PARTICIPANTS: Respondents were 1365 participants in the College of American Pathologists 1991 Blood Bank Quality Assurance Survey.
RESULTS: While processing 6.2 million units of blood and blood products, respondents reported detecting over 88,000 defects: 41% in the preanalytic phase of testing, 55% in the postanalytic phase, and only 4% in the analytic phase, the phase to which most monitoring efforts were devoted. A median of eight steps were actively monitored by survey participants overall, whereas 96 facilities sought defects in all 24 steps.
CONCLUSIONS: Analysis of the data showed several monitoring steps provide similar information. Although monitoring of the transfusion process could not be linked with prevention of the complications studied, active surveillance does focus attention on defect-prone steps and allows testing of strategies to improve the transfusion process. We describe how defect detection systems may be improved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7487418

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med        ISSN: 0003-9985            Impact factor:   5.534


  9 in total

1.  Error management in blood establishments: results of eight years of experience (2003-2010) at the Croatian Institute of Transfusion Medicine.

Authors:  Tomislav Vuk; Marijan Barišić; Tihomir Očić; Ivanka Mihaljević; Dorotea Sarlija; Irena Jukić
Journal:  Blood Transfus       Date:  2012-02-22       Impact factor: 3.443

2.  Laboratory turnaround time.

Authors:  Robert C Hawkins
Journal:  Clin Biochem Rev       Date:  2007-11

3.  Influence of blood specimen collection method on various preanalytical sample quality indicators.

Authors:  Tester F Ashavaid; Sucheta P Dandekar; Bhamini Keny; Vishaal R Bhambhwani
Journal:  Indian J Clin Biochem       Date:  2008-06-11

4.  Audit of clinical-laboratory practices in haematology and blood transfusion at Muhimbili National Hospital in Tanzania.

Authors:  Abel N Makubi; Collins Meda; Alex Magesa; Peter Minja; Juliana Mlalasi; Zubeda Salum; Rumisha E Kweka; James Rwehabura; Amrana Quaresh; Pius M Magesa; David Robert; Julie Makani; Ephata Kaaya
Journal:  Tanzan J Health Res       Date:  2012-10

5.  National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for use of tumor markers in clinical practice: quality requirements.

Authors:  Catharine M Sturgeon; Barry R Hoffman; Daniel W Chan; Soo-Ling Ch'ng; Elizabeth Hammond; Daniel F Hayes; Lance A Liotta; Emmanuel F Petricoin; Manfred Schmitt; O John Semmes; Györg Söletormos; Elena van der Merwe; Eleftherios P Diamandis
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2008-07-07       Impact factor: 8.327

6.  Types and frequency of preanalytical mistakes in the first Thai ISO 9002:1994 certified clinical laboratory, a 6 - month monitoring.

Authors:  Viroj Wiwanitkit
Journal:  BMC Clin Pathol       Date:  2001

Review 7.  Guidelines for the standardization of preanalytic variables for blood-based biomarker studies in Alzheimer's disease research.

Authors:  Sid E O'Bryant; Veer Gupta; Kim Henriksen; Melissa Edwards; Andreas Jeromin; Simone Lista; Chantal Bazenet; Holly Soares; Simon Lovestone; Harald Hampel; Thomas Montine; Kaj Blennow; Tatiana Foroud; Maria Carrillo; Neill Graff-Radford; Christoph Laske; Monique Breteler; Leslie Shaw; John Q Trojanowski; Nicole Schupf; Robert A Rissman; Anne M Fagan; Pankaj Oberoi; Robert Umek; Michael W Weiner; Paula Grammas; Holly Posner; Ralph Martins
Journal:  Alzheimers Dement       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 21.566

8.  Monitoring of anticoagulant therapy in heart disease: considerations for the current assays.

Authors:  Mohammadali Boroumand; Hamidreza Goodarzynejad
Journal:  J Tehran Heart Cent       Date:  2010-05-31

Review 9.  The value of home-based collection of biospecimens in reproductive epidemiology.

Authors:  John C Rockett; Germaine M Buck; Courtney D Lynch; Sally D Perreault
Journal:  Environ Health Perspect       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 9.031

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.