Literature DB >> 7486895

Comparison of sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

A Cagni1, C Chuard, P E Vaudaux, J Schrenzel, D P Lew.   

Abstract

The prophylactic and therapeutic activities of three broad-spectrum fluoroquinolones were evaluated in two different experimental models of foreign-body infections caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) susceptible to quinolones. In a guinea pig model of prophylaxis, subcutaneously implanted tissue cages were infected at a > 90% rate by 10(2) CFU of MRSA in control animals. A single dose of 50 mg of ciprofloxacin per kg of body weight administered intraperitoneally 3 h before bacterial challenge was less effective than an equivalent regimen of either sparfloxacin or temafloxacin in decreasing the rate of experimental infection in tissue cages challenged with increasing inocula of MRSA. In a rat model evaluating the therapy of chronic tissue cage infection caused by MRSA, the efficacy of a 7-day high-dose (50-mg/kg twice-daily) regimen of sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, or ciprofloxacin was compared to that of vancomycin (50 mg/kg twice daily). Active levels of sparfloxacin, temfloxacin, or ciprofloxacin were continuously present in tissue cage fluid during therapy, exceeding their MBCs for MRSA by 6- to 20-fold. Either temafloxacin, sparfloxacin, or vancomycin was significantly (P < 0.01) more active than ciprofloxacin in decreasing the viable counts of MRSA in tissue cage fluids. The different activities of ciprofloxacin compared with those of the other two quinolones against chronic tissue cage infections caused by MRSA did not involve the selective emergence of quinolone-resistant mutants. Temafloxacin and ciprofloxacin, which showed the most prominent differences in their in vivo activities, however, exhibited similar bactericidal properties and pharmacokinetic parameters in the rat model. In conclusion, both temafloxacin and sparfloxacin were significantly more active than ciprofloxacin for the prophylaxis or treatment of experimental foreign-body infections caused by a quinolone-susceptible strain of MRSA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486895      PMCID: PMC162802          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.39.8.1655

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  31 in total

Review 1.  Role of pharmacokinetics in the outcome of infections.

Authors:  G L Drusano
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Oral temafloxacin versus vancomycin for therapy of experimental endocarditis caused by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  M T Hessen; P G Pitsakis; D Kaye
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Comparative efficacies of ciprofloxacin, pefloxacin, and vancomycin in combination with rifampin in a rat model of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus chronic osteomyelitis.

Authors:  R Dworkin; G Modin; S Kunz; R Rich; O Zak; M Sande
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1990-06       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Emergence of ciprofloxacin resistance in nosocomial methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Resistance during ciprofloxacin plus rifampin therapy for methicillin-resistant S aureus colonization.

Authors:  L R Peterson; J N Quick; B Jensen; S Homann; S Johnson; J Tenquist; C Shanholtzer; R A Petzel; L Sinn; D N Gerding
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1990-10

5.  Correlation between in vivo and in vitro efficacy of antimicrobial agents against foreign body infections.

Authors:  A F Widmer; R Frei; Z Rajacic; W Zimmerli
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 5.226

6.  Pathogenesis of foreign body infection: description and characteristics of an animal model.

Authors:  W Zimmerli; F A Waldvogel; P Vaudaux; U E Nydegger
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 5.226

7.  Treatment of experimental chronic osteomyelitis due to staphylococcus aureus with vancomycin and rifampin.

Authors:  C W Norden; M Shaffer
Journal:  J Infect Dis       Date:  1983-02       Impact factor: 5.226

8.  Rifampin resistance. Development during the therapy of methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus infection.

Authors:  R H Eng; S M Smith; M Tillem; C Cherubin
Journal:  Arch Intern Med       Date:  1985-01

9.  Differences in ability of cell-wall antibiotics to suppress emergence of rifampicin resistance in Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  R H Eng; S M Smith; F J Buccini; C E Cherubin
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 5.790

10.  Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H J Schaad; C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  8 in total

Review 1.  Infections associated with medical devices: pathogenesis, management and prophylaxis.

Authors:  Christof von Eiff; Bernd Jansen; Wolfgang Kohnen; Karsten Becker
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Intensive therapy with ceftobiprole medocaril of experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Asllan Gjinovci; Manuela Bento; Dongmei Li; Jacques Schrenzel; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Efficacy of high doses of levofloxacin in experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  O Murillo; A Doménech; A Garcia; F Tubau; C Cabellos; F Gudiol; J Ariza
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2006-10-02       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Efficacy of a new fluoroquinolone, JNJ-Q2, in murine models of Staphylococcus aureus and Streptococcus pneumoniae skin, respiratory, and systemic infections.

Authors:  Jeffrey Fernandez; Jamese J Hilliard; Brian J Morrow; John L Melton; Robert K Flamm; Alfred M Barron; A Simon Lynch
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-09-12       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Comparison of levofloxacin, alatrofloxacin, and vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign-body-associated infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Patrice Francois; Carmelo Bisognano; Jacques Schrenzel; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2002-05       Impact factor: 5.191

6.  Comparison of tigecycline and vancomycin for treatment of experimental foreign-body infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Bénédicte Fleury; Asllan Gjinovci; Elzbieta Huggler; Manuela Tangomo-Bento; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 7.  The guinea pig as a model of infectious diseases.

Authors:  Danielle J Padilla-Carlin; David N McMurray; Anthony J Hickey
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 0.982

8.  Evaluation of high-dose daptomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus foreign body infection.

Authors:  Heinz J Schaad; Manuela Bento; Daniel P Lew; Pierre Vaudaux
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.090

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.