Literature DB >> 16127054

Intensive therapy with ceftobiprole medocaril of experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Pierre Vaudaux1, Asllan Gjinovci, Manuela Bento, Dongmei Li, Jacques Schrenzel, Daniel P Lew.   

Abstract

The therapeutic activity of ceftobiprole medocaril, the water-soluble prodrug of ceftobiprole, was compared to that of vancomycin in a rat tissue cage model of chronic methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) foreign-body infection. The MICs and MBCs of ceftobiprole and vancomycin in Mueller-Hinton broth for strain MRGR3 were 1 and 4 and 1 and 2 microg/ml, respectively. In vitro elimination rates of strain MRGR3 of 4 and 8 microg/ml of ceftobiprole or vancomycin were equivalent. After 2 weeks of infection, mean +/- standard error of the mean viable counts of strain MRGR3 were 6.83 +/- 0.11 log CFU/ml of tissue cage fluid (n = 87). High-dose regimens of ceftobiprole medocaril (equivalent to 150 mg/kg of ceftobiprole) or 50 mg/kg vancomycin produced nearly identical average peak and trough levels of ceftobiprole and vancomycin in tissue cage fluid, which exceeded the MBC of either antibiotic towards strain MRGR3 for > or =75% of each dosing interval. After 7 days of therapy with ceftobiprole medocaril or vancomycin, average counts of MRGR3 decreased significantly (P < 0.02) by 0.68 +/- 0.28 (n = 29) and 0.88 +/- 0.22 (n = 28) log CFU/ml of tissue cage fluid, respectively, compared with cages of untreated animals, but were not significantly different from each other. No resistant mutants were detected on ceftobiprole-supplemented agar following therapy with this cephalosporin. The in vivo activity of ceftobiprole medocaril against chronic MRSA foreign-body infections was equivalent to that of vancomycin and did not lead to the emergence of resistant subpopulations.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2005        PMID: 16127054      PMCID: PMC1195398          DOI: 10.1128/AAC.49.9.3789-3793.2005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother        ISSN: 0066-4804            Impact factor:   5.191


  45 in total

1.  Bactericidal activity of BAL9141, a novel parenteral cephalosporin against contemporary Gram-positive and Gram-negative isolates.

Authors:  Lalitagauri Deshpande; Paul R Rhomberg; Thomas R Fritsche; Helio S Sader; Ronald N Jones
Journal:  Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 2.803

2.  Phenotypic antibiotic tolerance of Staphylococcus aureus in implant-related infections: relationship with in vitro colonization of artificial surfaces.

Authors:  P Vaudaux
Journal:  Drug Resist Updat       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 18.500

3.  Survey of infections due to Staphylococcus species: frequency of occurrence and antimicrobial susceptibility of isolates collected in the United States, Canada, Latin America, Europe, and the Western Pacific region for the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 1997-1999.

Authors:  D J Diekema; M A Pfaller; F J Schmitz; J Smayevsky; J Bell; R N Jones; M Beach
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-05-15       Impact factor: 9.079

4.  In vitro and in vivo properties of Ro 63-9141, a novel broad-spectrum cephalosporin with activity against methicillin-resistant staphylococci.

Authors:  P Hebeisen; I Heinze-Krauss; P Angehrn; P Hohl; M G Page; R L Then
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 5.  Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: a new model of antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  K Hiramatsu
Journal:  Lancet Infect Dis       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 25.071

6.  Comparative efficacies of imipenem-cilastatin and vancomycin in experimental aortic valve endocarditis due to methicillin resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  P H Chandrasekar; D P Levine; S Price; M J Rybak
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  1988-04       Impact factor: 5.790

7.  Comparative efficacy of daptomycin and vancomycin in the therapy of experimental foreign body infection due to Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Patrice Francois; Carmelo Bisognano; Dongmei Li; Daniel P Lew; Jacques Schrenzel
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-05-29       Impact factor: 5.790

8.  Vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in the absence of vancomycin exposure.

Authors:  Cynthia J Whitener; Sarah Y Park; Fred A Browne; Leslie J Parent; Kathleen Julian; Bulent Bozdogan; Peter C Appelbaum; Jasmine Chaitram; Linda M Weigel; John Jernigan; Linda K McDougal; Fred C Tenover; Scott K Fridkin
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-24       Impact factor: 9.079

9.  Teicoplanin alone or combined with rifampin compared with vancomycin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  H J Schaad; C Chuard; P Vaudaux; F A Waldvogel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1994-08       Impact factor: 5.191

10.  Comparison of sparfloxacin, temafloxacin, and ciprofloxacin for prophylaxis and treatment of experimental foreign-body infection by methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  A Cagni; C Chuard; P E Vaudaux; J Schrenzel; D P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 5.191

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of ceftobiprole activity against a variety of gram-negative pathogens, including Escherichia coli, Haemophilus influenzae (β-lactamase positive and β-lactamase negative), and Klebsiella pneumoniae, in a rabbit meningitis model.

Authors:  A Stucki; M Cottagnoud; F Acosta; U Egerman; J Läuffer; P Cottagnoud
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-11-07       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  In vivo activity of ceftobiprole in murine skin infections due to Staphylococcus aureus and Pseudomonas aeruginosa.

Authors:  Jeffrey Fernandez; Jamese J Hilliard; Darren Abbanat; Wenyan Zhang; John L Melton; Colleen M Santoro; Robert K Flamm; Karen Bush
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-11-02       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Efficacies of ceftobiprole medocaril and comparators in a rabbit model of osteomyelitis due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Li-Yan Yin; Jason H Calhoun; Jacob K Thomas; Stuart Shapiro; Anne Schmitt-Hoffmann
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2008-03-10       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Comparison of tigecycline and vancomycin for treatment of experimental foreign-body infection due to methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Pierre Vaudaux; Bénédicte Fleury; Asllan Gjinovci; Elzbieta Huggler; Manuela Tangomo-Bento; Daniel P Lew
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-13       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Ceftobiprole medocaril is an effective treatment against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) mediastinitis in a rat model.

Authors:  Y Barnea; S Navon-Venezia; B Kuzmenko; N Artzi; Y Carmeli
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2013-09-14       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Emerging agents to combat complicated and resistant infections: focus on ceftobiprole.

Authors:  César Bustos; Jose L Del Pozo
Journal:  Infect Drug Resist       Date:  2010-04-22       Impact factor: 4.003

7.  Evaluation of high-dose daptomycin for therapy of experimental Staphylococcus aureus foreign body infection.

Authors:  Heinz J Schaad; Manuela Bento; Daniel P Lew; Pierre Vaudaux
Journal:  BMC Infect Dis       Date:  2006-04-11       Impact factor: 3.090

8.  Novel methicillin resistance gene mecD in clinical Macrococcus caseolyticus strains from bovine and canine sources.

Authors:  Sybille Schwendener; Kerstin Cotting; Vincent Perreten
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-08       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Transcriptomic and metabolic responses of Staphylococcus aureus exposed to supra-physiological temperatures.

Authors:  Bénédicte Fleury; William L Kelley; Daniel Lew; Friedrich Götz; Richard A Proctor; Pierre Vaudaux
Journal:  BMC Microbiol       Date:  2009-04-22       Impact factor: 3.605

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.