Literature DB >> 7486763

Acute appendicitis: does removal of a normal appendix matter, what is the value of diagnostic accuracy and is surgical delay important?

S J Walker1, C R West, M R Colmer.   

Abstract

A prospective study with long-term follow-up was undertaken of 248 patients (137 males, median age 18 years (range 6-81 years), undergoing emergency appendicectomy during a 12-month period. Acute inflammation was present in 182 patients (73.4%) (males 86.1%, females 57.8%; P < 0.001). Before surgery, the positive predictive value of diagnostic accuracy was 82.0% (males 91.2%, females 67.7%). Delaying surgery did not significantly increase the proportion of perforated appendices (22.0%), hospital stay, or frequency of postoperative complications (overall 49.6%). Hospital complications were significantly more common among patients with a perforated appendix. There was no significant difference in the complication rate between patients with or without appendicitis while in hospital, during the first 18 months after operation or 8 years after operation. At 18 months, 17 of 238 patients (7.1%) continued to experience their original pain. After 8 years the original pain was still present in 10 of 155 patients (6.5%). Continued pain was more likely in patients having undergone removal of a normal appendix (P < 0.001)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7486763      PMCID: PMC2502408     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  12 in total

1.  Should the 'normal' appendix be removed at operation for appendicitis?

Authors:  B Grunewald; J Keating
Journal:  J R Coll Surg Edinb       Date:  1993-06

2.  The perforated appendix.

Authors:  R A Malt
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1986-12-11       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  Which patients with suspected appendicitis should undergo laparoscopy?

Authors:  S Paterson-Brown; J N Thompson; J R Eckersley; G A Ponting; H A Dudley
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1988-05-14

4.  Is it necessary to perform appendicectomy in the middle of the night in children?

Authors:  R Surana; F Quinn; P Puri
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1993-05-01

5.  Indications for operation in suspected appendicitis and incidence of perforation.

Authors:  R Andersson; A Hugander; A Thulin; P O Nyström; G Olaison
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1994-01-08

6.  Appendicitis near its centenary.

Authors:  J Berry; R A Malt
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 12.969

7.  Appendicitis and mimicking conditions. A prospective study.

Authors:  O J Gilmore; J P Browett; P H Griffin; I K Ross; A J Brodribb; T J Cooke; M J Higgs; R C Williamson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1975-09-06       Impact factor: 79.321

8.  Scoring system for computer-aided diagnosis of acute appendicitis. The value of prospective versus retrospective studies.

Authors:  E Arnbjörnsson
Journal:  Ann Chir Gynaecol       Date:  1985

9.  The value of the barium enema in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A E Rajagopalan; J H Mason; M Kennedy; J Pawlikowski
Journal:  Arch Surg       Date:  1977-04

10.  Observation versus operation for abdominal pain in the right lower quadrant. Roles of the clinical examination and the leukocyte count.

Authors:  R J Nauta; C Magnant
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 2.565

View more
  11 in total

Review 1.  The incidence and risk factors of post-laparotomy adhesive small bowel obstruction.

Authors:  Galinos Barmparas; Bernardino C Branco; Beat Schnüriger; Lydia Lam; Kenji Inaba; Demetrios Demetriades
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  The significance of occult carcinoids in the era of laparoscopic appendectomies.

Authors:  Ron Shapiro; Shai Eldar; Eran Sadot; Moris Venturero; Moshe Z Papa; Douglas B Zippel
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 3.  The natural history and traditional management of appendicitis revisited: spontaneous resolution and predominance of prehospital perforations imply that a correct diagnosis is more important than an early diagnosis.

Authors:  Roland E Andersson
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  [Laparoscopy for suspected appendicitis. Should an appendix that appears normal be removed?].

Authors:  B Garlipp; G Arlt
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 0.955

5.  Appendectomies in rural hospitals. Safe whether performed by specialist or GP surgeons.

Authors:  S Iglesias; L D Saunders; N Tracy; N Thangisalam; L Jones
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.275

6.  Introducing diagnostic laparoscopy for patients with suspected acute appendicitis.

Authors:  A C Moberg; A Montgomery
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2000-10       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Laparoscopy reduces unnecessary appendicectomies and improves diagnosis in fertile women. A randomized study.

Authors:  P G Larsson; G Henriksson; M Olsson; J Boris; P Ströberg; S E Tronstad; S Skullman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2001-02       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  Better visualization of vermiform appendix with tissue harmonic imaging compared to conventional sonography.

Authors:  Mikail Inal; Birsen Unal; Yasemin Karadeniz Bilgili
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2014-09-23       Impact factor: 0.212

9.  Acute appendicitis: is removal of a normal appendix still existing and can we reduce its rate?

Authors:  Gamal Khairy
Journal:  Saudi J Gastroenterol       Date:  2009 Jul-Sep       Impact factor: 2.485

10.  Pain over speed bumps in diagnosis of acute appendicitis: diagnostic accuracy study.

Authors:  Helen F Ashdown; Nigel D'Souza; Diallah Karim; Richard J Stevens; Andrew Huang; Anthony Harnden
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.