Literature DB >> 7485360

Random dot motion perimetry in patients with glaucoma and in normal subjects.

M Wall1, K M Ketoff.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine whether patients with primary open-angle glaucoma have an increase in size thresholds, prolongation of reaction times, and greater localization errors to random dot motion stimuli than normal subjects.
METHODS: Motion perimetry, a computer graphics method of visual field testing, quantitates a subject's ability to detect a correlated shift in position of dots within a defined circular area against a background of fixed dots. We measured motion thresholds, the smallest detectable circular dot motion target, at the Humphrey 24-2 test loci. By using the subject's light-pen responses to the location of the targets, we computed motion size threshold, reaction times, and localization errors (number of pixels from where the subject touched the monitor to the target center). With motion perimetry and conventional automated perimetry, we tested one eye in each of 25 patients with primary open-angle glaucoma and 25 age-matched control subjects. We then generated total deviation pointwise probability plots for the patients with primary open-angle glaucoma.
RESULTS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had increased mean motion size threshold (P < .001) and increased localization errors (P < .002), compared with the control subjects. With the probability plot analysis, there was good correlation of the visual field defects between the two perimetry tests. Additionally, motion perimetry identified nerve fiber bundle-like defects in 12 patients that were not detected with conventional automated perimetry.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with primary open-angle glaucoma had abnormal motion perception with an increase in spatial localization error.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7485360     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9394(14)72205-6

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0002-9394            Impact factor:   5.258


  4 in total

1.  Is multifocal electroretinography an early predictor of glaucoma?

Authors:  Haydar Gölemez; Nilgün Yıldırım; Ahmet Özer
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-01-20       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  A novel Bayesian adaptive method for mapping the visual field.

Authors:  Pengjing Xu; Luis Andres Lesmes; Deyue Yu; Zhong-Lin Lu
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.240

3.  Rapid Campimetry-A Novel Screening Method for Glaucoma Diagnosis.

Authors:  Fabian Müller; Khaldoon O Al-Nosairy; Francie H Kramer; Christian Meltendorf; Nidele Djouoma; Hagen Thieme; Michael B Hoffmann; Friedrich Hoffmann
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-04-12       Impact factor: 4.964

4.  The Effect of Simulated Visual Field Loss on Optokinetic Nystagmus.

Authors:  Soheil M Doustkouhi; Philip R K Turnbull; Steven C Dakin
Journal:  Transl Vis Sci Technol       Date:  2020-02-21       Impact factor: 3.283

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.