Literature DB >> 26792427

Is multifocal electroretinography an early predictor of glaucoma?

Haydar Gölemez1, Nilgün Yıldırım2, Ahmet Özer2.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the potential use of mfERG as an objective functional test that can express inner and outer retinal changes during the early stages of glaucoma.
METHODS: One hundred and twenty-six eyes of 126 patients were included. There were 30 healthy (Group 1), 28 glaucoma suspect (Group 2), 48 early glaucoma (Group 3), and 20 advanced glaucoma cases (Group 4). After complete ophthalmic examination, Humphrey visual field analysis and mfERG were performed. These examinations were performed three times at 6-month intervals, and only the last examination results were used for the analysis. Visual fields global indices and mfERG implicit time and amplitudes were evaluated and analyzed by ring system (central 5°, 5°-10°, 10°-15° and >15°). One-way ANOVA and ROC curve analysis were used for statistical analysis.
RESULTS: There was no statistically (one-way ANOVA) significant differences in patient age between groups (p = 0.126). For all rings, we detected statistically significant differences for the mean implicit time (latency) of the N1, P1, and N2 components between the advanced glaucoma and control subjects and between the advanced glaucoma and glaucoma suspects. The N2 amplitudes were significantly decreased in all rings in the advanced glaucoma patients when compared with control subjects. The N2 amplitude was significantly different between healthy subjects (Group 1) and early glaucoma subjects (Group 3) in the central 2° and 2°-5° rings. We used MedClac ROC curve analysis to identify the best parameters for discriminating between control subjects (Group 1) and early glaucoma patients (Group 3). The N2 implicit time for the central 2° ring (p < 0.0001), N2 amplitude for the central 2° ring (p = 0.0001), P1 implicit time for the 2°-5° ring (p = 0.0001), N2 implicit time for the 2°-5° ring (p = 0.0003), and N2 amplitude for the 2°-5° ring (p = 0.001) had ≥0.7 AUC values and were the best parameters in the ROC curve analyses that included the VFA parameters
CONCLUSION: Alterations of amplitudes and implicit times of N2 response in the central area may be able to detect glaucoma earlier than VFA. In addition, with progression to advanced glaucoma these changes can be significant in all retinal areas. Although implicit times of all mfERG components are significantly delayed in glaucoma, both delayed implicit time and decreased amplitude of N2 wave in the central area are effective predictors in early glaucoma diagnosis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Amplitude; Glaucoma; Humphrey perimetry; Implicit time; Latency; Multifocal electroretinography; N2 wave; Photopic negative response; Ring analysis

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 26792427     DOI: 10.1007/s10633-016-9524-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol        ISSN: 0012-4486            Impact factor:   2.379


  41 in total

1.  Receiver operating characteristic curves and their use in radiology.

Authors:  Nancy A Obuchowski
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 11.105

2.  Pattern-evoked potentials and optic nerve fiber loss in monocular laser-induced glaucoma.

Authors:  M A Johnson; B A Drum; H A Quigley; R M Sanchez; G R Dunkelberger
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1989-05       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  ISCEV standard for clinical multifocal electroretinography (mfERG) (2011 edition).

Authors:  Donald C Hood; Michael Bach; Mitchell Brigell; David Keating; Mineo Kondo; Jonathan S Lyons; Michael F Marmor; Daphne L McCulloch; Anja M Palmowski-Wolfe
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2011-10-30       Impact factor: 2.379

4.  Pattern ERG in the monkey after section of the optic nerve.

Authors:  L Maffei; A Fiorentini; S Bisti; H Holländer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

Review 5.  Pattern electroretinography (PERG) and an integrated approach to visual pathway diagnosis.

Authors:  G E Holder
Journal:  Prog Retin Eye Res       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 21.198

6.  The photopic negative response of the macaque electroretinogram: reduction by experimental glaucoma.

Authors:  S Viswanathan; L J Frishman; J G Robson; R S Harwerth; E L Smith
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1999-05       Impact factor: 4.799

7.  Nerve fiber layer defects with normal visual fields. Do normal optic disc and normal visual field indicate absence of glaucomatous abnormality?

Authors:  A Tuulonen; J Lehtola; P J Airaksinen
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1993-05       Impact factor: 12.079

8.  Short-wavelength color visual fields in glaucoma suspects at risk.

Authors:  P A Sample; J D Taylor; G A Martinez; M Lusky; R N Weinreb
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  1993-02-15       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Flash and pattern electroretinograms in normal and laser-induced glaucomatous primate eyes.

Authors:  M S Marx; S M Podos; I Bodis-Wollner; J R Howard-Williams; M J Siegel; C S Teitelbaum; E L Maclin; C Severin
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 4.799

10.  An evaluation of optic disc and nerve fiber layer examinations in monitoring progression of early glaucoma damage.

Authors:  H A Quigley; J Katz; R J Derick; D Gilbert; A Sommer
Journal:  Ophthalmology       Date:  1992-01       Impact factor: 12.079

View more
  5 in total

1.  Test-retest reliability of the multifocal photopic negative response.

Authors:  Anthony W Van Alstine; Suresh Viswanathan
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-12-29       Impact factor: 2.379

2.  Comparing three different modes of electroretinography in experimental glaucoma: diagnostic performance and correlation to structure.

Authors:  Laura Wilsey; Sowjanya Gowrisankaran; Grant Cull; Christy Hardin; Claude F Burgoyne; Brad Fortune
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-02-27       Impact factor: 2.379

Review 3.  Visual function tests for glaucoma practice - What is relevant?

Authors:  Aparna Rao; Debananda Padhy; Anindita Pal; Avik Kumar Roy
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03       Impact factor: 2.969

4.  Temporal contrast adaptation in the analysis of visual function in primary open-angle glaucoma.

Authors:  Qianru Wu; Minyue Xie; Xuhao Chen; Di Zhang; Xiaoyong Chen; Ke Xu; Ying Hong; Chun Zhang
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2022-03-16       Impact factor: 3.535

Review 5.  Visual evoked potential in the early diagnosis of glaucoma. Literature review.

Authors:  Anne Marie Firan; Sînziana Istrate; Raluca Iancu; Ruxandra Tudosescu; Radu Ciuluvică; Liliana Voinea
Journal:  Rom J Ophthalmol       Date:  2020 Jan-Mar
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.