Literature DB >> 748330

Clinical prediction versus ultrasound measurement of IOL power.

C E Clevenger.   

Abstract

1. Clinical prediction was better than ultrasound prediction for the first 20 cases. It was approximately equal for the next 20 cases, but after this ultrasound was the more accurate. 2. There was no significant difference in ability of either clinical prediction of ultrasound to predict the power of various types of lenses, namely, 4-loop intracapsular lenses, 2-loop extracapsular lenses and Choyce-style anterior chamber lenses. 3. There was no clinically significant difference in accuracy of prediction regardless of the source (manufacturer) studied in this series. 4. Two major factors affecting results which ultrasound is totally helpless in predicting are surgically induced astigmatism and accuracy of stated lens power supplied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 748330     DOI: 10.1016/s0146-2776(78)80100-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Intraocul Implant Soc        ISSN: 0146-2776


  5 in total

1.  Pre- and postoperative refraction after cataract extraction with implantation of standard power IOL.

Authors:  T Olsen
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 4.638

2.  A comparison of postoperative refractive results with and without intraocular lens power calculation.

Authors:  S M Thompson; V Mohan-Roberts
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1986-01       Impact factor: 4.638

3.  Intraocular lens power calculation for planned ametropia: a clinical study.

Authors:  J S Hillman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1983-04       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Intraocular lens power calculation for emmetropia: a clinical study.

Authors:  J S Hillman
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  1982-01       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 5.  Myopic astigmatism a substitute for accommodation in pseudophakia.

Authors:  C Huber
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1981-12-16       Impact factor: 2.379

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.