Literature DB >> 7481167

Psychological reactions to information about risk of ischaemic heart disease in general practice.

B Christensen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To examine the psychological reactions in 40-49 year old men diagnosed as having an increased risk for the development of ischaemic heart disease at a health examination in general practice.
DESIGN: A multipractice study including a questionnaire about the psychological well-being before and 6 months after a health examination aimed at finding an increased risk for ischaemic heart disease.
SETTING: General practice in the county of Aarhus, Denmark. Sixty five general practitioners. PARTICIPANTS: 123 men with and 150 men without an increased risk of ischaemic heart disease. OUTCOME MEASURES: Psychological well-being was measured by the General Health Questionnaire (12 item version).
RESULTS: No significant change in GHQ-scores after the screening examination.
CONCLUSION: Information about increased risk of IHD in 40-49 year old men at a health examination in general practice did not change the psychological well-being as measured by a General Health Questionnaire 6 months after the examination.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7481167     DOI: 10.3109/02813439508996756

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Scand J Prim Health Care        ISSN: 0281-3432            Impact factor:   2.581


  6 in total

Review 1.  Effectiveness of general practice-based health checks: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Si Si; John R Moss; Thomas R Sullivan; Skye S Newton; Nigel P Stocks
Journal:  Br J Gen Pract       Date:  2014-01       Impact factor: 5.386

2.  Life style intervention in general practice: effects on psychological well-being and patient satisfaction.

Authors:  E Meland; E Laerum; J G Maeland
Journal:  Qual Life Res       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 4.147

Review 3.  Economic evaluation of cholesterol-related interventions in general practice. An appraisal of the evidence.

Authors:  T van der Weijden; J A Knottnerus; A J Ament; H E Stoffers; R P Grol
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 3.710

4.  Short-term mental distress in research participants after receiving cardiovascular risk information.

Authors:  Åsa Grauman; Mats G Hansson; Arvid Puranen; Stefan James; Jorien Veldwijk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-05-24       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 5.  Does the routine use of global coronary heart disease risk scores translate into clinical benefits or harms? A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  Stacey L Sheridan; Eric Crespo
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-03-20       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Impact of provision of cardiovascular disease risk estimates to healthcare professionals and patients: a systematic review.

Authors:  Juliet A Usher-Smith; Barbora Silarova; Ewoud Schuit; Karel G M Moons; Simon J Griffin
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 2.692

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.