Literature DB >> 25750465

Orthographic and semantic processing in young readers.

Lara R Polse1, Judy S Reilly2.   

Abstract

This investigation examined orthographic and semantic processing during reading acquisition. Children in first through fourth grade were presented with a target word and two response alternatives, and were asked to identify the semantic match. Words were presented in four conditions: an exact match and unrelated foil (STONE - STONE - EARS), an exact match and an orthographic neighbor foil (STONE - STONE - STOVE), a synonym match and an unrelated foil (STONE - ROCK - EARS), and a synonym match and an orthographic neighbor foil (STONE - ROCK - STOVE). Accuracy and reaction time results suggest that orthographic and semantic processing follow a two-step acquisition pattern. First, the orthographic component of reading develops quickly, however, forming strong conceptual links from orthographic to semantic representations follows a protracted trajectory, which matures between the third and fourth grade. These results are consistent with research that suggests younger children rely on more concrete, perceptual systems and then transition to more flexible, abstract cognition.

Entities:  

Year:  2015        PMID: 25750465      PMCID: PMC4349383          DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9817.2012.01544.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Res Read        ISSN: 0141-0423


  25 in total

1.  Developing normal reading skills: aspects of the visual processes underlying word recognition.

Authors:  V Aghababian; T A Nazir
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2000-06

2.  How does orthographic knowledge influence performance on phonological awareness tasks?

Authors:  Anne Castles; V M Holmes; Joanna Neath; Sachiko Kinoshita
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2003-04

3.  Cascaded versus noncascaded models of lexical and semantic processing: the turple effect.

Authors:  Kenneth I Forster; Jo Hector
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2002-10

4.  Computing the meanings of words in reading: cooperative division of labor between visual and phonological processes.

Authors:  Michael W Harm; Mark S Seidenberg
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 8.934

5.  The evolution of meaning: spatio-temporal dynamics of visual object recognition.

Authors:  Alex Clarke; Kirsten I Taylor; Lorraine K Tyler
Journal:  J Cogn Neurosci       Date:  2010-07-09       Impact factor: 3.225

6.  Semantic and phonological skills in predicting reading development: from 3-16 years of age.

Authors:  Jørgen Frost; Sigrid Madsbjerg; Jan Niedersøe; Ake Olofsson; Peer Møller Sørensen
Journal:  Dyslexia       Date:  2005-05

7.  Phonological processing and emergent literacy in younger and older preschool children.

Authors:  Jason L Anthony; Jeffrey M Williams; Renee McDonald; David J Francis
Journal:  Ann Dyslexia       Date:  2007-12-04

8.  Segmentation, not rhyming, predicts early progress in learning to read.

Authors:  V Muter; C Hulme; M Snowling; S Taylor
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  1998-10

9.  Can children and adults focus on sound as opposed to spelling in a phoneme counting task?

Authors:  R Treiman; M Cassar
Journal:  Dev Psychol       Date:  1997-09

10.  The English Lexicon Project.

Authors:  David A Balota; Melvin J Yap; Michael J Cortese; Keith A Hutchison; Brett Kessler; Bjorn Loftis; James H Neely; Douglas L Nelson; Greg B Simpson; Rebecca Treiman
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.