Literature DB >> 7475201

Catastrophic complications of the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis.

M D Iannettoni1, R I Whyte, M B Orringer.   

Abstract

Recent enthusiasm for the cervical esophagogastric anastomosis has arisen because of its perceived low morbidity. Although catastrophic complications of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis are unusual, they can and do occur, and prevention is possible if the potential for them is recognized. Among 856 patients undergoing a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis after transhiatal esophagectomy, catastrophic cervical infectious complications occurred in 11 patients (1.3%): vertebral body osteomyelitis (1), epidural abscess with neurologic impairment (2), pulmonary microabscesses from internal jugular vein abscess (1), tracheoesophagogastric anastomotic fistula (1), and major dehiscence necessitating anastomotic takedown (6). These complications became manifest from 5 to 85 days after the esophageal resection and reconstruction (mean 19 days). Leakage from a gastric suspension stitch placed in the anterior spinal ligament over the vertebral bodies resulted in a posterior gastric leak and either osteomyelitis or an epidural abscess in three patients, none of whom had evidence of extravasation on the routine barium swallow 10 days after operation. Cervical exploration for a presumed anastomotic leak led to the unexpected discovery of an abscess formed by the stomach and the adjacent wall of the internal jugular vein, which was ligated and resected. One patient without symptoms who was discharged from the hospital with a contained anastomotic leak on the postoperative barium swallow was readmitted 7 days later with a cervical tracheoesophagogastric anastomotic fistula of which he ultimately died. In 6 patients (7% of those who had anastomotic leaks) there was sufficient gastric ischemia or necrosis, or both, to necessitate takedown of the anastomosis and intrathoracic stomach, cervical esophagostomy, and insertion of a feeding tube. As a result of this experience, it is recommended that cervical gastric suspension sutures either be omitted entirely or placed in the fascia over the longus colli muscles anterior to the spine, but not directly into the prevertebral fascia overlying the vertebral bodies or cervical disks. All but minute cervical anastomotic leaks, even if apparently contained, are best drained rather than treated expectantly. Patients who remain febrile and ill after bedside drainage of a cervical esophagogastric anastomosis leak should undergo cervical reexploration in the operating room; major gastric ischemia or necrosis, or both, may warrant takedown of the anastomosis and intrathoracic stomach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7475201     DOI: 10.1016/S0022-5223(95)70072-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  22 in total

1.  Randomized trial comparing side-to-side stapled and hand-sewn esophagogastric anastomosis in neck.

Authors:  Sundeep Singh Saluja; Sukanta Ray; Sujoy Pal; Sumit Sanyal; Nikhil Agrawal; Nihar Ranjan Dash; Peush Sahni; Tushar Kanti Chattopadhyay
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-04-24       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Mid-term outcomes of side-to-side stapled anastomosis in cervical esophagogastrostomy.

Authors:  Won-Min Jo; Jae Seung Shin; In Sung Lee
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 2.153

3.  Transthoracic versus transhiatal esophagectomy for esophageal carcinoma: experience from a single tertiary care institution.

Authors:  Nadeem UlNazeer Kawoosa; Abdul Majeed Dar; Mukand Lal Sharma; Abdul Gani Ahangar; Ghulam Nabi Lone; Mohammad Akbar Bhat; Shyam Singh
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  Failed Gastric Pull up after Esophagectomy Managed by Colonic Interposition.

Authors:  Kapileshwer Vijay; Rajesh Godara; Varunika Vijayvergia
Journal:  Indian J Surg       Date:  2012-07-27       Impact factor: 0.656

Review 5.  Managing complications II: conduit failure and conduit airway fistulas.

Authors:  Shari L Meyerson; Christopher K Mehta
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2014-05       Impact factor: 2.895

Review 6.  Update on staging and surgical treatment options for esophageal cancer.

Authors:  Donald E Low
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Transhiatal esophagectomy: clinical experience and refinements.

Authors:  M B Orringer; B Marshall; M D Iannettoni
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  1999-09       Impact factor: 12.969

8.  Esophagospinal fistula with spondylodiscitis and meningitis after esophagectomy with gastric pull-up.

Authors:  Ingo Mecklenburg; Andreas Probst; Helmut Messmann
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2007-10-23       Impact factor: 3.452

9.  Cervical or thoracic anastomosis after esophageal resection and gastric tube reconstruction: a prospective randomized trial comparing sutured neck anastomosis with stapled intrathoracic anastomosis.

Authors:  Bruno Walther; Jan Johansson; Folke Johnsson; Christer Staël Von Holstein; Thomas Zilling
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 12.969

10.  Sternotomy after retrosternal esophagogastric anastomotic disruption: a case report.

Authors:  Hassan Jamal-Eddine; Murugan Sukumar; Nael Al-Sarraf
Journal:  Cases J       Date:  2009-05-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.