Literature DB >> 19896328

A computational model to predict changes in breathiness resulting from variations in aspiration noise level.

Rahul Shrivastav1, Arturo Camacho.   

Abstract

Perception of breathy voice quality is cued by a number of acoustic changes including an increase in aspiration noise level (AH) and spectral slope. Changes in AH in a vowel may be evaluated through measures such as the harmonic-to-noise ratio, cepstral peak prominence (CPP), or via auditory measures such as the partial loudness of harmonic energy and loudness of aspiration noise. Although a number of experiments have reported high correlation between such measures and ratings of perceived breathiness, a formal model to predict breathiness of a vowel has not been proposed. This research describes two computational models to predict changes in breathiness resulting from variations in AH. One model uses auditory measures, whereas the other uses CPP as independent variables to predict breathiness. For both cases, a translated and truncated power function is required to predict breathiness. Some parameters in both of these models were observed to be pitch dependent. The "unified" model based on auditory measures was observed to be more accurate than one based on CPP. Copyright (c) 2010 The Voice Foundation. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19896328      PMCID: PMC2891879          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvoice.2008.12.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Voice        ISSN: 0892-1997            Impact factor:   2.009


  16 in total

1.  Cepstral peak prominence: a more reliable measure of dysphonia.

Authors:  Yolanda D Heman-Ackah; Reinhardt J Heuer; Deirdre D Michael; Rosemary Ostrowski; Michelle Horman; Margaret M Baroody; James Hillenbrand; Robert T Sataloff
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.547

2.  The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 2.009

3.  Vocal quality factors: analysis, synthesis, and perception.

Authors:  D G Childers; C K Lee
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-11       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Analysis, synthesis, and perception of voice quality variations among female and male talkers.

Authors:  D H Klatt; L C Klatt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1990-02       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Significance of harmonic changes and noise components in hoarseness.

Authors:  N Yanagihara
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1967-09

6.  A new index for evaluation of the turbulent noise in pathological voice.

Authors:  T Fukazawa; A el-Assuooty; I Honjo
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-03       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Perception of aperiodicities in synthetically generated voices.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1988-06       Impact factor: 1.840

8.  Acoustic correlates of breathy vocal quality.

Authors:  J Hillenbrand; R A Cleveland; R L Erickson
Journal:  J Speech Hear Res       Date:  1994-08

9.  High-frequency power ratio of breathy voice.

Authors:  K Shoji; E Regenbogen; J D Yu; S M Blaugrund
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1992-03       Impact factor: 3.325

10.  Perceptual distances of breathy voice quality: a comparison of psychophysical methods.

Authors:  Sona Patel; Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2009-01-29       Impact factor: 2.009

View more
  7 in total

1.  Perceptual interaction of the harmonic source and noise in voice.

Authors:  Jody Kreiman; Bruce R Gerratt
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 1.840

2.  Pitch strength of normal and dysphonic voices.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; David A Eddins; Supraja Anand
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 1.840

3.  Pitch Strength as an Outcome Measure for Treatment of Dysphonia.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Cristina Jackson-Menaldi; Adam D Rubin; Jean Skeffington; Eric J Hunter; Mark D Skowronski; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-03-17       Impact factor: 2.009

4.  Modeling the voice source in terms of spectral slopes.

Authors:  Marc Garellek; Robin Samlan; Bruce R Gerratt; Jody Kreiman
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  A model for the prediction of breathiness in vowels.

Authors:  Rahul Shrivastav; Arturo Camacho; Sona Patel; David A Eddins
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.482

6.  The Perception of Breathiness in the Voices of Pediatric Speakers.

Authors:  Lisa M Kopf; Mark D Skowronski; Supraja Anand; David A Eddins; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2017-11-20       Impact factor: 2.009

7.  Modeling of Breathy Voice Quality Using Pitch-strength Estimates.

Authors:  David A Eddins; Supraja Anand; Arturo Camacho; Rahul Shrivastav
Journal:  J Voice       Date:  2016-01-07       Impact factor: 2.009

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.