Literature DB >> 7472542

Long-term prognosis and effect of endarterectomy in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis and contralateral carotid stenosis or occlusion: results from NASCET. North American Symptomatic Carotid Endarterectomy Trial (NASCET) Group.

A P Gasecki1, M Eliasziw, G G Ferguson, V Hachinski, H J Barnett.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to examine how the prognosis of patients who presented with a recent ischemic event referable to a 70% to 99% stenosis of one carotid artery (ipsilateral) was altered by stenosis and occlusion of the contralateral carotid artery. The benefit of performing carotid endarterectomy on the recently symptomatic artery, in the presence of contralateral artery disease, was also examined. A total of 659 patients were grouped into one of three categories according to the extent of stenosis in the contralateral carotid artery: less than 70% (559 patients), 70% to 99% (57 patients), and occlusion (43 patients). Strokes that occurred during the follow-up period were designated as ipsilateral if they arose from the same carotid artery as the symptom for which the patient had been entered into the study. Medically treated patients with an occluded contralateral artery were more than twice as likely to have had an ipsilateral stroke at 2 years than patients with either severe (hazard ratio: 2.36; 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.00-5.62) or mild-to-moderate (hazard ratio: 2.65; 95% CI: 1.43-4.90) contralateral artery stenosis. The perioperative risk of stroke and death was higher in patients with an occluded contralateral artery (4.0% risk) or mild-to-moderate (5.1% risk) contralateral stenosis. Regression analyses indicated that the results were not affected by other risk factors. An occluded contralateral carotid artery significantly increased the risk of stroke associated with a severely stenosed ipsilateral carotid artery. Despite higher perioperative morbidity in the presence of an occluded contralateral artery, the longer-term outlook for patients who had endarterectomy performed on the recently symptomatic, severely stenosed ipsilateral carotid artery was considerably better than for medically treated patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1995        PMID: 7472542     DOI: 10.3171/jns.1995.83.5.0778

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurosurg        ISSN: 0022-3085            Impact factor:   5.115


  45 in total

Review 1.  Symptomatic carotid artery stenosis.

Authors:  L J Kappelle
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Quality improvement guidelines for the performance of cervical carotid angioplasty and stent placement.

Authors:  John D Barr; John J Connors; David Sacks; Joan C Wojak; Gary J Becker; John F Cardella; Bohdan Chopko; Jacques E Dion; Allan J Fox; Randall T Higashida; Robert W Hurst; Curtis A Lewis; Terence A S Matalon; Gary M Nesbit; J Arliss Pollock; Eric J Russell; David J Seidenwurm; Robert C Wallace
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2003 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.825

3.  [Controversies in the treatment of carotid stenoses. Present state of research and evidence-based medicine].

Authors:  H-H Eckstein; P Heider; O Wolf; M Barone; M Hanke
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 0.955

Review 4.  [Treatment of arteriosclerotic carotid stenosis: an overview].

Authors:  T Struffert; I Grunwald; C Roth; W Reith
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  3D time-resolved MR angiography (MRA) of the carotid arteries with time-resolved imaging with stochastic trajectories: comparison with 3D contrast-enhanced Bolus-Chase MRA and 3D time-of-flight MRA.

Authors:  R P Lim; M Shapiro; E Y Wang; M Law; J S Babb; L E Rueff; J S Jacob; S Kim; R H Carson; T P Mulholland; G Laub; E M Hecht
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2008-09-03       Impact factor: 3.825

6.  Cerebral hemodynamic benefits after contralateral carotid artery stenting in patients with internal carotid artery occlusion.

Authors:  F Oka; H Ishihara; S Kato; M Higashi; M Suzuki
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 3.825

7.  Guidelines for the use of carotid endarterectomy: current recommendations from the Canadian Neurosurgical Society.

Authors:  J M Findlay; W S Tucker; G G Ferguson; R O Holness; M C Wallace; J H Wong
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1997-09-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Gender-specific risk of perioperative complications in carotid endarterectomy patients with contralateral carotid artery stenosis or occlusion.

Authors:  Jens Weise; Sascha Kuschke; Mathias Bähr
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.849

9.  Simultaneous bilateral carotid stenting in high-risk patients.

Authors:  S Liu; J H Jung; S-M Kim; H-K Lim; H-j Kwon; J K Kim; J S Kim; D C Suh
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2010-01-06       Impact factor: 3.825

10.  In-stent restenosis after interventional treatment of carotid artery stenoses: a long-term follow-up of a single center cohort.

Authors:  J Kammler; H Blessberger; T Lambert; J Kellermair; M Grund; A Nahler; M Lichtenauer; S Schwarz; C Reiter; C Steinwender; A Kypta
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2017-02-08       Impact factor: 5.460

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.