Literature DB >> 7469842

Visual evoked potentials with hemifield pattern stimulation. Their use in the diagnosis of retrochiasmatic lesions.

Y Kuroiwa, G G Celesia.   

Abstract

We measured several parameters of cortical potentials evoked by visual stimulation to produce a profile suggestive of retrochiasmatic lesions. Characteristic abnormal responses included (1) very low amplitude or absent transient visual evoked potentials (T-VEPs) after stimulation of the affected hemifield, (2) reversal of normal pattern amplitude of the T-VEP distribution after stimulation of the affected hemifield, (3) abnormal lateral occipital ratio, (4) absent or very low amplitude steady-state VEPs after stimulation of affected hemifield, and (5) abnormal midoccipital ratio.

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7469842     DOI: 10.1001/archneur.1981.00510020044005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Arch Neurol        ISSN: 0003-9942


  8 in total

1.  Auditory middle-latency responses in patients with localized and non-localized lesions of the central nervous system.

Authors:  Y Kaseda; S Tobimatsu; T Morioka; M Kato
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 4.849

2.  Pattern visual evoked potential in patients with posteriorly situated space-occupying lesions.

Authors:  G E Holder
Journal:  Doc Ophthalmol       Date:  1985-02       Impact factor: 2.379

3.  The hemispheric distribution of the transient rat VEP: a comparison of flash and pattern stimulation.

Authors:  M Onofrj; C Harnois; I Bodis-Wollner
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 1.972

4.  Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres.

Authors:  Voyko Kavcic; Regina L Triplett; Anasuya Das; Tim Martin; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 3.139

5.  Source model and scalp topography of pattern reversal visual evoked potentials to altitudinal stimuli suggest that infoldings of calcarine fissure are not part of VEP generators.

Authors:  M Onofrj; T Fulgente; A Thomas; G Malatesta; M Peresson; T Locatelli; V Martinelli; G Comi
Journal:  Brain Topogr       Date:  1995       Impact factor: 3.020

6.  Visual evoked potential diagnosis of field defects in patients with chiasmatic and retrochiasmatic lesions.

Authors:  M Onofrj; I Bodis-Wollner; L Mylin
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 10.154

7.  Visual dysfunction in treated schizophrenia suggested by visual evoked potentials from pattern-reversal stimulation.

Authors:  I Jibiki; Y Takizawa; N Yamaguchi
Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci       Date:  1991       Impact factor: 5.270

Review 8.  What can visual electrophysiology tell about possible visual-field defects in paediatric patients.

Authors:  Siân E Handley; Maja Šuštar; Manca Tekavčič Pompe
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2021-07-16       Impact factor: 3.775

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.