Literature DB >> 25575450

Role of inter-hemispheric transfer in generating visual evoked potentials in V1-damaged brain hemispheres.

Voyko Kavcic1, Regina L Triplett2, Anasuya Das3, Tim Martin4, Krystel R Huxlin5.   

Abstract

Partial cortical blindness is a visual deficit caused by unilateral damage to the primary visual cortex, a condition previously considered beyond hopes of rehabilitation. However, recent data demonstrate that patients may recover both simple and global motion discrimination following intensive training in their blind field. The present experiments characterized motion-induced neural activity of cortically blind (CB) subjects prior to the onset of visual rehabilitation. This was done to provide information about visual processing capabilities available to mediate training-induced visual improvements. Visual Evoked Potentials (VEPs) were recorded from two experimental groups consisting of 9 CB subjects and 9 age-matched, visually-intact controls. VEPs were collected following lateralized stimulus presentation to each of the 4 visual field quadrants. VEP waveforms were examined for both stimulus-onset (SO) and motion-onset (MO) related components in postero-lateral electrodes. While stimulus presentation to intact regions of the visual field elicited normal SO-P1, SO-N1, SO-P2 and MO-N2 amplitudes and latencies in contralateral brain regions of CB subjects, these components were not observed contralateral to stimulus presentation in blind quadrants of the visual field. In damaged brain hemispheres, SO-VEPs were only recorded following stimulus presentation to intact visual field quadrants, via inter-hemispheric transfer. MO-VEPs were only recorded from damaged left brain hemispheres, possibly reflecting a native left/right asymmetry in inter-hemispheric connections. The present findings suggest that damaged brain hemispheres contain areas capable of responding to visual stimulation. However, in the absence of training or rehabilitation, these areas only generate detectable VEPs in response to stimulation of the intact hemifield of vision.
Copyright © 2015 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Callosal connections; Cortical blindness; Hemianopia; Inter-hemispheric transfer time; Visual cortex

Mesh:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25575450      PMCID: PMC4326537          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.01.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuropsychologia        ISSN: 0028-3932            Impact factor:   3.139


  95 in total

1.  The mode of short-term memory encoding as indicated by event-related potentials in a memory scanning task with distractions.

Authors:  I Wolach; H Pratt
Journal:  Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.708

2.  Bypassing V1: a direct geniculate input to area MT.

Authors:  Lawrence C Sincich; Ken F Park; Melville J Wohlgemuth; Jonathan C Horton
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2004-09-19       Impact factor: 24.884

3.  Disappointing results from Nova Vision's visual restoration therapy.

Authors:  J C Horton
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 4.638

4.  Learning motion discrimination with suppressed and un-suppressed MT.

Authors:  Benjamin Thompson; Zili Liu
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2006-02-17       Impact factor: 1.886

5.  Organization of the callosal connections of visual areas V1 and V2 in the macaque monkey.

Authors:  H Kennedy; C Dehay; J Bullier
Journal:  J Comp Neurol       Date:  1986-05-15       Impact factor: 3.215

6.  Leter: Residual visual function after brain wounds involving the central visual pathways in man.

Authors:  E Poppel; R Held; D Frost
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1973-06-01       Impact factor: 49.962

7.  Perimetry, visual evoked potentials and visual evoked spectrum array in homonymous hemianopsia.

Authors:  G G Celesia; J T Meredith; K Pluff
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1983-07

8.  Discordance between subjective perimetric visual fields and objective multifocal visual evoked potential-determined visual fields in patients with hemianopsia.

Authors:  Ken Watanabe; Kei Shinoda; Itaru Kimura; Yukihiko Mashima; Yoshihisa Oguchi; Hisao Ohde
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2006-11-29       Impact factor: 5.258

9.  Conscious visual perception without V1.

Authors:  J L Barbur; J D Watson; R S Frackowiak; S Zeki
Journal:  Brain       Date:  1993-12       Impact factor: 13.501

10.  Optokinetic therapy improves text reading in patients with hemianopic alexia: a controlled trial.

Authors:  G A Spitzyna; R J S Wise; S A McDonald; G T Plant; D Kidd; H Crewes; A P Leff
Journal:  Neurology       Date:  2007-05-29       Impact factor: 9.910

View more
  8 in total

1.  Plasticity of transcallosal pathways after stroke and their role in recovery.

Authors:  Matteo Caleo
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Feature-based attention potentiates recovery of fine direction discrimination in cortically blind patients.

Authors:  Matthew R Cavanaugh; Antoine Barbot; Marisa Carrasco; Krystel R Huxlin
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-12-10       Impact factor: 3.139

Review 3.  Reorganization of Visual Callosal Connections Following Alterations of Retinal Input and Brain Damage.

Authors:  Laura Restani; Matteo Caleo
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2016-11-14

Review 4.  From Cortical Blindness to Conscious Visual Perception: Theories on Neuronal Networks and Visual Training Strategies.

Authors:  Vanessa Hadid; Franco Lepore
Journal:  Front Syst Neurosci       Date:  2017-08-29

5.  Lights from the Dark: Neural Responses from a Blind Visual Hemifield.

Authors:  Alice Bollini; Javier Sanchez-Lopez; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Front Neurosci       Date:  2017-05-23       Impact factor: 4.677

6.  Preattentive and Predictive Processing of Visual Motion.

Authors:  Constanze Schmitt; Steffen Klingenhoefer; Frank Bremmer
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Visually evoked responses from the blind field of hemianopic patients.

Authors:  Javier Sanchez-Lopez; Caterina A Pedersini; Francesco Di Russo; Nicolò Cardobi; Cristina Fonte; Valentina Varalta; Massimo Prior; Nicola Smania; Silvia Savazzi; Carlo A Marzi
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2017-10-05       Impact factor: 3.139

8.  Efficacy of Repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Combined With Visual Scanning Treatment on Cognitive-Behavioral Symptoms of Unilateral Spatial Neglect in Patients With Traumatic Brain Injury: Study Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Francesco Di Gregorio; Fabio La Porta; Giada Lullini; Emanuela Casanova; Valeria Petrone; Loredana Simoncini; Enrico Ferrucci; Roberto Piperno
Journal:  Front Neurol       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 4.003

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.