Literature DB >> 746141

Radiographic screening in the early detection of lung cancer.

F P Stitik, M S Tockman.   

Abstract

A prospective study designed to detect early lung cancer in a high risk outpatient volunteer population is in progress. At present all 10,362 volunteers have been recruited into the project. A review of the radiographs of patients with lung cancer identified on the initial screen, or in retrospect, has led to the following conclusions: (1) Independent double reading is important in a screening project. (2) There are no reliable radiographic criteria to distinguish early lung cancer from benign disease. (3) The lateral chest radiograph is useful in the high risk patient. From these conclusions the authors have three recommendations for the practicing radiologist. (1) Since double reading improves sensitivity, attempt to doubly read a chest radiograph by removing your eyes from the film and look at it a second time before finalizing your report. (2) Consider any newly appearing, noncalcified lesion in the chest radiograph of a high risk individual as primary lung cancer until proven otherwise. (3) Consider the "routine chest radiograph" in a high risk patient as a challenge to detect early lung cancer rather than the drudgery of day to day clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1978        PMID: 746141

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiol Clin North Am        ISSN: 0033-8389            Impact factor:   2.303


  19 in total

1.  Misinterpretation of the chest x ray as a factor in the delayed diagnosis of lung cancer.

Authors:  P M Turkington; N Kennan; M A Greenstone
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 2.401

2.  Comparison between chest digital tomosynthesis and CT as a screening method to detect artificial pulmonary nodules: a phantom study.

Authors:  T Gomi; M Nakajima; H Fujiwara; T Takeda; K Saito; T Umeda; K Sakaguchi
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-03-14       Impact factor: 3.039

Review 3.  Principles of cancer screening: lessons from history and study design issues.

Authors:  Jennifer M Croswell; David F Ransohoff; Barnett S Kramer
Journal:  Semin Oncol       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.929

4.  Spectrum of diagnostic errors in radiology.

Authors:  Antonio Pinto; Luca Brunese
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2010-10-28

5.  Computer-aided diagnosis for improved detection of lung nodules by use of posterior-anterior and lateral chest radiographs.

Authors:  Junji Shiraishi; Feng Li; Kunio Doi
Journal:  Acad Radiol       Date:  2007-01       Impact factor: 3.173

Review 6.  Computer-aided diagnosis in medical imaging: historical review, current status and future potential.

Authors:  Kunio Doi
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 4.790

Review 7.  Missed lung cancer: when, where, and why?

Authors:  Annemilia Del Ciello; Paola Franchi; Andrea Contegiacomo; Giuseppe Cicchetti; Lorenzo Bonomo; Anna Rita Larici
Journal:  Diagn Interv Radiol       Date:  2017 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 2.630

8.  A novel biomarker protein panel for lung cancer, a promising first step.

Authors:  Camilo Molina-Romero; Edgar Vergara; Oscar Arrieta
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2018-12

9.  Radiologic errors in patients with lung cancer.

Authors:  J V Forrest; P J Friedman
Journal:  West J Med       Date:  1981-06

10.  Chest tomosynthesis: technical principles and clinical update.

Authors:  James T Dobbins; H Page McAdams
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2009-07-18       Impact factor: 3.528

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.