OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the imaging capabilities of chest digital tomosynthesis (DT) as a screening method for the detection of artificial pulmonary nodules, and to compare its efficiency with that of CT. METHODS: DT and CT were used to detect artificial pulmonary nodules (5 mm and 8 mm in diameter, ground-glass opacities) placed in a chest phantom. Using a three-dimensional filtered back-projection algorithm at acquisition angles of 8°, 20°, 30° and 40°, DT images of the desired layer thicknesses were reconstructed from the image data acquired during a single tomographic scan. Both standard and sharp CT reconstruction kernels were used, and the detectability index (DI) valves computed for both the DT scan acquisition angles and CT reconstruction kernel types were considered. For the observer study, we examined 50 samples of artificial pulmonary nodules using both DT and CT imaging. On the basis of evaluations made by five thoracic radiologists, a jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) study was performed to compare and assess the differences in detection accuracy between CT and DT imaging. RESULTS: For each increased acquisition angle, DI obtained by DT imaging was similar to that obtained by CT imaging. The difference in the observer-averaged JAFROC figure of merit for the five readings was 0.0363 (95% confidence interval: -0.18, 0.26; F=0.101; p=0.75). CONCLUSION: With the advantages of a decreased radiation dose and the practical accessibility of examination, DT may be a useful alternative to CT for the detection of artificial pulmonary nodules.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this study was to evaluate the imaging capabilities of chest digital tomosynthesis (DT) as a screening method for the detection of artificial pulmonary nodules, and to compare its efficiency with that of CT. METHODS:DT and CT were used to detect artificial pulmonary nodules (5 mm and 8 mm in diameter, ground-glass opacities) placed in a chest phantom. Using a three-dimensional filtered back-projection algorithm at acquisition angles of 8°, 20°, 30° and 40°, DT images of the desired layer thicknesses were reconstructed from the image data acquired during a single tomographic scan. Both standard and sharp CT reconstruction kernels were used, and the detectability index (DI) valves computed for both the DT scan acquisition angles and CT reconstruction kernel types were considered. For the observer study, we examined 50 samples of artificial pulmonary nodules using both DT and CT imaging. On the basis of evaluations made by five thoracic radiologists, a jackknife free-response receiver operating characteristic (JAFROC) study was performed to compare and assess the differences in detection accuracy between CT and DT imaging. RESULTS: For each increased acquisition angle, DI obtained by DT imaging was similar to that obtained by CT imaging. The difference in the observer-averaged JAFROC figure of merit for the five readings was 0.0363 (95% confidence interval: -0.18, 0.26; F=0.101; p=0.75). CONCLUSION: With the advantages of a decreased radiation dose and the practical accessibility of examination, DT may be a useful alternative to CT for the detection of artificial pulmonary nodules.
Authors: A A Johnsson; J Vikgren; A Svalkvist; S Zachrisson; A Flinck; M Boijsen; S Kheddache; L G Månsson; M Båth Journal: Radiat Prot Dosimetry Date: 2010-02-24 Impact factor: 0.972
Authors: Elias Taylor Gunnell; Dora K Franceschi; Christina R Inscoe; Allison Hartman; Jennifer L Goralski; Agathe Ceppe; Brian Handly; Cassandra Sams; Lynn Ansley Fordham; Jianping Lu; Otto Zhou; Yueh Z Lee Journal: Eur Radiol Date: 2018-09-25 Impact factor: 5.315
Authors: Marian S Solbak; Mette K Henning; Andrew England; Anne C Martinsen; Trond M Aaløkken; Safora Johansen Journal: Eur Radiol Exp Date: 2020-09-11