Literature DB >> 7460251

Transthoracic resistance in human defibrillation. Influence of body weight, chest size, serial shocks, paddle size and paddle contact pressure.

R E Kerber, J Grayzel, R Hoyt, M Marcus, J Kennedy.   

Abstract

Successful defibrillation depends on delivery of adequate electrical current to the heart; one of the major determinants of current flow is transthoracic resistance (TTR). To study the factors influencing TTR, we prospectively collected data from 44 patients undergoing emergency defibrillation. Shocks of 94-450 J delivered energy were administered from specially calibrated Datascope defibrillators that displayed peak current flow, thereby permitting determination of TTR. Shocks were applied from standard (8.5-cm diameter) or large (13 cm) paddles placed anteriorly and laterally. First-shock TTR ranged from 15-143 omega. There was a weak correlation between TTR and body weight (r = 0.45, p less than 0.05) and a stronger correlation between TTR and chest width (r = 0.80, p less than 0.01). Twenty-three patients who were defibrillated using standard 8.5-cm paddles had a mean TTR of 67 +/- 36 omega (+/- SD), whereas 21 patients who received shocks using paddle pairs with at least one large (13 cm) paddle had a 21% lower TTR of 53 +/- 24 omega (p = 0.05, unpaired t test). Ten patients received first and second shocks at the same energy level; TTR declined only 8%, from 52 +/- 19 to 48 +/- 16 omega (p less than 0.01, paired t test). In closed chest dogs, shocks were administered using a spring apparatus that regulated paddle contact pressure against the thorax. Firmer contact pressure caused TTR to decrease 25%, from 48 +/- 22 to 36 +/- 17 omega (p less than 0.01, paired t test). Thus, human TTR varies widely and is related most closely to chest size. TTR declines only slightly with a second shock at the same energy level. More substantial reductions in TTR and declines only slightly with a second shock at the same energy level. More substantial reductions in TTR and increases in current flow can be achieved by using large paddles and applying firm paddle contact pressure.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7460251     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.63.3.676

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  23 in total

1.  Successful external cardioversion of atrial fibrillation in patients referred to an electrophysiologist for internal cardioversion.

Authors:  R J Verdino; J J Teuteberg; M C Burke; D E Kopp; C T Johnson; A C Lin; M Alberts; J G Kall; D J Wilber
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 2.882

2.  Part 10: Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 29.690

3.  Pediatric basic and advanced life support: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science with Treatment Recommendations.

Authors:  Monica E Kleinman; Allan R de Caen; Leon Chameides; Dianne L Atkins; Robert A Berg; Marc D Berg; Farhan Bhanji; Dominique Biarent; Robert Bingham; Ashraf H Coovadia; Mary Fran Hazinski; Robert W Hickey; Vinay M Nadkarni; Amelia G Reis; Antonio Rodriguez-Nunez; James Tibballs; Arno L Zaritsky; David Zideman
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2010-10-18       Impact factor: 7.124

4.  The outcome of direct current cardioversion (DCC) for the treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) in a district general hospital in Ireland.

Authors:  K P O'Rourke; C Cotter; D Mullane; P Thorpe; P Sullivan
Journal:  Ir J Med Sci       Date:  2006 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 1.568

5.  The effect of delivered energy on defibrillation shock impedance.

Authors:  D N Weiss; S R Shorofsky; R W Peters; M R Gold
Journal:  J Interv Card Electrophysiol       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 1.900

6.  Determinants of successful transthoracic defibrillation and outcome in ventricular fibrillation.

Authors:  G W Dalzell; A A Adgey
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1991-06

7.  Thoracic impedance of adult males during defibrillation--a curious discrepancy.

Authors:  J W Machin; J Brownhill; A Furness
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  1987-11       Impact factor: 2.602

8.  Rate of conversion and recurrence after sotalol treatment in patients with direct current-refractory atrial fibrillation.

Authors:  Anna Nergärdh; Rolf Nordlander; Mats Frick
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2006-02       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Association between transthoracic impedance and electrical cardioversion success with biphasic defibrillators: An analysis of 1055 shocks for atrial fibrillation and flutter.

Authors:  Mouhannad M Sadek; Varsha Chaugai; Mark J Cleland; Timothy J Zakutney; David H Birnie; F Daniel Ramirez
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2018-05-11       Impact factor: 2.882

10.  Relationship between canine transthoracic impedance and defibrillation threshold. Evidence for current-based defibrillation.

Authors:  B B Lerman; H R Halperin; J E Tsitlik; K Brin; C W Clark; O C Deale
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  1987-09       Impact factor: 14.808

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.