Literature DB >> 7452132

Independence of sensitivity to relative reinforcement rate and discriminability in signal detection.

D McCarthy, M Davison.   

Abstract

Six pigeons were trained to detect differences between two white stimuli, S1 and S2, differing in duration and arranged probabilistically on the center key of a three-key chamber. Detection performance was measured at two levels of discriminability. At one level, S1 was five seconds and S2 was thirty seconds. At the other level, S1 was twenty seconds and S2 was thirty seconds. The procedure was a standard signal-detection yes-no design in which stimulus-presentation probability was varied from .1 to .9 at both discriminability levels. On completion of the center-key stimulus, a peck on the center key darkened the center-key light and turned on the two red side keys. A left-key response was "correct" on S1 trials, and a right-key response was "correct" on S2 trials. Correct responses produced food reinforcement on a variable-ratio 1.3 schedule. Incorrect responses produced three second blackout. Discriminability was higher for the five-second versus thirty-second conditions than for the twenty-second versus thirty-second conditions, but there were no differences in sensitivity of behavior to reinforcement variation for the two stimulus pairs. Response bias was a function of the relative reinforcement rate for correct choice responses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7452132      PMCID: PMC1333006          DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1980.34-273

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav        ISSN: 0022-5002            Impact factor:   2.468


  15 in total

1.  Decision processes in perception.

Authors:  J SWETS; W P TANNER; T G BIRDSALL
Journal:  Psychol Rev       Date:  1961-09       Impact factor: 8.934

2.  The effects of different component response requirements in multiple and concurrent schedules.

Authors:  M Davison; A Ferguson
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  On two types of deviation from the matching law: bias and undermatching.

Authors:  W M Baum
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  The relation between the generalized matching law and signal-detection theory.

Authors:  M C Davison; R D Tustin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1978-03       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Duration discrimination: effects of probability of stimulus presentation.

Authors:  T F Elsmore
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-11       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Mathematical and electrical models of auditory detection.

Authors:  L A Jeffress
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1968-07       Impact factor: 1.840

7.  Detection of increments in noise intensity by monkeys.

Authors:  B M Clopton
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Some invariances of the isosensitivity function and their implications for the utility function of money.

Authors:  E Galanter; G L Holman
Journal:  J Exp Psychol       Date:  1967-03

9.  Signal detection in the rat.

Authors:  M H HACK
Journal:  Science       Date:  1963-02-22       Impact factor: 47.728

10.  Bias functions and operating characteristics of rats discriminating auditory stimuli.

Authors:  A L Hume; R J Irwin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1974-03       Impact factor: 2.468

View more
  32 in total

1.  Effects of response disparity on stimulus and reinforcer control in human detection tasks.

Authors:  S Gallagher; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 2.468

2.  Quantitative analyses of matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  B M Jones
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 2.468

3.  Rapid acquisition of bias in signal detection: dynamics of effective reinforcement allocation.

Authors:  Blake A Hutsell; Eric A Jacobs
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 2.468

4.  A theory of attending and reinforcement in conditional discriminations.

Authors:  John A Nevin; Michael Davison; Timothy A Shahan
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 2.468

5.  Signal-detection analyses of conditional discrimination and delayed matching-to-sample performance.

Authors:  Brent Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 2.468

6.  Types of responding in a signal-detection task.

Authors:  B Alsop; R Rowley
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 2.468

7.  Delayed reinforcement and delayed choice in symbolic matching to sample: Effects on stimulus discriminability.

Authors:  D McCarthy; M Davison
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1986-11       Impact factor: 2.468

8.  Discriminative performance of the domestic hen in a visual acuity task.

Authors:  L R Demello; T M Foster; W Temple
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 2.468

9.  Effects of differences between stimuli, responses, and reinforcer rates on conditional discrimination performance.

Authors:  J A Nevin; H Cate; B Alsop
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1993-01       Impact factor: 2.468

10.  Quantitative analysis.

Authors:  J A Nevin
Journal:  J Exp Anal Behav       Date:  1984-11       Impact factor: 2.468

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.