Literature DB >> 7448495

Assessment of progression of secondary bone lesions following cancer of the breast or prostate using serial radionuclide imaging.

B R Condon, R Buchanan, N W Garvie, D M Ackery, J Fleming, D Taylor, D Hawkes, B A Goddard.   

Abstract

A serial study on 32 patients with bone metastases following cancer of the breast or prostate was performed over three years. Up to ten sets of images (average of four) per patient were obtained during this period using 99Tcm methylene diphosphonate as the radiopharmaceutical. Ninety-three paired serial images of individual lesions were qualitatively assessed for change by three physicians in nuclear medicine and the results were compared with the quantitative results from computer analysis. The reproducibility of the quantitative approach was determined by the analysis of 20 paired lesions by three physicists. It was found that quantitative changes in uptake of less than 20% between images were generally not detected by the medical observers; a change of 41% had only a 95% probability of being identified as change by the physicians. Although much more reproducible in determining changes in individual lesions, the quantitative approach was found to be inferior to the qualitative assessment of overall change in the majority of cases which involve multiple lesions. The basic assumption that uptake varies proportionally with progression of the bone lesion is discussed an is considered in some instances to be untenable. The conclusion is drawn that the determination of progression from changes of uptake in longstanding lesions is uncertain and is subsidiary in importance to the detection of new lesions.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1981        PMID: 7448495     DOI: 10.1259/0007-1285-54-637-18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Radiol        ISSN: 0007-1285            Impact factor:   3.039


  11 in total

1.  A Norwegian nationwide quality assurance project in nuclear medicine: total performance in bone scintigraphy measured with a new transmission phantom.

Authors:  A Skretting; E Strandmyr; M W Lindegaard
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1990

Review 2.  Imaging of distant metastases of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Filippo Pesapane; Marcin Czarniecki; Matteo Basilio Suter; Baris Turkbey; Geert Villeirs
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Dual-energy CT-scan quantification of recalcification in osteolyses of the vertebral body due to mammary carcinomas in the course of antineoplastic treatment.

Authors:  W Crone-Münzebrock; U M Carl
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  1990 Mar-Apr       Impact factor: 5.150

4.  18F-fluoride PET: changes in uptake as a method to assess response in bone metastases from castrate-resistant prostate cancer patients treated with 223Ra-chloride (Alpharadin).

Authors:  Gary Cook; Chris Parker; Sue Chua; Bernadette Johnson; Anne-Kirsti Aksnes; Val J Lewington
Journal:  EJNMMI Res       Date:  2011-06-07       Impact factor: 3.138

5.  Comparison between visual assessment and quantitative measurement of radioactivity on the bone scintigram in Paget's disease of bone.

Authors:  C J Vellenga; E K Pauwels; O L Bijvoet
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1984

6.  A prospective study of bone tumor response assessment in metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  Naoki Hayashi; Colleen M Costelloe; Tsuyoshi Hamaoka; Caimiao Wei; Naoki Niikura; Richard L Theriault; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John E Madewell; Naoto T Ueno
Journal:  Clin Breast Cancer       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Radionuclide bone scintigraphy in patients with histiocytosis X.

Authors:  S J Westra; H van Woerden; A Postma; J D Elema; D A Piers
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med       Date:  1983

Review 8.  Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases.

Authors:  Tobias Bäuerle; Wolfhard Semmler
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2009-05-26       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Modern Detection of Prostate Cancer's Bone Metastasis: Is the Bone Scan Era Over?

Authors:  Bertrand Tombal; Frederic Lecouvet
Journal:  Adv Urol       Date:  2011-10-16

10.  Tumour response interpretation with new tumour response criteria vs the World Health Organisation criteria in patients with bone-only metastatic breast cancer.

Authors:  T Hamaoka; C M Costelloe; J E Madewell; P Liu; D A Berry; R Islam; R L Theriault; G N Hortobagyi; N T Ueno
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2010-01-26       Impact factor: 7.640

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.