Literature DB >> 19468736

Imaging response to systemic therapy for bone metastases.

Tobias Bäuerle1, Wolfhard Semmler.   

Abstract

In patients with osteotropic primary tumours such as breast and prostate cancer, imaging treatment response of bone metastases is essential for the clinical management. After treatment of skeletal metastases, morphological changes, in particular of bone structure, occur relatively late and are difficult to quantify using conventional X-rays, CT or MRI. Early treatment response in these lesions can be assessed from functional imaging techniques such as dynamic contrast-enhanced techniques by MRI or CT and by diffusion-weighted MRI, which are quantifiable. Among the techniques within nuclear medicine, PET offers the acquisition of quantifiable parameters for response evaluation. PET, therefore, especially in combination with CT and MRI using hybrid techniques, holds great promise for early and quantifiable assessment of treatment response in bone metastases. This review summarises the classification systems and the use of imaging techniques for evaluation of treatment response and suggests parameters for the early detection and quantification of response to systemic therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19468736     DOI: 10.1007/s00330-009-1443-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Radiol        ISSN: 0938-7994            Impact factor:   5.315


  99 in total

1.  New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors. European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer, National Cancer Institute of the United States, National Cancer Institute of Canada.

Authors:  P Therasse; S G Arbuck; E A Eisenhauer; J Wanders; R S Kaplan; L Rubinstein; J Verweij; M Van Glabbeke; A T van Oosterom; M C Christian; S G Gwyther
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2000-02-02       Impact factor: 13.506

Review 2.  Metastasis to bone: causes, consequences and therapeutic opportunities.

Authors:  Gregory R Mundy
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2002-08       Impact factor: 60.716

3.  Response evaluation of bone metastases in breast cancer: value of magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  P Saip; N Tenekeci; A Aydiner; M Dinçer; S Inanç; C Demir; E N Oral; E Topuz
Journal:  Cancer Invest       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 2.176

Review 4.  Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and its application to cancer.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Charles-Edwards; Nandita M deSouza
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2006-09-13       Impact factor: 3.909

5.  Whole-body low-dose multidetector row-CT in the diagnosis of multiple myeloma: an alternative to conventional radiography.

Authors:  Marius Horger; Claus D Claussen; Ulrike Bross-Bach; Reinhard Vonthein; Tobias Trabold; Martin Heuschmid; Christina Pfannenberg
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2005-05       Impact factor: 3.528

6.  Whole-body MRI versus whole-body MDCT for staging of multiple myeloma.

Authors:  Andrea Baur-Melnyk; Sonja Buhmann; Christoph Becker; Stefan Oswald Schoenberg; Nicola Lang; Reiner Bartl; Maximilian Ferdinand Reiser
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 3.959

7.  Bone tumors: magnetic resonance imaging versus computed tomography.

Authors:  W D Zimmer; T H Berquist; R A McLeod; F H Sim; D J Pritchard; T C Shives; L E Wold; G R May
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1985-06       Impact factor: 11.105

8.  A phase II clinical trial of sorafenib in androgen-independent prostate cancer.

Authors:  William L Dahut; Charity Scripture; Edwin Posadas; Lokesh Jain; James L Gulley; Philip M Arlen; John J Wright; Yunkai Yu; Liang Cao; Seth M Steinberg; Jeanny B Aragon-Ching; Jürgen Venitz; Elizabeth Jones; Clara C Chen; William D Figg
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2008-01-01       Impact factor: 12.531

9.  SU11248 inhibits tumor growth and CSF-1R-dependent osteolysis in an experimental breast cancer bone metastasis model.

Authors:  Lesley J Murray; Tinya J Abrams; Kelly R Long; Theresa J Ngai; Lisa M Olson; Weiru Hong; Paul K Keast; Jacqueline A Brassard; Anne Marie O'Farrell; Julie M Cherrington; Nancy K Pryer
Journal:  Clin Exp Metastasis       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 5.150

10.  Problems and limitations of bone scanning with the 99Tcm-phosphates.

Authors:  D L Citrin
Journal:  Clin Radiol       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 2.350

View more
  25 in total

Review 1.  Imaging of bone metastasis: An update.

Authors:  Gerard J O'Sullivan; Fiona L Carty; Carmel G Cronin
Journal:  World J Radiol       Date:  2015-08-28

2.  Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy.

Authors:  Frank I Lin; Jyotsna E Rao; Erik S Mittra; Kavitha Nallapareddy; Alka Chengapa; David W Dick; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 9.236

3.  Usefulness of dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging for predicting treatment response to vinorelbine-cisplatin with or without recombinant human endostatin in bone metastasis of non-small cell lung cancer.

Authors:  Rui Zhang; Zhi-Yu Wang; Yue-Hua Li; Yao-Hong Lu; Shuai Wang; Wen-Xi Yu; Hui Zhao
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2016-12-01       Impact factor: 6.166

Review 4.  Targeted therapies in renal cell cancer: recent developments in imaging.

Authors:  Astrid A M van der Veldt; Martijn R Meijerink; Alfons J M van den Eertwegh; Epie Boven
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2010-07-14       Impact factor: 4.493

Review 5.  MRI for response assessment in metastatic bone disease.

Authors:  F E Lecouvet; A Larbi; V Pasoglou; P Omoumi; B Tombal; N Michoux; J Malghem; R Lhommel; B C Vande Berg
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2013-03-01       Impact factor: 5.315

6.  Quantitative contrast-enhanced CT attenuation evaluation of osseous metastases following chemotherapy.

Authors:  Connie Y Chang; F Joseph Simeone; Martin Torriani; Miriam A Bredella
Journal:  Skeletal Radiol       Date:  2017-06-30       Impact factor: 2.199

7.  68Ga-PSMA-11 PET/CT-derived metabolic parameters for determination of whole-body tumor burden and treatment response in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Christian Schmidkonz; Michael Cordes; Daniela Schmidt; Tobias Bäuerle; Theresa Ida Goetz; Michael Beck; Olaf Prante; Alexander Cavallaro; Michael Uder; Bernd Wullich; Peter Goebell; Torsten Kuwert; Philipp Ritt
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 8.  The role of radionuclide probes for monitoring anti-tumor drugs efficacy: A brief review.

Authors:  Renata Salgado Fernandes; Carolina de Aguiar Ferreira; Daniel Cristian Ferreira Soares; Anna Margherita Maffione; Danyelle M Townsend; Domenico Rubello; André Luís Branco de Barros
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2017-09-12       Impact factor: 6.529

Review 9.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

10.  Reproducibility and clinical correlations of post-treatment changes on CT of prostate cancer bone metastases treated with chemotherapy.

Authors:  S Gourtsoyianni; S Hwang; D M Panicek; J Zheng; C Moskowitz; H Scher; M Morris; H Hricak
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-09       Impact factor: 3.039

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.