Literature DB >> 7440612

A five to seven-year follow-up of unicondylar arthroplasty.

J Insall, P Aglietti.   

Abstract

Thirty-two unicondylar knee replacements in thirty patients were done between 1972 and 1974. Ten patients were lost to follow-up because of death or other reasons. The remaining twenty-two knees (seventeen medial and five lateral compartments replaced) had a follow-up ranging from five to seven years, with an average of six years. Although the quality and result of these unicondylar arthroplasties were initially considered good, they have subsequently shown a marked deterioration. At the time of this report only one knee was rated as excellent; seven knees, as good; four knees, as fair; and ten knees, as poor. Seven knees (28 per cent) have been converted to a bicondylar prosthesis. The lateral replacements did much better than the medial replacements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7440612

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am        ISSN: 0021-9355            Impact factor:   5.284


  42 in total

1.  Unicompartmental knee replacements with Miller-Galante prosthesis: two to 16-year follow-up of a single surgeon series.

Authors:  Joby John; C Mauffrey; Peter May
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2010-04-25       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  High tibial osteotomy versus unicompartmental knee arthroplasty for medial compartment arthrosis of the knee: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Federico Dettoni; Davide Edoardo Bonasia; Filippo Castoldi; Matteo Bruzzone; Davide Blonna; Roberto Rossi
Journal:  Iowa Orthop J       Date:  2010

Review 3.  Minimally invasive knee arthroplasty: An overview.

Authors:  Alfred J Tria; Giles R Scuderi
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-11-18

4.  [AMC unicondylar prosthesis].

Authors:  G Saxler; D Temmen; G Bontemps
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 1.087

5.  Age predicts outcome of high-tibial osteotomy.

Authors:  K Trieb; J Grohs; B Hanslik-Schnabel; T Stulnig; J Panotopoulos; A Wanivenhaus
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 4.342

6.  [Minimally invasive implantation in unicondylar arthroplasty].

Authors:  R Hube; M Keim
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2007-12       Impact factor: 1.087

Review 7.  Lateral uni-compartmental knee replacement: current concepts and future directions.

Authors:  E Servien; A Merini; S Lustig; P Neyret
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2013-07-06       Impact factor: 4.342

8.  [The causes of failures in unicondylar knee arthroplasties].

Authors:  B Maudhuit
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  1995-12

9.  Long-term survivorship and failure modes of unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jared R H Foran; Nicholas M Brown; Craig J Della Valle; Richard A Berger; Jorge O Galante
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 4.176

10.  Long-term clinical results of the Oxford medial unicompartmental knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Numa Mercier; Simon Wimsey; Dominique Saragaglia
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2009-10-17       Impact factor: 3.075

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.