Literature DB >> 7438353

A new method for evaluating antiarrhythmic drug efficacy.

M Sami, H Kraemer, D C Harrison, N Houston, C Shimasaki, R F DeBusk.   

Abstract

To develop standards for distinguishing antiarrhythmic drug effect from spontaneous variability of premature ventricular complexes (PVCs), 21 males (mean age 56 +/- 8 years) with chronic ischemic heart disease and PVCs underwent symptom-limited treadmill exercise testing and 24-hour ambulatory monitoring before and after 2 weeks of placebo medication. Linear regression analysis was used to describe the relationship between baseline and placebo PVC frequency for various indexes of ventricular ectopic activity and to establish 95% and 99% one-tailed confidence intervals for this relationship within the group of 21 patients. The lower limit of baseline PVC frequency for which the procedure could distinguish a placebo from a true drug response, termed the "sensitivity threshold," was an average frequency of 2.2 PVCs/hour for ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring and 1.2 PVCs/min for treadmill exercise testing. All patients exceeded the sensitivity threshold on baseline ambulatory ECGs, but only 38% of patients did so on baseline treadmill exercise tests. To establish antiarrhythmic efficacy with 95% confidence, the minimal percent reduction of PVCs between baseline and placebo visits was 68% for treadmill exercise testing and 65% for ambulatory electrocardiography. Although these standards were developed in patients with chronic ischemic heart disease, the model can be used to establish antiarrhythmic drug efficacy in any patient group.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7438353     DOI: 10.1161/01.cir.62.6.1172

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Circulation        ISSN: 0009-7322            Impact factor:   29.690


  9 in total

Review 1.  Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use.

Authors:  R W Campbell
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1988-11       Impact factor: 9.546

2.  Antiarrhythmic therapy with flecainide in combination and comparison with propranolol.

Authors:  H Stern; M Scheininger; F Theisen; K Theisen
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1985       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Holter monitoring.

Authors:  E Guirguis
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 3.275

4.  Repeatability of ectopic beats from 48-hr ambulatory electrocardiography: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) Study.

Authors:  Michelle L Meyer; Elsayed Z Soliman; Lisa M Wruck; Thomas H Mosley; Lynne E Wagenknecht; Anna K Poon; Eric A Whitsel; Alvaro Alonso; Gerardo Heiss; Laura R Loehr
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2017-01-06       Impact factor: 1.468

5.  Age and sex as determinants of ventricular arrhythmic events in patients with decompensated congestive heart failure.

Authors:  Andrew J Burger; Doron Aronson
Journal:  Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 1.468

6.  The antiarrhythmic effects of controlled release disopyramide phosphate and long acting propranolol in patients with ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  P Fechter; H R Ha; F Follath; F Nager
Journal:  Eur J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 2.953

Review 7.  Ventricular arrhythmias.

Authors:  K M Kavanagh; D G Wyse
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  1988-05-15       Impact factor: 8.262

8.  Effect of a long acting beta-adrenoceptor blocker on diurnal variation of cardiac dysrhythmias.

Authors:  M A Mir
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1986-03       Impact factor: 2.401

9.  Comparison of the effectiveness of dihydroquinidine and quinidine on ventricular ectopy after acute and chronic administration.

Authors:  M Chimienti; M B Regazzi; M T La Rovere; J A Salerno; M Previtali; V Montericcio; R Rondanelli; C Montemartini
Journal:  Cardiovasc Drugs Ther       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 3.727

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.