Literature DB >> 3063500

Assessment of the risk-benefit ratio for antiarrhythmic drug use.

R W Campbell1.   

Abstract

Arrhythmia treatment has always been difficult, particularly as there are no good indicators of the optimal management strategy. The introduction of new antiarrhythmic agents has forced reappraisal of how these drugs are used. Dynamic electrocardiography and invasive electrophysiological studies are important tools for classifying and characterizing arrhythmias and for assessing the efficacy of therapy. There is still an enormous gulf between present day treatment and a scientific basis for drug selection, but risk-benefit analysis is possible, at least for patient populations and for some specific arrhythmias. Individual risk-benefit analysis, much needed by clinicians, is still a long way from reality. This article examines the concept of risk-benefit analysis and indicates those areas where progress can be made.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1988        PMID: 3063500     DOI: 10.2165/00003495-198836050-00005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Drugs        ISSN: 0012-6667            Impact factor:   9.546


  69 in total

1.  Acute phase of myocardial infarction.

Authors:  A A Adgey; J D Allen; J S Geddes; R G James; S W Webb; S A Zaidi; J F Pantridge
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1971-09-04       Impact factor: 79.321

2.  Ventricular tachyarrhythmias and lignocaine prophylaxis in acute myocardial infarction. A clinical and therapeutic study.

Authors:  L Mogensen
Journal:  Acta Med Scand Suppl       Date:  1970

Review 3.  Antiarrhythmic drug effects on left ventricular performance.

Authors:  J P Bourke; J C Cowan; S Tansuphaswadikul; R W Campbell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1987-03       Impact factor: 29.983

4.  Arrhythmia in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy. II: Comparison of amiodarone and verapamil in treatment.

Authors:  W J McKenna; L Harris; G Perez; D M Krikler; C Oakley; J F Goodwin
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1981-08

Review 5.  Ventricular ectopic activity and its relevance to aircrew licensing.

Authors:  R W Campbell
Journal:  Eur Heart J       Date:  1984-03       Impact factor: 29.983

6.  Spontaneous variability of complex ventricular arrhythmias detected by long-term electrocardiographic recording.

Authors:  E L Michelson; J Morganroth
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1980-04       Impact factor: 29.690

7.  Ventricular arrhythmias in syndrome of balloon deformity of mitral valve. Definition of possible high risk group.

Authors:  R W Campbell; M G Godman; G I Fiddler; R M Marquis; D G Julian
Journal:  Br Heart J       Date:  1976-10

8.  Prognostic significance of 24 hour ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy: a prospective study.

Authors:  B J Maron; D D Savage; J K Wolfson; S E Epstein
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1981-08       Impact factor: 2.778

9.  Prophylactic antiarrhythmic therapy of high-risk survivors of myocardial infarction: lower mortality at 1 month but not at 1 year.

Authors:  S H Gottlieb; S C Achuff; E D Mellits; G Gerstenblith; K L Baughman; L Becker; N C Chandra; S Henley; J O Humphries; C Heck
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1987-04       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  Risk stratification and survival after myocardial infarction.

Authors: 
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1983-08-11       Impact factor: 91.245

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.