Literature DB >> 7418504

The development of visual accommodation during early infancy.

M S Banks.   

Abstract

4 experiments were conducted concerning the development of visual accommodation in 1- to 3-month-old infants. In experiments 1 and 2 dynamic retinoscopy was used to measure accomodation responses at 3 stimulus distances. The results of experiment 1 revealed better accommodative capability from 1 to 3 months than reported originally. The procedure of experiment 2 was somewhat different but the results confirmed those of experiment 1. In experiment 3, accommodative responses at 7 stimulus distances were carefully measured in a small number of infants. These data provided estimates of the shape of infants' accommodation functions. In experiment 4, we used infrared photography to measure infants' pupil diameters while they viewed the stimuli of experiments 1 and 2. 2 simple hypotheses of the developmental mechanisms which underlie early accommodative development were considered. First, development of the motor component of the accommodative system might determine accommodative development. Second, development of the sensory component of the accommodative system might determine the observed development. The first hypothesis was tentatively rejected because it is inconsistent with some clinical findings. Evaluation of the second hypothesis involved calculating infants' depth of focus. We used those depth-of-focus values to predict how well infants of different ages should accommodate if their only limitation were in the sensory component of the accommodative system. The agreement between those predictions and observed accommodation was excellent, suggesting that changes in depth of focus in the first 3 months are largely responsible for growth in accommodation. The theoretical implications of this finding are discussed.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7418504

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Child Dev        ISSN: 0009-3920


  26 in total

Review 1.  Behavioral and neural representation of emotional facial expressions across the lifespan.

Authors:  Leah H Somerville; Negar Fani; Erin B McClure-Tone
Journal:  Dev Neuropsychol       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.253

2.  Human infants' accommodation responses to dynamic stimuli.

Authors:  Grazyna M Tondel; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 4.799

Review 3.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

4.  Accommodative lag and refractive error in infants and toddlers.

Authors:  Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-03-15       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Higher order monochromatic aberrations of the human infant eye.

Authors:  Jingyun Wang; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J Vis       Date:  2005-06-23       Impact factor: 2.240

Review 6.  Developmental physiological optics and visual acuity: a brief review.

Authors:  J V Odom; M Green
Journal:  Experientia       Date:  1984-11-15

7.  Development of a quantitative method to measure vision in children with chronic cortical visual impairment.

Authors:  W V Good
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2001

8.  The accommodative lag of the young hyperopic patient.

Authors:  T Rowan Candy; Kathryn H Gray; Christy C Hohenbary; Don W Lyon
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2012-01-17       Impact factor: 4.799

9.  Vision development in the monocular individual: implications for the mechanisms of normal binocular vision development and the treatment of infantile esotropia.

Authors:  S Day
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  1995

10.  Lens regeneration using endogenous stem cells with gain of visual function.

Authors:  Haotian Lin; Hong Ouyang; Jie Zhu; Shan Huang; Zhenzhen Liu; Shuyi Chen; Guiqun Cao; Gen Li; Robert A J Signer; Yanxin Xu; Christopher Chung; Ying Zhang; Danni Lin; Sherrina Patel; Frances Wu; Huimin Cai; Jiayi Hou; Cindy Wen; Maryam Jafari; Xialin Liu; Lixia Luo; Jin Zhu; Austin Qiu; Rui Hou; Baoxin Chen; Jiangna Chen; David Granet; Christopher Heichel; Fu Shang; Xuri Li; Michal Krawczyk; Dorota Skowronska-Krawczyk; Yujuan Wang; William Shi; Daniel Chen; Zheng Zhong; Sheng Zhong; Liangfang Zhang; Shaochen Chen; Sean J Morrison; Richard L Maas; Kang Zhang; Yizhi Liu
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 49.962

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.