Literature DB >> 22424817

Accommodative lag and refractive error in infants and toddlers.

Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To measure accommodative performance as a function of refractive error in very young children.
METHODS: This was a prospective study of accommodation lag in multiethnic typically developing children ages 5 to 24 months. Accommodation lag was measured by means of a modified bell retinoscopy technique. Refraction was measured by cycloplegic retinoscopy, and right and left eye results were averaged. The study compared accommodative performance to cycloplegic spherical equivalent and astigmatic refractive error.
RESULTS: Analysis of data from 189 of 203 subjects revealed that larger lags and lower gain of the accommodative response were more common in younger children, although most children of all ages accommodated well, with 95% having lags <1.25 D. Larger accommodation lags were associated with greater spherical equivalent refractive error, although only with hyperopia ≥4.0 D were lags ≥1.25 D observed in a majority of children. Larger lags in the more hyperopic meridian were seen with increasing hyperopic with-the-rule astigmatism, but lag in the more hyperopic meridian varied little with the amount of myopic or mixed astigmatism.
CONCLUSIONS: Most 5- to 24-month-old children accommodate well over a range of moderate hyperopic refractive errors, but hyperopia ≥4.0 D is rarely associated with normal accommodative performance. Hyperopic and mixed or myopic astigmatic children show different patterns of accommodation, which may explain the patterns of visual acuity deficits seen in these children.
Copyright © 2012 American Association for Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 22424817      PMCID: PMC3336047          DOI: 10.1016/j.jaapos.2011.10.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J AAPOS        ISSN: 1091-8531            Impact factor:   1.220


  19 in total

1.  Gender differences in early accommodation and vergence development.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 3.117

2.  Amblyopia in astigmatic preschool children.

Authors:  Velma Dobson; Joseph M Miller; Erin M Harvey; Kathleen M Mohan
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.886

3.  A photorefractive study of infant accommodation.

Authors:  O Braddick; J Atkinson; J French; H C Howland
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1979       Impact factor: 1.886

4.  Dynamic retinoscopy: the missing data.

Authors:  D G Hunter
Journal:  Surv Ophthalmol       Date:  2001 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 6.048

5.  Hypo-accommodation responses in hypermetropic infants and children.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Br J Ophthalmol       Date:  2010-07-05       Impact factor: 4.638

Review 6.  The epidemiology of early childhood hyperopia.

Authors:  Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Receding and disparity cues aid relaxation of accommodation.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-11       Impact factor: 1.973

Review 8.  Development and treatment of astigmatism-related amblyopia.

Authors:  Erin M Harvey
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

9.  Modified bell retinoscopy: measuring accommodative lag in children.

Authors:  Kristina Tarczy-Hornoch
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-12       Impact factor: 1.973

10.  Accommodation, acuity, and their relationship to emmetropization in infants.

Authors:  Donald O Mutti; G Lynn Mitchell; Lisa A Jones; Nina E Friedman; Sara L Frane; Wendy K Lin; Melvin L Moeschberger; Karla Zadnik
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.973

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  Why do only some hyperopes become strabismic?

Authors:  Erin Babinsky; T Rowan Candy
Journal:  Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 4.799

2.  Visual Function of Moderately Hyperopic 4- and 5-Year-Old Children in the Vision in Preschoolers - Hyperopia in Preschoolers Study.

Authors:  Elise B Ciner; Marjean Taylor Kulp; Maureen G Maguire; Maxwell Pistilli; T Rowan Candy; Bruce Moore; Gui-Shuang Ying; Graham Quinn; Gale Orlansky; Lynn Cyert
Journal:  Am J Ophthalmol       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.258

3.  Impact of Cognitive Demand during Sustained Near Tasks in Children and Adults.

Authors:  Tawna L Roberts; Ruth E Manny; Julia S Benoit; Heather A Anderson
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2018-03       Impact factor: 1.973

4.  Which hyperopic patients are destined for trouble?

Authors:  T Rowan Candy
Journal:  J AAPOS       Date:  2012-04       Impact factor: 1.220

5.  Subjective versus objective accommodative amplitude: preschool to presbyopia.

Authors:  Heather A Anderson; Karla K Stuebing
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  2014-11       Impact factor: 1.973

6.  Performance of Glow Fixation GoCheck Kids and 2WIN Photoscreeners and Retinomax to Uncover Hyperopia.

Authors:  Alexa H Levitt; Samuel J Martin; Robert W Arnold
Journal:  Clin Ophthalmol       Date:  2020-08-10

7.  Developmental changes in the balance of disparity, blur, and looming/proximity cues to drive ocular alignment and focus.

Authors:  Anna M Horwood; Patricia M Riddell
Journal:  Perception       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 1.490

8.  Six Year Refractive Change among White Children and Young Adults: Evidence for Significant Increase in Myopia among White UK Children.

Authors:  Sara J McCullough; Lisa O'Donoghue; Kathryn J Saunders
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-01-19       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  The biometric parameters of aniso-astigmatism and its risk factor in Chinese preschool children: the Nanjing eye study.

Authors:  Haohai Tong; Qingfeng Hao; Zijin Wang; Yue Wang; Rui Li; Xiaoyan Zhao; Qigang Sun; Xiaohan Zhang; Xuejuan Chen; Hui Zhu; Dan Huang; Hu Liu
Journal:  BMC Ophthalmol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 2.209

10.  Ocular findings in 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: A systematic literature review and results of a Dutch multicenter study.

Authors:  Emma N M M von Scheibler; Emy S van der Valk Bouman; Myrthe A Nuijts; Noël J C Bauer; Tos T J M Berendschot; Pit Vermeltfoort; Levinus A Bok; Agnies M van Eeghen; Michiel L Houben; Thérèse A M J van Amelsvoort; Erik Boot; Michelle B van Egmond-Ebbeling
Journal:  Am J Med Genet A       Date:  2021-11-12       Impact factor: 2.578

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.