Literature DB >> 7411462

Comparison of electromyogram spectra with force spectra during human elbow tremor.

P B Matthews, R B Muir.   

Abstract

1. The tremor that develops when the elbow is flexed against a spring attached at the wrist has been analysed by determining the 'power' spectrum of the demodulated surface e.m.g. recorded from two of the active muscles, biceps and brachioradialis. This was compared with the corresponding force spectrum obtained by analysis of the force developed at the fixed end of the spring (normally one of stiffness 2.8 N/mm); this force is directly proportional to the movement at the wrist. 2. When the subject was maintaining a high target force (100-160 N), with the aid of a visual display, the tremor was large with a large sharply tuned peak in the force spectrum and there was a clear peak at the same frequency in the e.m.g. spectrum. The coherence (gamma) between the force peak and the corresponding e.m.g. peak typically had a value of 0.95 or above, indicating a high degree of correlation. 3. On developing the same target force against a rigid restraint (70 N/mm) the peak in the force spectrum was absent or very much smaller and less sharply tuned. More particularly, the tremor-related peak seen in the e.m.g. spectrum under compliant conditions was no longer present under rigid conditions. 4. At low target forces (20-40 N) with compliant loading there was a small peak in the force spectrum but no peak could be detected in the e.m.g. spectrum. With increasing target force the mechanical tremor increased considerably and a peak progressively emerged from above the background level in the e.m.g. spectrum, accompanied by the development of a corresponding peak in the coherence spectrum. Thus the difference in detectability of peaks in the e.m.g. and force spectra might simply result from differences in the background 'noise' level of the two types of spectra. 5. Changing the spring stiffness in the range 0.7-12.5 N/mm altered the frequency of the mechanically recorded tremor by 1.5-2 Hz and the peak in the e.m.g. spectrum shifted in approximate correspondence. 6. The findings support the view that the tremor seen with compliant loading of the arm is due to the stretch reflex. In addition, this work should help define the conditions under which spectral analysis of the gross e.m.g. is of practical utility.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7411462      PMCID: PMC1282859          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1980.sp013254

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  7 in total

1.  Stretch reflex and servo action in a variety of human muscles.

Authors:  C D Marsden; P A Merton; H B Morton
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-07       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Motor-unit activity responsible for 8- to 12-Hz component of human physiological finger tremor.

Authors:  R J Elble; J E Randall
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1976-03       Impact factor: 2.714

3.  Interactions between the stretch reflex and a 'repeat tendency' of the motoneurone pool in the human [proceedings].

Authors:  P M Rack; H F Ross; D K Walters
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1979-05       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The forces generated at the human elbow joint in response to imposed sinusoidal movements of the forearm.

Authors:  G C Joyce; P M Rack; H F Ross
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Relationship between forearm tremor and the biceps electromyogram.

Authors:  J R Fox; J E Randall
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.531

6.  The effects of load and force on tremor at the normal human elbow joint.

Authors:  G C Joyce; P M Rack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1974-07       Impact factor: 5.182

7.  Neuronal mechanisms underlying physiological tremor.

Authors:  J H Allum; V Dietz; H J Freund
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  1978-05       Impact factor: 2.714

  7 in total
  21 in total

1.  Periodontal anaesthesia reduces common 8 Hz input to masseters during isometric biting.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Mandibular physiological tremor is reduced by increasing-force ramp contractions and periodontal anaesthesia.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2007-08-08       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Interaction between short- and long-latency components of the human stretch reflex during sinusoidal stretching.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  Exploring the functional significance of physiological tremor: a biospectroscopic approach.

Authors:  D Goodman; J A Kelso
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  1983       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Parametric analysis of dynamic postural responses.

Authors:  S A Werness; D J Anderson
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1984       Impact factor: 2.086

6.  Analysis of bimodal interspike interval histograms of primary muscle spindle endings in active triceps surae muscles of cats.

Authors:  U Windhorst; W Koehler
Journal:  Pflugers Arch       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 3.657

7.  A study of the muscle force waveform using a population stochastic model of skeletal muscle.

Authors:  C N Christakos
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1982       Impact factor: 2.086

8.  Observations on the time course of the electromyographic response reflexly elicited by muscle vibration in man.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1984-08       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Frequency response characteristics of a multi-loop representation of the segmental muscle stretch reflex.

Authors:  W Koehler; U Windhorst
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1981       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  Observations on the automatic compensation of reflex gain on varying the pre-existing level of motor discharge in man.

Authors:  P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1986-05       Impact factor: 5.182

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.