Literature DB >> 4419584

The effects of load and force on tremor at the normal human elbow joint.

G C Joyce, P M Rack.   

Abstract

1. Spontaneous flexion-extension tremor of the elbow was recorded in normal human subjects while they exerted a flexing force against different loads.2. Increases in the flexing force up to (1/2) or (3/4) of the subject's maximum were accompanied by increases in the amplitude of the tremor. A further increase to very large forces was associated with a decrease in tremor.3. When the subject flexed against a spring, the frequency of the tremor was related to the properties of the spring; with increasingly stiff springs the tremor frequency increased up to about 12 Hz. With the stiffest springs, however, the tremor became irregular and very small in amplitude.4. Weights added to the limb at the wrist reduced the frequency of tremor.5. By using appropriate combinations of spring and mass, the principal tremor frequency could be adjusted between 2 and 12 Hz, higher in some subjects. Within this range the frequency(2) was approximately proportional to the spring stiffness/mass, just as it is in a spring-mass system, though the forearm provided some of this mass, and some of the spring-like resistance was in the flexor muscles.6. When by suitable loading the tremor frequency was brought between 8 and 12 Hz, and the subject forcibly flexed his elbow, the tremor became regular and large in amplitude. This was a form of limited instability in the stretch reflex which arose because a powerful reflex response to extension of the elbow acted back on the flexor muscles after a delay.7. When the limb was so loaded that its natural frequency was outside this 8-12 Hz range, it behaved as a filter, and in response to any disturbing noise it oscillated mainly at frequencies close to the natural frequencies of either the mechanical system or the stretch reflex.8. This filtering function of the limb with its stretch reflex probably plays an important part in the control of normal movement and tremor.9. The large flexing forces that were here associated with vigorous tremor normally occur when a limb supports a large mass. Such a mass would give the mechanical system within the limb a low natural frequency; inconveniently large oscillations in the 8-12 Hz range would therefore seldom occur.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1974        PMID: 4419584      PMCID: PMC1331021          DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1974.sp010615

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Physiol        ISSN: 0022-3751            Impact factor:   5.182


  15 in total

1.  Nervous gradation of muscular contraction.

Authors:  P H HAMMOND; P A MERTON; G G SUTTON
Journal:  Br Med Bull       Date:  1956-09       Impact factor: 4.291

2.  An analysis of the frequencies of finger tremor in healthy subjects.

Authors:  A M HALLIDAY; J W REDFEARN
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1956-12-28       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Mechanical factors in human tremor frequency.

Authors:  R N Stiles; J E Randall
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1967-09       Impact factor: 3.531

4.  Effect of deafferentation on human physiological tremor.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Meadows; G W Lange; R S Watson
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1967-09-30       Impact factor: 79.321

5.  The frequency and pattern of normal tremor.

Authors:  C B Yap; B Boshes
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1967-03

6.  Variations in human physiological finger tremor, with particular reference to changes with age.

Authors:  C D Marsden; J C Meadows; G W Lange; R S Watson
Journal:  Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol       Date:  1969-08

7.  Relationship between forearm tremor and the biceps electromyogram.

Authors:  J R Fox; J E Randall
Journal:  J Appl Physiol       Date:  1970-07       Impact factor: 3.531

8.  The effect of force on elbow tremor.

Authors:  G C Joyce; P M Rack
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-07       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  The variation of hand tremor with force in healthy subjects.

Authors:  G G Sutton; K Sykes
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1967-08       Impact factor: 5.182

10.  Observations on the control of stepping and hopping movements in man.

Authors:  G M Jones; D G Watt
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1971-12       Impact factor: 5.182

View more
  62 in total

1.  Common modulation of motor unit pairs during slow wrist movement in man.

Authors:  N Kakuda; M Nagaoka; J Wessberg
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  The effects of fusimotor stimulation during small amplitude stretching on the frequency-response of the primary ending of the mammalian muscle spindle.

Authors:  G M Goodwin; M Hulliger; P B Matthews
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1975-12       Impact factor: 5.182

3.  Stretch reflex gain in cat triceps surae muscles with compliant loads.

Authors:  Sophie J De Serres; David J Bennett; Richard B Stein
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2002-12-15       Impact factor: 5.182

4.  The effect of arginine vasopressin (AVP) on the distribution of fluid in the rat [proceedings].

Authors:  M A Floyer; D V Morris
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1976-12       Impact factor: 5.182

5.  Entrainment to extinction of physiological tremor by spindle afferent input.

Authors:  Ian Cathers; Nicholas O'Dwyer; Peter Neilson
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-24       Impact factor: 1.972

6.  Periodontal anaesthesia reduces common 8 Hz input to masseters during isometric biting.

Authors:  Paul F Sowman; Russell S A Brinkworth; Kemal S Türker
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-11-18       Impact factor: 1.972

7.  The amplitude of force variability is correlated in the knee extensor and elbow flexor muscles.

Authors:  Brian L Tracy; Paul D Mehoudar; Justus D Ortega
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2006-08-04       Impact factor: 1.972

8.  Postural control at the human wrist.

Authors:  John Z Z Chew; Simon C Gandevia; Richard C Fitzpatrick
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2008-01-10       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Tremor and other oscillations in neuromuscular systems.

Authors:  R B Stein; M N Oğuztöreli
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 2.086

10.  In-Situ Force Augmentation Improves Surface Contact and Force Control.

Authors:  Randy Lee; Roberta L Klatzky; George D Stetten
Journal:  IEEE Trans Haptics       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 2.487

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.