Literature DB >> 7401147

An assessment of physician knowledge of epidemiology and biostatistics.

S T Weiss, J M Samet.   

Abstract

A review was conducted of 585 articles in the medical literature, and the articles were categorized by study design and by statistical techniques employed. In the majority, statistics were utilized primarily for data description and hypothesis-testing. Descriptive studies were most frequent, and only a minority were epidemiological investigations. A questionnaire designed to assess knowledge of biostatistics and epidemiology relevant to this literature was administered to internists and medical house staff at a teaching hospital. Of 229 questionnaire recipients, 141 responded and achieved a mean score of 7.4 with 10.0 possible. Practicing physicians had a significantly lower mean score than house staff and full-time faculty. Scores were higher for the 44 percent of respondents who reported prior training in epidemiology or in biostatistics. The results of the journal review suggest that knowledge of basic biostatistics and of study design is important for reading medical literature. Physicians with prior training in epidemiology and in biostatistics appear to be better prepared for this task.

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7401147     DOI: 10.1097/00001888-198008000-00007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Educ        ISSN: 0022-2577


  12 in total

1.  [Profile of biostatistics utilization in three medical reviews. Implications for medical education].

Authors:  R J Gagnon; R Marchand; M Marcil
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  1996-05       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Critical appraisal: more work to be done.

Authors:  M Linzer
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Shared Decision Making in the Emergency Department Among Patients With Limited Health Literacy: Beyond Slower and Louder.

Authors:  Richard T Griffey; Candace D McNaughton; Danielle M McCarthy; Erica Shelton; Ana Castaneda-Guarderas; Angela Young-Brinn; Donna Fowler; Corita Grudszen
Journal:  Acad Emerg Med       Date:  2016-11-25       Impact factor: 3.451

4.  Hyperlink-Embedded Journal Articles Improve Statistical Knowledge and Reader Satisfaction.

Authors:  David Saxon; Alexander T Pearson; Peter Wu
Journal:  J Grad Med Educ       Date:  2015-12

5.  Common statistical concerns in clinical trials.

Authors:  Scott R Evans
Journal:  J Exp Stroke Transl Med       Date:  2010-02-09

6.  Impact of an evidence-based medicine curriculum based on adult learning theory.

Authors:  M L Green; P J Ellis
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 5.128

Review 7.  Prescribers' Knowledge and Skills for Interpreting Research Results: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Leila Kahwati; Dennis Carmody; Nancy Berkman; Helen W Sullivan; Kathryn J Aikin; Jessica DeFrank
Journal:  J Contin Educ Health Prof       Date:  2017       Impact factor: 1.355

8.  Statistical reviewing policies of medical journals: caveat lector?

Authors:  S N Goodman; D G Altman; S L George
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 5.128

9.  Statistics: The stethoscope of a thinking urologist.

Authors:  Arun S Sivanandam
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2009-04

10.  Assessment of cognitive biases and biostatistics knowledge of medical residents: a multicenter, cross-sectional questionnaire study.

Authors:  Pavlos Msaouel; Theocharis Kappos; Athanasios Tasoulis; Alexandros P Apostolopoulos; Ioannis Lekkas; Elli-Sophia Tripodaki; Nikolaos C Keramaris
Journal:  Med Educ Online       Date:  2014-03-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.