Literature DB >> 24453383

Cross-linguistic differences in prosodic cues to syntactic disambiguation in German and English.

Mary Grantham O'Brien1, Carrie N Jackson2, Christine E Gardner2.   

Abstract

This study examined whether late-learning English-German L2 learners and late-learning German-English L2 learners use prosodic cues to disambiguate temporarily ambiguous L1 and L2 sentences during speech production. Experiments 1a and 1b showed that English-German L2 learners and German-English L2 learners used a pitch rise and pitch accent to disambiguate prepositional phrase-attachment sentences in German. However, the same participants, as well as monolingual English speakers, only used pitch accent to disambiguate similar English sentences. Taken together, these results indicate the L2 learners used prosody to disambiguate sentences in both of their languages and did not fully transfer cues to disambiguation from their L1 to their L2. The results have implications for the acquisition of L2 prosody and the interaction between prosody and meaning in L2 production.

Entities:  

Year:  2014        PMID: 24453383      PMCID: PMC3894114          DOI: 10.1017/S0142716412000252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Appl Psycholinguist        ISSN: 0142-7164


  19 in total

1.  Intonational disambiguation in sentence production and comprehension.

Authors:  A J Schafer; S R Speer; P Warren; S D White
Journal:  J Psycholinguist Res       Date:  2000-03

2.  Phonetics and phonology of thematic contrast in German.

Authors:  Bettina Braun
Journal:  Lang Speech       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 1.500

3.  Multilevel models for the experimental psychologist: foundations and illustrative examples.

Authors:  Lesa Hoffman; Michael J Rovine
Journal:  Behav Res Methods       Date:  2007-02

4.  The use of prosody in syntactic disambiguation.

Authors:  P J Price; M Ostendorf; S Shattuck-Hufnagel; C Fong
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 1.840

5.  Greater sensitivity to prosodic goodness in non-native than in native listeners (L).

Authors:  Anne Cutler
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2009-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Effects of prosodic and lexical constraints on parsing in young children (and adults).

Authors:  Jesse Snedeker
Journal:  J Mem Lang       Date:  2008-02       Impact factor: 3.059

7.  Resolving attachment ambiguities with multiple constraints.

Authors:  M Spivey-Knowlton; J C Sedivy
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1995-06

8.  Duration as a cue to the perception of a phrase boundary.

Authors:  D R Scott
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1982-04       Impact factor: 1.840

9.  Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults.

Authors:  Ken J Hoyte; Hiram Brownell; Arthur Wingfield
Journal:  Exp Aging Res       Date:  2009 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.645

10.  Children's processing of prosodic cues for phrasal interpretation.

Authors:  C M Beach; W F Katz; A Skowronski
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  1996-02       Impact factor: 1.840

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.