Literature DB >> 7382513

Lymph node biopsy for diagnosis: a statistical study.

Y Lee, R Terry, R J Lukes.   

Abstract

This is a retrospective and all inclusive study of 925 patients who had isolated lymph node biopsies for diagnosis from 1973 to 1977. Overall, 60% of the nodes had benign lesions, 28% carcinoma, and 12% lymphoma. The comparable figures for abdominal nodal biopsies were 63%, 33% and 4%; for intrathoracic nodes, 73%, 26% and 1%; for peripheral nodes, 56%, 29% and 15%. Detailed distribution according to specific site of nodal biopsy, histological subtypes, age, and sex of patients are presented. Statistically, age is the most important factor useful in estimating the probability of whether the lymphadenopathy is due to a benign or malignant process.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7382513     DOI: 10.1002/jso.2930140108

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  9 in total

1.  Demographic, clinical and laboratory characteristics for differential diagnosis of peripheral lymphadenopathy (LAP) and the etiologic distribution of LAP in adults; a multicenter, nested case-control study including 1401 patients from Turkey.

Authors:  Ercan Yenilmez; Yıldız Verdi; Ayca Ilbak; Burcu Caliskan Demirkiran; Zehra Duman; Fatma Bozkurt; Derya Seyman; Ali Asan; Halime Betul Sahin Eker; Mehmet Resat Ceylan; Salih Emre; Gozde Ozturk Altunyurt; Saliha Ayan; Emine Parlak; Goknur Yapar Toros; Gulsen Yoruk; Mehmet Ceylan; Leman Karaagac; Muge Ozguler; Busra Meral; Muzeyyen Ay; Cinar Ozturk; Zehra Karacaer; Ersin Tural; Rıza Aytac Cetinkaya; Ilyas Dokmetas; Sukran Kose
Journal:  Intern Emerg Med       Date:  2021-03-17       Impact factor: 3.397

2.  Cervical lymphadenopathy: study of 251 patients.

Authors:  Basel Al Kadah; Hristo Hristov Popov; Bernhard Schick; Dirk Knöbber
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.503

3.  Histological Surprises in Benign Cytologies after Lymph Node Biopsy-Surgeon's Knife Improving Patient Care.

Authors:  Mario Victor Newton; Rakesh S Ramesh; Suraj Manjunath; K ShivaKumar; Hemanth G Nanjappa; Ramu Damuluri; Elvis Peter Joseph; C Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-29

4.  Waiting time to lymph node biopsy is dependent on referral method: don't write, phone!

Authors:  S A J Pannick; C L Ingham Clark
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.891

Review 5.  [Differential diagnosis and diagnostic strategies of lymphadenopathy].

Authors:  W Jung; L Trümper
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2008-03       Impact factor: 0.743

6.  Diagnostic biopsy of lymph nodes of the neck, axilla and groin: rhyme, reason or chance?

Authors:  James W Moor; Patrick Murray; Jane Inwood; David Gouldesbrough; Chris Bem
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

7.  Cervical lymphadenopathy: Unwinding the hidden truth.

Authors:  Athira Aruna Ramadas; Renju Jose; Beena Varma; Marina Lazar Chandy
Journal:  Dent Res J (Isfahan)       Date:  2017 Jan-Feb

8.  Usefulness of lactate dehydrogenase in differentiating abnormal cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Naoko Kamiya; Yukiko Ishikawa; Taro Takeshima; Yuka Sagara; Sayaka Yamamoto; Makiko Naka Mieno; Kazuhiko Kotani; Masami Matsumura
Journal:  J Gen Fam Med       Date:  2020-10-18

9.  Rapid access multidisciplinary lymph node diagnostic clinic: analysis of 550 patients.

Authors:  I Chau; M T Kelleher; D Cunningham; A R Norman; A Wotherspoon; P Trott; P Rhys-Evans; G Querci Della Rovere; G Brown; M Allen; J S Waters; S Haque; T Murray; L Bishop
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2003-02-10       Impact factor: 7.640

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.