Literature DB >> 18430337

Diagnostic biopsy of lymph nodes of the neck, axilla and groin: rhyme, reason or chance?

James W Moor1, Patrick Murray, Jane Inwood, David Gouldesbrough, Chris Bem.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Improving patient pathways of care is becoming increasingly important in the delivery of timely, appropriate surgical care. With this aim, we analysed the referral and management pathway of patients undergoing diagnostic superficial lymph node biopsy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A retrospective review of case notes of patients undergoing diagnostic superficial lymph node biopsy over 3 years, 1998-2000 at the Bradford Hospitals NHS Trust. Indication for surgical biopsy was based on clinical suspicion following assessment in the out-patient clinic for the majority, and arrangement of investigations as deemed appropriate. There were no clinical algorithms in use during the study period.
RESULTS: There was no evidence for the use of explicit protocols for referral or management. Biopsy was often delayed. Of 268 patients referred from primary care, referral was made to any of 14 hospital Department with 39% (105 of 268) attending more than one outpatient appointment, and 155 (41 of 268) attending more than one department. Eighteen percent (47 of 268) of patients were informed of their diagnosis within 6 weeks of referral and 42% (113 of 268) within 3 months of referral. Nine percent (24 of 268) underwent pre-operative fine needle aspiration cytology. Of patients with enlarged neck nodes, 29% (52/180) had examination of the upper aero-digestive tract.
CONCLUSIONS: The study supports the introduction of co-ordinated problem-based referral and management pathways for the management of patients with enlarged superficial lymph nodes supported by regular audits of practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 18430337      PMCID: PMC2430458          DOI: 10.1308/003588408X242105

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  34 in total

1.  One-stop neck lump clinic: phase 2 of audit. How are we doing?

Authors:  A Kishore; C J Stewart; G W McGarry; K MacKenzie
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2001-12

2.  One-stop neck lump clinic.

Authors:  A McCombe; E George
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2002-10

3.  The child with lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  W W Zuelzer; J Kaplan
Journal:  Semin Hematol       Date:  1975-07       Impact factor: 3.851

4.  The clinical investigation of lymphadenopathy in primary care practice.

Authors:  S Greenfield; M C Jordan
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1978-09-22       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Childhood cervical lymphadenitis: a reappraisal.

Authors:  L L Barton; R D Feigin
Journal:  J Pediatr       Date:  1974-06       Impact factor: 4.406

6.  Peripheral lymphadenopathy in childhood. Ten-year experience with excisional biopsy.

Authors:  A M Lake; F A Oski
Journal:  Am J Dis Child       Date:  1978-04

7.  Biopsy of enlarged, superficial lymph nodes.

Authors:  S Sinclair; E Beckman; L Ellman
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1974-04-29       Impact factor: 56.272

8.  Patients with neck lumps: can they be managed in a 'one-stop' clinic setting?

Authors:  A Murray; C J Stewart; G W McGarry; K MacKenzie
Journal:  Clin Otolaryngol Allied Sci       Date:  2000-12

9.  Fine-needle aspiration of superficial and deeply seated lymph nodes on patients with and without a history of malignancy: review of 439 cases.

Authors:  Kristian T Schafernak; Larry F Kluskens; Reshma Ariga; Vijaya B Reddy; Paolo Gattuso
Journal:  Diagn Cytopathol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 1.582

Review 10.  Childhood cervical lymphadenopathy.

Authors:  Alexander K C Leung; W Lane M Robson
Journal:  J Pediatr Health Care       Date:  2004 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.812

View more
  7 in total

1.  Cervical lymphadenopathy: study of 251 patients.

Authors:  Basel Al Kadah; Hristo Hristov Popov; Bernhard Schick; Dirk Knöbber
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2014-10-08       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Histological Surprises in Benign Cytologies after Lymph Node Biopsy-Surgeon's Knife Improving Patient Care.

Authors:  Mario Victor Newton; Rakesh S Ramesh; Suraj Manjunath; K ShivaKumar; Hemanth G Nanjappa; Ramu Damuluri; Elvis Peter Joseph; C Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-29

3.  Waiting time to lymph node biopsy is dependent on referral method: don't write, phone!

Authors:  S A J Pannick; C L Ingham Clark
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2009-09-25       Impact factor: 1.891

4.  [Initial patient assessment of infectious diseases and diagnostic steps with fever].

Authors:  A Schibli; M Weisser; R Bingisser; A F Widmer; M Battegay
Journal:  Internist (Berl)       Date:  2013-08       Impact factor: 0.743

5.  Time to diagnosis and associated costs of an outpatient vs inpatient setting in the diagnosis of lymphoma: a retrospective study of a large cohort of major lymphoma subtypes in Spain.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch; Carmen Sanclemente-Ansó; Ona Escoda; Esther Monclús; Jonathan Franco-Vanegas; Pedro Moreno; Mar Guerra-García; Neus Guasch; Alfons López-Soto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.430

6.  A rare case of the superior vena cava obstruction in a 16-year-old boy with Burkitt's lymphoma: A case report.

Authors:  Mohammad N Alfahadi; Fatima A Malik; Alzahraa S Almahlawi; Wejdan A Alhamdan
Journal:  J Taibah Univ Med Sci       Date:  2021-01-07

7.  Peripheral Lymph Node Excisional Biopsy: Yield, Relevance, and Outcomes in a Remote Surgical Setup.

Authors:  Ashish Lal Shrestha; Pradita Shrestha
Journal:  Surg Res Pract       Date:  2018-03-20
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.