Literature DB >> 19785939

Waiting time to lymph node biopsy is dependent on referral method: don't write, phone!

S A J Pannick1, C L Ingham Clark.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Patients with lymphadenopathy are commonly referred to general surgeons for diagnostic lymph node biopsy. We were concerned at potential long waits for this service in our hospital and thus wanted to compare the efficiency of written and telephone referral with a view to identifying the optimum care pathway for these patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Sixty patients were included in a 2-year retrospective review (excluding referrals associated with breast lumps which were managed separately). Hospital Episode Statistics data were used to analyse notes for the source and method of referral, waiting time to biopsy, clinic attendance and diagnosis.
RESULTS: Of referrals, 33% were from haematology and 28% from general practice. Overall, 47% of patients were referred by letter; of these, 64% were seen in clinic before biopsy. Personal referral between clinicians, by direct discussion, e-mail or fax led to a mean wait of 4 days, compared to 51 days when patients were referred by letter. Clinic attendance had no significant bearing on diagnostic accuracy or complication rate. Neoplasia accounted for 43% of diagnoses and infection (including four cases of tuberculosis) for 10%. Of biopsies, 33% showed benign changes, 8% were unrecorded and 5% were incorrect.
CONCLUSIONS: In this study, 43% of biopsies revealed malignancy and we advise that lymph node biopsy requests should be managed on a fast-track pathway, expedited by direct personal request. Following this study, we have implemented a fast-track pathway for such patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19785939      PMCID: PMC2966246          DOI: 10.1308/003588409X12486167521118

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl        ISSN: 0035-8843            Impact factor:   1.891


  27 in total

1.  Referral pathways and diagnosis: UK government actions fail to recognize complexity of lymphoma.

Authors:  D A Howell; A G Smith; E Roman
Journal:  Eur J Cancer Care (Engl)       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.520

2.  Lymph node biopsy for diagnosis: a statistical study.

Authors:  Y Lee; R Terry; R J Lukes
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1980       Impact factor: 3.454

3.  A clinic for the rapid processing of patients with neck masses.

Authors:  R H Vowles; S Ghiacy; A F Jefferis
Journal:  J Laryngol Otol       Date:  1998-11       Impact factor: 1.469

4.  Malignant neck lumps: a measured approach.

Authors:  M A Birchall; N D Stafford; G P Walsh-Waring
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1991-03       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  Biopsy of peripheral lymph nodes.

Authors:  Y T Lee; R Terry; R J Lukes
Journal:  Am Surg       Date:  1982-10       Impact factor: 0.688

6.  Lymphadenopathy as a primary presenting sign: a clinicopathological study of 228 cases.

Authors:  P P Anthony; S A Knowles
Journal:  Br J Surg       Date:  1983-07       Impact factor: 6.939

7.  The management of a neck mass: presenting feature of an asymptomatic head and neck primary malignancy?

Authors:  M Barakat; L M Flood; V H Oswal; R W Ruckley
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1987-07       Impact factor: 1.891

8.  Diagnostic biopsy of lymph nodes of the neck, axilla and groin: rhyme, reason or chance?

Authors:  James W Moor; Patrick Murray; Jane Inwood; David Gouldesbrough; Chris Bem
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  2008-04       Impact factor: 1.891

9.  Clinical-histologic-microbiologic analysis of 419 lymph node biopsy specimens.

Authors:  E E Freidig; S P McClure; W R Wilson; P M Banks; J A Washington
Journal:  Rev Infect Dis       Date:  1986 May-Jun

10.  Does the surgeon still have a role to play in the diagnosis and management of lymphomas?

Authors:  Gareth Morris-Stiff; Peipei Cheang; Steve Key; Anju Verghese; Timothy J Havard
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2008-02-04       Impact factor: 2.754

View more
  2 in total

1.  Histological Surprises in Benign Cytologies after Lymph Node Biopsy-Surgeon's Knife Improving Patient Care.

Authors:  Mario Victor Newton; Rakesh S Ramesh; Suraj Manjunath; K ShivaKumar; Hemanth G Nanjappa; Ramu Damuluri; Elvis Peter Joseph; C Prasad
Journal:  Indian J Surg Oncol       Date:  2016-11-29

2.  Time to diagnosis and associated costs of an outpatient vs inpatient setting in the diagnosis of lymphoma: a retrospective study of a large cohort of major lymphoma subtypes in Spain.

Authors:  Xavier Bosch; Carmen Sanclemente-Ansó; Ona Escoda; Esther Monclús; Jonathan Franco-Vanegas; Pedro Moreno; Mar Guerra-García; Neus Guasch; Alfons López-Soto
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 4.430

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.