Literature DB >> 7375969

Peer review in diabetes and hypertension: the relationship between care process and patient outcome.

F J Romm, B S Hulka.   

Abstract

To assess the effect of physician performance on patient outcomes, we examined the relationship between performance of essential care items and several patient outcomes in hypertension and diabetes. A group of internists in private practice selected the criteria and allowed their records to be reviewed to ascertain their adherence to these criteria and their patients' outcome status. Among all physicians and patients, adherence to criteria was not associated with a composite measure of control status or with blood sugar level in diabetes, or with blood pressure control in hypertension. Peer review groups should recognize the limitations in measuring care process and patient outcomes, and that adequacy of physician performance does not necessarily predict how well the patient will do.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1980        PMID: 7375969     DOI: 10.1097/00007611-198005000-00006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  South Med J        ISSN: 0038-4348            Impact factor:   0.954


  6 in total

Review 1.  Organizational structure and the delivery of primary care to older Americans.

Authors:  J S Zinn; V Mor
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 3.402

2.  Medical audit in general practice. Butterworth Prize Essay 1981.

Authors:  M G Sheldon
Journal:  J R Coll Gen Pract Occas Pap       Date:  1982

3.  Developing a quality measure for clinical inertia in diabetes care.

Authors:  Dan R Berlowitz; Arlene S Ash; Mark Glickman; Robert H Friedman; Leonard M Pogach; Audrey L Nelson; Ashley T Wong
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2005-12       Impact factor: 3.402

4.  Comparison of metabolic control among diabetic subjects at two clinics.

Authors:  P J O'Connor; R Fragneto; J Coulehan; B F Crabtree
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  1989 Sep-Oct       Impact factor: 2.792

5.  Does ambulatory process of care predict health-related quality of life outcomes for patients with chronic disease?

Authors:  Katherine L Kahn; Diana M Tisnado; John L Adams; Honghu Liu; Wen-Pin Chen; Fang Ashlee Hu; Carol M Mangione; Ronald D Hays; Cheryl L Damberg
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2007-02       Impact factor: 3.402

6.  Quality of care for hypertension in the United States.

Authors:  Steven M Asch; Elizabeth A McGlynn; Liisa Hiatt; John Adams; Jennifer Hicks; Alison DeCristofaro; Roland Chen; Pablo LaPuerta; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2005-01-07       Impact factor: 2.298

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.