Literature DB >> 2508176

Comparison of metabolic control among diabetic subjects at two clinics.

P J O'Connor1, R Fragneto, J Coulehan, B F Crabtree.   

Abstract

A cross-sectional study was conducted to investigate whether glucose control in 20 non-insulin-dependent diabetic subjects seen at a remote rural clinic was comparable to control achieved in 66 diabetic subjects seen at the regional hospital clinic. Sampling was done to assure that study subjects were representative of all care-seeking, diagnosed diabetics in a well-defined Navajo community. The two groups of patients were comparable in terms of age, sex, and duration of diabetes from time of diagnosis. Compliance with care, hospitalization rates, and complication rates were similar in each group. Results showed no significant differences in glycemic control between the rural clinic (mean fasting plasma glucose = 177, mean random plasma glucose = 227) and the regional hospital clinic (mean fasting plasma glucose = 187, mean random plasma glucose = 249). The percentages of diabetics under "acceptable" control by American Diabetes Association guidelines was 40 percent at the rural clinic and 29 percent at the hospital clinic (P greater than .05). The authors conclude that adequacy of glycemic control in diabetics is not compromised by providing care at a remote rural clinic.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1989        PMID: 2508176      PMCID: PMC1579964     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Public Health Rep        ISSN: 0033-3549            Impact factor:   2.792


  7 in total

1.  Metabolic control in non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus: factors associated with patient outcomes.

Authors:  P J O'Connor; R Fragneto; J Coulehan; B F Crabtree
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1987 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 19.112

2.  The clinical picture of diabetic control, studied in four settings.

Authors:  T F Williams; D A Martin; M D Hogan; J D Watkins; E V Ellis
Journal:  Am J Public Health Nations Health       Date:  1967-03

3.  Care process and patient outcome in diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  F J Romm; B S Hulka
Journal:  Med Care       Date:  1979-07       Impact factor: 2.983

4.  Metabolic control of diabetes in general practice clinics: comparison with a hospital clinic.

Authors:  B M Singh; M R Holland; P A Thorn
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

5.  Randomised controlled trial of routine hospital clinic care versus routine general practice care for type II diabetics.

Authors:  T M Hayes; J Harries
Journal:  Br Med J (Clin Res Ed)       Date:  1984-09-22

6.  Peer review in diabetes and hypertension: the relationship between care process and patient outcome.

Authors:  F J Romm; B S Hulka
Journal:  South Med J       Date:  1980-05       Impact factor: 0.954

7.  The Memphis and Atlanta continuing care programs for diabetes. II. Comparative analyses of demographic characteristics, treatment methods, and outcomes over a 9-10-year follow-up period.

Authors:  J K Davidson; R Vander Zwaag; C L Cox; H K Delcher; I Mainzer; H Baggett; J W Runyan
Journal:  Diabetes Care       Date:  1984 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 19.112

  7 in total
  1 in total

1.  Multimethod research: approaches for integrating qualitative and quantitative methods.

Authors:  K C Stange; W L Miller; B F Crabtree; P J O'Connor; S J Zyzanski
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  1994-05       Impact factor: 5.128

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.