Literature DB >> 16633810

Treatment of subtrochanteric fractures. A comparison of the Gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw: short-term outcome in 58 patients.

I Saarenpää1, T Heikkinen, P Jalovaara.   

Abstract

The aim of this non-randomised prospective study was to evaluate the short-term outcome of Gamma nail and dynamic hip screw (DHS) fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric hip fractures due to low-energy trauma in the elderly. All of the 1,624 femoral hip fractures in 1,511 patients of the Oulu Hospital, aged over 49 years, were prospectively registered from 1991-1999 using special forms. Seventy-three (4.5%) of the fractures were subtrochanteric. After exclusions, 58 patients constituted the final study group. Of these, 43 were treated with Gamma nails and 15 with DHS. Background factors before the fracture, complications, reoperations and functional parameters at 4 months were recorded using standardised forms. Intraoperative and hospital data were collected from patient records. The Seinsheimer fracture types IIIA, IIC and V were the most common fracture patterns when the Seinsheimer classification system was used, and Fielding II and AO 31A3.3, respectively, were the most common types in the Fielding and AO classification system. There were four (9%) intraoperative complications in the Gamma nail group as compared to none in the DHS group. On the other hand, postoperative complications were more common in the DHS group (27%) than in the Gamma nail group (7%). We recognised a correlation between certain fracture types and the likelihood of typical intra- or postoperative complications or difficulties with both devices: In Gamma nailing, difficulty in closed reduction as well as the rate of open reduction and the use of supplementary fixation were most frequent in the Seinsheimer IIC fractures. It is also noticeable that all of the postoperative device failures and fracture displacements of the DHS group occurred in the Seinsheimer type IIIA category. Detailed fracture classification is essential for the choice of the fixation device, and the present study confirms the presumption that, despite the perioperative problems associated with Gamma nailing, this technique may be preferable to plate fixation for specific fracture types with medial cortical comminution, such as Seinsheimer type IIIA.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16633810      PMCID: PMC2267546          DOI: 10.1007/s00264-006-0088-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Orthop        ISSN: 0341-2695            Impact factor:   3.075


  23 in total

1.  Fixation of intertrochanteric fractures of the femur. A randomised prospective comparison of the gamma nail and the dynamic hip screw.

Authors:  S H Bridle; A D Patel; M Bircher; P T Calvert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1991-03

2.  The Gamma nail--a significant advance or a passing fashion?

Authors:  P T Calvert
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1992-05

3.  Extramedullary fixation of 107 subtrochanteric fractures: a randomized multicenter trial of the Medoff sliding plate versus 3 other screw-plate systems.

Authors:  K Lunsjö; L Ceder; J Tidermark; P Hamberg; B E Larsson; B Ragnarsson; R W Knebel; I Allvin; K Hjalmars; S Norberg; P Fornander; A Hauggaard; L Stigsson
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1999-10

4.  Minimal invasive treatment of proximal femur fractures with the long gamma nail: indication, technique, results.

Authors:  T K Hotz; R Zellweger; K P Kach
Journal:  J Trauma       Date:  1999-11

5.  Unstable subtrochanteric fractures--gamma nail versus dynamic condylar screw.

Authors:  Andrés J Pakuts
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-08-26       Impact factor: 3.075

6.  Prospective comparison of hip fracture treatment. 856 cases followed for 4 months in The Netherlands and Sweden.

Authors:  M Berglund-Rödén; B A Swierstra; H Wingstrand; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1994-06

7.  A prospective randomised comparison of the dynamic hip screw and the gamma locking nail.

Authors:  P J Radford; M Needoff; J K Webb
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Br       Date:  1993-09

8.  Trochanteric hip fractures. Fixation failure commoner with femoral medialization, a comparison of 101 cases.

Authors:  M J Parker
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1996-08

9.  Treatment of hip fracture in Finland and Sweden. Prospective comparison of 788 cases in three hospitals.

Authors:  P Jalovaara; M Berglund-Rödén; H Wingstrand; K G Thorngren
Journal:  Acta Orthop Scand       Date:  1992-10

10.  Functional comparison between uncemented Austin-Moore hemiarthroplasty and osteosynthesis with three screws in displaced femoral neck fractures--a matched-pair study of 168 patients.

Authors:  Juha Partanen; Pekka Jalovaara
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2003-10-29       Impact factor: 3.075

View more
  22 in total

1.  Failure of knee arthroplasty secondary to inadequate technique in cephalomedullary nailing of a subtrochanteric hip fracture.

Authors:  Rhys Gareth Ellis Clement; Richard Burnett
Journal:  BMJ Case Rep       Date:  2012-04-02

2.  A new technique for lag screw placement in the dynamic hip screw fixation of intertrochanteric fractures: decreasing radiation time dramatically.

Authors:  Wei-Chao Sheng; Jia-Zhen Li; Sheng-Hua Chen; Shi-Zhen Zhong
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2008-02-12       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 3.  [Pertrochanteric femoral fractures in the elderly].

Authors:  G H Sandmann; P Biberthaler
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 1.000

4.  Intramedullary versus extramedullary fixation in the treatment of subtrochanteric femur fractures: A comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jie Wang; Haomin Li; Haobo Jia; Xinlong Ma
Journal:  Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 1.511

5.  Use of blocking screws in intramedullary fixation of subtrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Nirav H Amin; Anna Katsman; Rajit Chakravarty; Susan Harding; Douglas L Cerynik
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2011-11-01

6.  Comparison between locked and unlocked intramedullary nails in intertrochanteric fractures.

Authors:  Riccardo Maria Lanzetti; Auro Caraffa; Domenico Lupariello; Paolo Ceccarini; Giulio Gambaracci; Luigi Meccariello; Francesco Manfreda; Daniele Maiettini; Cristina Ibáñez Vicente; Michele Scialpi; Olga Bisaccia; Giuseppe Rinonapoli; Michele Bisaccia
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2018-02-09

Review 7.  [Trochanteric femoral fractures: anatomy, biomechanics and choice of implants].

Authors:  F Bonnaire; T Lein; P Bula
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2011-06       Impact factor: 1.000

8.  Nailing or plating for subtrochanteric femoral fractures: a non-randomized comparative study.

Authors:  Ahmet Imerci; Umut Canbek; Vasfi Karatosun; Levent Karapınar; Murat Yeşil
Journal:  Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol       Date:  2015-04-14

9.  [Clinical effectiveness of less invasive intramedullary nail fixation combined with titanium cable cerclage for subtrochanteric fractures].

Authors:  Z D Liu; T M Xu; Y Dang; D Y Zhang; Z G Fu
Journal:  Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban       Date:  2020-12-18

10.  Advances in the surgical treatment of fragility fractures of the upper femur.

Authors:  Francesco Muncibì; Veronica Petrai; Lorenzo Nistri; Roberto Civinini; Massimo Innocenti
Journal:  Clin Cases Miner Bone Metab       Date:  2009-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.